Person1:
So it's dumb buying an $100-125 CPU and overclocking it to match the performance of $250-300? Right!
Person1:
<Here someone posts a reasonable explanation, and gets ignored.>
Person 2
<Further reasoning that gets ignored...>
Person 2
_________________________________________
It's hard to argue with people that claim "superior experience", so I was wondering if any of the regulars at Anandtech would find it amusing enough to respond.
Pardon the waste of bandwidth.
After working in electronics for 15 years and a bachelors degree in the field OC is the dumbest thing you can do end of story. You fail at life and science
So it's dumb buying an $100-125 CPU and overclocking it to match the performance of $250-300? Right!
Person1:
Re read what you quoted and to many years working in Electronics and knowing how shit works. You can overclock but there is really no reason to do so maybe you had great luck with a processor but in general ive seen to many boards blown and kids say I never overclock! A few simple tests show you are blowing your shit up, to many hours bench testing electronics and know better. Spend the extra 200 bucks as a simple 5% isnt enough to warrant an overclock.
Overclocking doesnt match the performance in many areas your risk is higher in burning up components, not to mention voiding the warranty of the components and having to pay another 125 for the same shitty cpu you just destroyed.
I have a Bachelors degree in EEE ive worked in the field for over 10 years exp if you must know.
<Here someone posts a reasonable explanation, and gets ignored.>
Person 2
Yes, a CPU may have a safe voltage limit, but the way it is looked at is that it runs at a cruising voltage. It gets so many years and cruises safely at the correct voltage without diminishing. Overclocking leads to shortening of lifespan and diminishing power over time indefinitely unless it is a minor overclock (in which case there is a factory overclocked available usually). Once you buy the 80 dollar cooling unit, which already voids the warranty and makes it cost the same as the upgraded processor, you may as well had bought the upgrade.
I was also just trying to list my comp configuration before to say it runs solid, good value, and very happy with it. I have the factory overclocked processor. Stock it comes 2.4 , but for a few dollars more I upgraded to the 2.53 .
<Further reasoning that gets ignored...>
Person 2
This is very true although Ive seen people burn out processors instantly from overclocking. If its more than 10% you're wasting your time (It will most likely burn out within the year or at least start to lose power which means back to square one).
Is 10% really worth loss of lifetime warranty and installing and aftermarket fan also instantly voids warranty. How can they tell if its been tampered with? No idea. Seems like it would be smart to overclock if you had the means to buy a new processor within the next year or two. Very logical case. Overclocking a brand new processor on a machine where you just spent your budget limit, wouldn't even think about it unless i had a backup.
Also, the case of power supplies, they say you can run 600 watts, read the instructions or manual though, it will run about 400 watts consistently at "cruise" voltage. Same with processor. They just set it to the correct cruise voltage. IE..if your processor is not fast enough out of the box, should have saved for a better one or be ready to throw it out if its not a minor overclock.
_________________________________________
It's hard to argue with people that claim "superior experience", so I was wondering if any of the regulars at Anandtech would find it amusing enough to respond.
Pardon the waste of bandwidth.