Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: myocardia
Originally posted by: evolucion8
My 3.4 Northwood reached 3.73GHz max, after that It became unstable, probably the memory is the limiting factor here, they're OCZ Gold PC3200 Ultra Low Latency, 2-2-2-5, probably better overclocking can be get using higher speed RAMs like PC3500 or PC4000 which I will try to get after april.
Your RAM has BH-5 IC's, which will do 250 Mhz @ 2-2-2-5 to 2-2-2-7 timings, with 3.2v of vdimm and a fan blowing on them. It will also do ~240 Mhz @ 2.5-3-3-7 with 2.8v of vdimm.
wow ... is that "safe"?
:Q
and he can also use the 5:4 divider ... which doesn't lose 'that much' performance ... but it will allow you to find your max core o/c.
anyway ... i was asked about my 3DMark05 scores for my 3.4EE at 3.71Ghz/x1950p-512M/1GB PC3500
9280 @ 3.7Ghz
1) 40.2
2) 25.9
3) 49.1
4380 CPU *compare*
4748 - ev8's 3.4c@ 3.73 and
Key's 3.8ES 4298
1) 2.1
2) 4.0
3DMarkXX is particularly useful tracking the
changes in a system and secpndly, comparing very similar systems
how was the party,
evolucion8?
i used to do that ...
... race home from working all week, run 3DMark05 and THEN race off to party
[well, i did that when i was younger ... up to a couple of years ago]
back to topic ... your 3.4c@3.73 scores higher than my 3.4EE@3.71 in the CPU score [4380 vs. 4748 and vs Keysplayer's 4298], but you are clearly held back in your overall system's performance by your x800xt ... with a x1950p you should score higher [i guess, well over 9k]
and
keysplayr2003, a "suggestion" ... perhaps if you O/C your CPU, you might get a higher score with your eVGA 7900GT ... if it is
held back in any way. At any rate, you would definitely benefit from a faster GPU [imo]
edited over-and-over
done