- Jul 26, 2011
- 8,548
- 2
- 0
http://videocardz.com/47039/xfx-radeon-r9-290x-overclocking-temperatures-exposedRadeon R9 290X temperature
First up, the leaker confirms that R9 290X is running at 94 °C under Furmark, but he says that it’s relatively quiet. In fact the mentions that AMD scarified the temperature for quieter operation. Which would make sense I guess, although it would be much easier if AMD could just made a better cooler? Actually I think he just forgot to disable Silent Mode. Or maybe his drivers don’t even support it at all.
Yes, I do know Furmark is not the appropriate way of temperature/load testing of the GPU, but since I’m not the one who made this test then I suggest you stop complaining about it.
Plus, you also have more charts right below with 3DMark and Metro temperatures, which are probably more reliable for further comparisons. To make it easier for you here’s a list of what you can find on the pictures:
Furmark — 94 °C
3DMark — 52 °C
3DMark + OC — 55 °C
Metro 2033 — 70 °C
The takehome message here is that overclocked gaming temps was 70C max in Metro 2033, and 55C max in 3dmark. Looks like the temperature "issue" was a non issue.
Furthermore, overclocking : this was a reference card and according to linus, aftermarket cards will also be available near launch. He is doing a review of an aftermarket 290X, in fact, as was mentioned on his podcast.
STOCK 3DMARK REFERENCE CARD :
OVERCLOCKED 3DMARK REFERENCE CARD : 1130MHZ:
Overall, OC scaling looks very good. More info:
1) Leakers all used stock voltage, no over-volting and were using reference PCB cards
2) reference 290X is not voltage locked, allows up to 1.35V once afterburner and other software are updated
3) aftermarket cards will be available shortly after launch
Last edited: