Several websites, including
the Guardian, have tried to demonstrate the Saudi's act as hypocritical by pointing out that moments of silence were in fact held for the death of former Saudi King Abdullah. However, those examples are misleading. Two were held in other countries—Qatar and the UAE, to be precise—which have different prevailing interpretations of Islam that allow for such silences. Also, none of those instances actually involved Saudis.
I asked
Wael Jabir, Dubai based editor of Middle East football website
Ahdaaf.me, whether Saudi Arabia's refusal to observe the moment of silence has anything to do with being sympathetic to or condoning the London attacks, as some people have suggested. "In short, no. I don't believe this is the reason at all," he replied via Twitter direct messages. "A minute's silence is seen in the more conservative interpretation of Islam prevalent in Saudi as a '
Bida'h', something that the prophet Muhammad never did so they should not be doing...In practice, what that means is that Saudis never observe minutes of silence for any incidents, even the death of their own king or fellow citizens."