I am having real issues with this now. I wear contacts and they just can't seem to find a way to correct for both presbyopia and my nearsightedness. I end up wearing multifocals and still have to use reading glasses when wearing the contacts. I don't bother with bifocal glasses since when I am wearing glasses and want to read I just remove the glasses and I can read just fine.
I thought I'd try contacts about six months back. I adjusted to them very quickly, loved the vision quality especially the peripheral vision. The problem I had was I couldn't read and couldn't use the computer. Tried the monovision thing and other iterations that aren't fresh in my brain right now but the bottom line was I was going to need glasses. The contacts corrected my nearsightedness but I was still going to have to haul around bifocals with the top having correction for the computer and the bottom for reading. Didn't make much sense to me and I wasted my coverage for a year.Yeah, I think that's about the long and the short of it. When I look dead-on, things are crystal clear. Peripherals, not so much. It's a weird kind of buggy, fish-eye quality on the edges, enough to be pretty bothersome, with everything skewed and blurred in my periphery. Is it poor fitting glasses or a bad prescription? Who knows. I may just need to bite the bullet, go back to the good optometrist, and start fresh. This will have been about a $100 mistake, all told, but what can you do?
Presbyopia.
The coatings on lenses do wear down. So you have to get new lenses every few years.I started using an optometrist chain several years ago when I first moved to Alaska since my insurance had a yearly benefit for exam/glasses (free/$200). Going with the chain, I had to replace the glasses each year, and I'd have to pay an extra maybe $100 to get the lenses I wanted. The frames were pretty cheap and flimsy.
A couple years ago, I decided to try the optometrist that set up office at my primary doctor's clinic. Let's just say, I ended up paying an additional $600 for a new pair of glasses; however, the frames were of significantly higher quality, and the lenses have a life-time warranty. As long as I don't sit on them or my eyes don't get worse, I think I can get several more years out of them.
I have been getting glasses from Zenni. The first ones I got were el cheapo and very disappointing. However, I started buying a little better quality and I'm quite pleased. Plastic frames, the ones I get now are these:I'm a 24/7 glasses-wearer, and since it's been a few years since my last prescription change, I knew it was time for an update. Thing is, my employer dropped the VSP from my insurance plan last year. So, deciding to try to save a few bucks, I went to the "optical center" at my local Target. I was the first appointment of the day, but the doctor was extremely late getting into the office. Maybe for that reason, my appointment felt extremely rushed-probably less than 10 minutes total. Nevertheless, I got my prescription, went online to Zenni Optical, and ordered a new pair of glasses. They came a couple days ago, and I'm extremely disappointed. The prescription doesn't seem quite right, the frames don't fit very well at all, they look nothing like the picture, and it's really cheap, crappy quality. I know, I know: what did I expect? You get what you pay for.
So I thought about chalking it up to a learning experience, eating the cost of my Zenni glasses (not much), and returning to the optometrist who I used to see when I had insurance. He always did really great, thorough work, and I've always been happy. But I called his office to see how much an appointment costs without insurance: $125. Ouch. And I'm sure that the cost of new glasses from his office would also be quite high.
So, I'm feeling pretty dumb at the moment. Maybe eyewear wasn't something smart for me to skimp on. Am I the only one who's been burned by the big box store optometrists?
I'm a 24/7 glasses-wearer,
Costco eye exam, $55.
It must suck to have to wear glasses to sleep. Does that help you see your dreams better?
I wish...Costco eye exams here are $80.
hate the whole optometrist scam bit. Doesn't take a doctor in today's modern world to figure out a persons eye sight level at all. Just worthless middle step man in the way that are only there now due to union protectionism that makes consumers pay more for a service that they shouldn't have to.
For that, I go to an ophthamologist. A particularly talented optometrist might be more knowledgeable/experienced as far as significant medical issues are concerned, on a more or less "intuitive" basis, but without pupil dilation, you simply cannot see anything in great detail or very far back into the eyeball, and I don't think I"ve ever even heard of an optometrist doing that. I've certainly never had one give me that sort of exam.They do check other things you know, like they can see in your eye to see if anything serious is developing or what not.
For that, I go to an ophthamologist. A particularly talented optometrist might be more knowledgeable/experienced as far as significant medical issues are concerned, on a more or less "intuitive" basis, but without pupil dilation, you simply cannot see anything in great detail or very far back into the eyeball, and I don't think I"ve ever even heard of an optometrist doing that. I've certainly never had one give me that sort of exam.
Interesting. Never had an optometrist even mention possibly dilating my pupils to do a retinal exam. (For that matter, if I'd been asked, I couldn't have said with certainty that their state licenses allow for that...) Intraocular pressure, yes, always, but that's pretty much it (apart from vision correction.)Optometrists up here check your retina and pressure. If they find something they don't like, you get referral to ophthalmologist.
Yeah, most optometrists do the dilation, in my experience...Interesting. Never had an optometrist even mention possibly dilating my pupils to do a retinal exam. (For that matter, if I'd been asked, I couldn't have said with certainty that their state licenses allow for that...) Intraocular pressure, yes, always, but that's pretty much it (apart from vision correction.)