OT: End of Hubble :(

Tarca

Platinum Member
Sep 6, 2001
2,200
0
0
It was to be retired around 2010 anyway...


link

So it's life falls short a few years. Plus there is a better telescope in the works.:camera:
 

Smoke

Distributed Computing Elite Member
Jan 3, 2001
12,649
198
106
Clipped from the article, "NASA was already planning to replace the Hubble with a new, improved version, called the James Webb Space Telescope, scheduled for launch in 2011."
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,133
220
106
Originally posted by: GeoffS
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/01/16/hubble.telescope.ap/index.html

I guess if we're going to the moon again and Mars, the money's gotta come from somewhere...


What $$??? What is bush ganna pull it out of his ass? This guy is dreaming... It's all a buch of BS.

It is a nice idea tho. We already spent our wad on the so called "war"... It still isn't over with yet. We are so far in debt now ... I heard they don't even have the plans to make another saturn 5 rocket. Oh did you think we can just make another one? Doubt it. I don't think we have 10 trillion sitting around to send another human to the moon. Maybe if we didn't take a vacation in Iraq. Sigh...

Altho, if you really think he is going to do what he says Vote for him again. Since that is what he want's you to "think"... Even if we did pull everyone out of Iraq now there still wouldn't be any funds left to do this. So, we might as well enjoy our little tour over there since it's gonna be awhile.



 

mastertech01

Moderator Emeritus Elite Member
Nov 13, 1999
11,875
282
126
I think we should send the shuttle up and retrofit Hubble with rockets and send it on a one way voyage into deep space, taking all the high res photos we can as far as it will reach.
 

titanmiller

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2003
2,123
2
81
I heard they >>>????don't????<<<< even have the plans to make another saturn 5 rocket.

I'll be there if it happens, no doubt


One thing that you must remember is that much of this new moon programs funding will be comming form the military, not so sure about mars.
 

mastertech01

Moderator Emeritus Elite Member
Nov 13, 1999
11,875
282
126
Originally posted by: networkman
/radio whiskey tango foxtrot

You must have been a Marine. We straight legs say Romeo Whiskey Tango Foxtrox.........Over..

 

networkman

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
10,436
1
0
Nah.. just something I saw in another thread.

But I do agree with your idea -- let's send up some kind of robotic space craft to lock onto Hubble and push it off into deep space - maybe include some kind of radio-trasmitter on the probe to send signals back to Earth(think along the lines of Pioneer and Voyager); this way it has a 3-fold purpose: a) we continue to get data and pictures of stuff "out there", b) according to my HS physics, "bodies in motion tend to stay in motion", so as long as it's not snagged by another planet's gravity, it'll continue to float thru space(which is alot safer than trying to control re-entry into our atmosphere), and c) if we send it off into deep-space, we can always hope some other civilization finds it and considers returning it -- in person. :Q

If nothing else, perhaps(after we're long gone, or hopefully long before then) it'll get captured by the gravity of some other planet's intelligent species and at least then THEY would have proof that they aren't (or haven't been) alone in the universe!
 

Assimilator1

Elite Member
Nov 4, 1999
24,120
507
126
Originally posted by: mastertech01
I think we should send the shuttle up and retrofit Hubble with rockets and send it on a one way voyage into deep space, taking all the high res photos we can as far as it will reach.
Nice idea

It is a shame that hubble will die early
And yeah I was wondering where the extra $$$$'s would come from for these new missions...........
 

RaySun2Be

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
16,565
6
71
Originally posted by: networkman
Nah.. just something I saw in another thread.

But I do agree with your idea -- let's send up some kind of robotic space craft to lock onto Hubble and push it off into deep space - maybe include some kind of radio-trasmitter on the probe to send signals back to Earth(think along the lines of Pioneer and Voyager); this way it has a 3-fold purpose: a) we continue to get data and pictures of stuff "out there", b) according to my HS physics, "bodies in motion tend to stay in motion", so as long as it's not snagged by another planet's gravity, it'll continue to float thru space(which is alot safer than trying to control re-entry into our atmosphere), and c) if we send it off into deep-space, we can always hope some other civilization finds it and considers returning it -- in person. :Q

If nothing else, perhaps(after we're long gone, or hopefully long before then) it'll get captured by the gravity of some other planet's intelligent species and at least then THEY would have proof that they aren't (or haven't been) alone in the universe!

Agreed.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: networkman
Nah.. just something I saw in another thread.

But I do agree with your idea -- let's send up some kind of robotic space craft to lock onto Hubble and push it off into deep space - maybe include some kind of radio-trasmitter on the probe to send signals back to Earth(think along the lines of Pioneer and Voyager); this way it has a 3-fold purpose: a) we continue to get data and pictures of stuff "out there", b) according to my HS physics, "bodies in motion tend to stay in motion", so as long as it's not snagged by another planet's gravity, it'll continue to float thru space(which is alot safer than trying to control re-entry into our atmosphere), and c) if we send it off into deep-space, we can always hope some other civilization finds it and considers returning it -- in person. :Q

If nothing else, perhaps(after we're long gone, or hopefully long before then) it'll get captured by the gravity of some other planet's intelligent species and at least then THEY would have proof that they aren't (or haven't been) alone in the universe!

Also agree!

And did I see a typo in that AP article...???

"Astronomers have found that galaxies and clusters of galaxies formed much earlier that theorists had expected."
 

HayHauler

Golden Member
Feb 21, 2003
1,217
0
0
hahaha, just goes to show you that writers need better spell checkers....


Hay

Cheers :beer:
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |