You're wasting your time trying to find out the unknown when there is so much that is knowable that you have yet to discover.
You're wasting your time trying to find out the unknown when there is so much that is knowable that you have yet to discover.
You get the weirdest results if you do a google image search of Great Green Arklseizure. One of the images that comes up is one I used in a spoof image twelve years ago. Small world.I believe in the Great Green Arklseizure creation story.
But the "knowable" is unknown until it's known...if people followed your advice, we'd still be living in caves, eating raw meat.
My point was that what he's trying to do is akin to a contractor trying to build the top floor before building the foundation. Like trying to read the last page of a book before reading the rest. Like a first grader trying to learn calculus before the prerequisite math first.
There is a lot to learn before the advanced concepts to get the best understanding of them. This is one of the reasons I dislike popular science books written for laypersons as they are forced to leave a lot of what I feel are important details out.
If they inspire someone to learn more of a subject its great, but not as a substitute for a more thorough understanding which can give people a false sense of understanding, or worse, total confusion or incorrect assumptions from a lack of essential background information.
The universe was not created from nothing. It started from a point infinitely dense which exploded for an unknown reason.
It you want to blow your mind, consider that 49% of the matter created in the big bang was antimatter, and 51% was matter. Most of it annihilated each other, and everything you see today is made from that leftover 1%.
all i need to know about what was before the universe was created is in the in scriptures.
It was created from nothing.
All the energy that is in the known universe was created from the big bang.
Which was nothing before the big bang. Where did the energy come from. There was nothing.
Explain that scientists.
But...when talking about the "origins of the universe," it's still all just fancy guess work...no one really knows what happened, when or where it happened, or if there even was a when or where when it happened.
Why is it assumed that nothing existed before our universe came into being? That pov seems more than a bit short-sighted. That's one major problem I have with the viewpoint of most religions - that we are the special, chosen ones created to exist on a relatively obscure planet in a galaxy with a billion stars, in a universe with a billion galaxies. Doesn't that seem a bit egocentric? Who is to say there is only one universe too? There may be billions of them as well.
The universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us, seems like an awful waste of space. ― Carl Sagan