that's a bad chop and, well...dumb.
that's a bad chop and, well...dumb.
I don't have to begin, take a look at what you wrote. You must be 10 if you think "homeland security" would be any better if we didn't go after Osama. Grow up and learn what a budget is, and how they are allocated. Middle school conspiracy theorists are so cute.
i doubt you could do better
anyways i was just celebrating, give a man a royal break
How about all the people died or lost their homes in the South caused by tornadoes? Donald Trump is still a billionaire and laughing all the way to the bank with all the free publicity.
You do know that Trump is not a billionaire, right?
You do know that Trump is not a billionaire, right?
on some days he is...
depending on his mood
In my opinion everybody is thanking the wrong person. The person who should be thanked is the Navy SEAL operator who had Obama in his sights, squeezed the trigger, and got a kill shot. That's the guy who deserves all the bragging rights, not Obama. Obama just gave approval to the mission. Because of the secretive nature of special ops, we may never find out who the actual Navy Seal was who killed him. But that guy is the true hero here.
freudian slip much?
that NAVY seal would not have had the opportunity if it were not for Obama, who did more than just approve the mission.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalp...but-wanting-evidence-of-obls-death-cance.html
Clinton had him on a silver platter and didn't have the guts to give the go.
Bush bombed the hell out of any place that OBL could possibly be, then the 50 mile radius around it.
I know what I wrote. But I also see what you DIDN'T write. You didn't give me any facts, any thoughts, nothing at all to back up what you say. You keep insulting me, but you cant say anything smart to back up your claims.
As for the budget, I see how they allocated it. They allocated it so well, we barely avoided a second great depression. ; )
As for the conspiracy, obviously I have no proof, but I don't see any proof that it was Osama or Al Quaida who planned and committed those terrorist acts in the US. The terrorists may be smart and resourceful, but they are not smart and resourceful enough to carry out an attack on such a large scale, somehow managing not being shot down en route to their targets and avoiding all security. Hence these suspicions that there was help from inside are justified.
And the fact that all this was used to invade Iraq, a country that posed no real threat as was discovered later... (no wmd's found) That is what's retarded. Much more harm than good was done. Museums with priceless relics were looted.... Valued pieces of history destroyed... Hundreds of US soldiers killed... Beautiful city in ruins... Social order and structure destabilized, a country without a real ruler. Many govt officials filled their pockets with the money that was supposed to go for the war in Iraq and toward rebuilding it after the war.
Saddam may have been a tyrant, but he was THEIR tyrant. Al least under his rule, looters weren't roaming the streets, and bombs weren't going off in broad daylight. The majority of those people didn't want democracy. Why force it on them? The war started with Iraquis cheering for the American soldiers and praying for their success, now, many of them just want the Americans to leave.
wtf
all the nutters are coming out to play
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4540958/ns/nightly_news/
(I linked to MSNBC for a major news source. Do your own Googling and you will see there are more detailed sites that aren't as credible)
Clinton had the chance to kill Bin Laden. Our soldiers knew exactly where he was but Clinton was afraid of collateral damage.
In 96, Sudan offered us Bin Laden. Clinton declined because he didn't want to deal with him.
on some days he is...
depending on his mood
Anything in history could have been a lie. People like you lead pretty shitty lives.
rudeguy, Posts: 27,642
Keep that number grow to prove youy're not a nut...