Parler is back online so...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
27,673
26,796
136
That depends on the day of the week and the current moonphase. I'm pretty sure the fucker is bipolar.

Jaskalas has been slowly changing and he does understand that many GOP policies are wrong. On economic policies he is pretty liberal. When it comes to social issues he tends to be much more conservative.
 

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
9,478
13,027
146
You lying piece of shit.
I NEVER SAID it was unfair.
I am merely telling you that they oppose being silenced. It is a partisan issue. AKA Water is wet.
Stop being a doucebag, grow the fuck up, and face the truth without attacking people trying to explain it.
You are only "explaining" your fucked up opinion that the idiots getting Parler pulled from AWS is ALL THE DEM'S FAULT. That's not explanation, it's FUD.

Applicable (for you, @Jaskalas)

Jaskalas has been slowly changing and he does understand that many GOP policies are wrong. On economic policies he is pretty liberal. When it comes to social issues he tends to be much more conservative.
He sure likes blaming Democrats for the Republicans being shitty people, though.
 
Last edited:

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,019
8,056
136
He sure likes blaming Democrats for the Republicans being shitty people, though.

Should I use small words, so that you can keep up?
Go on then, where did I blame Democrats?
Surely if you are not lying you can demonstrate this.

Simply stating that people are taking action, does not include a value proposition to that action. It merely states that they have acted. It is incredulous that you would deny it.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,027
8,560
136
Who's hosting it ... The FBI?

I’m sure the FBI and other watchdogs are thrilled to have it back.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
38,209
18,679
146
Many posts / posters in this topic are reactionary when coming into contact with the startling notion that Republicans oppose the content moderation coming from "Big Tech", which happens to be targeting Republicans. :bigthink: It's almost like the partisan nature of THIS ENTIRE NATION is resulting in partisan content moderation.

Heaven forbid I call water... wet?
Let's start at the top....



You are simply wrong. Those are Democrat policies. As Republicans are fleeing in droves to less filtered services. For freedom, or madness. Depending on how you classify their alt-reality. For example: https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/17/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-twitter/index.html

When Democrats silence Republicans, Republicans will endeavor to not be silenced. Parler and Republican based media offer them that. You have struck at something more central and more important to them than Fox News.

The ToS always was there. So I would say CNN is incorrect in saying it's "new" policy. Since you apparently haven't read the ToS, here it is:



Honest question, have you looked outside? Have you... seen America lately?

Republicans are forming a new religion. Core tenets of it include an alt-reality with its own set of facts and truthiness. When you try to content filter the truth, you are content filtering Republicans. This is inherently a Republican VS Democrat topic. Stop trying to pretend it isn't. Parler exists because Democrats are filtering Republicans and Republicans are getting tired of it. Then Parler is boycotted because Republicans do something stupid / dangerous to our Republic. That escalation with a pursuit and chase down to silence their alt-media is ongoing.

You're literally telling me it's a R vs. D issue because facts have a liberal bias. And? We know this. Do I personally care about other's alt-facts, no....can't say that I do. The problem, as I've said many times, is that TW and FB waited WAY too long to enforce their ToS. So when they finally do, it looks bad now. But, as you said....facts have a liberal bias....so it makes sense that TW and FB would be targeting less liberals...because misinformation campaigns arent their strong suit.

I expect, for the notion of everyone's safety (and judicial claims of illegal content) that Parler will continue to be pursued as far as Democrats can pursue it.

I'm sorry, are you going to claim that Republicans are on board with that? Trying to shut down their own media? To silence their own voters? To stop their own religion? That this isn't partisan? Hahahaha... you want me to believe that crap? Why? Why would you guys cling to that delusion except for your own Ego? I like to think that a Liberal would pursue the truth no matter how painful it may seem to you. Granted, we are still only human. Apparently a wake up call is needed. A recent news article may allow me to demonstrate a truth of mine that, I am guessing you wouldn't believe if I told you. Especially given the fact that I've already posted of it a few times before.

Republicans won't be onboard with anything that isn't Republican. However, they are free to establish their own tech platforms to run whatever they want within the confines of our laws. If they violate the historically very forgiving rules in place, then they're subject to whatever that rule maker says. Like not hosting their website anymore. I know, I know, *gasp*. pretty crazy right? I mean, it's not like Conservatives have ever engaged in that type of behavior. We don't have centuries upon centuries of history to prove otherwise or anything.

What kind of wake up call are you looking for here? Was ramping up the domestic terror rhetoric for years and years gonna end any other way?

See... the Republicans I know want Trump to perform a military coup. Because Democrats stole the election. It just so happens, MyPillow Guy, Mike Lindell was at the White House holding a piece of paper. Detailing portions of that coup as described to me by my local Republicans days earlier. This isn't a few people. This is the Republican Party. Not every last one of them, but people like Romney have no place among the faithful and will be driven out. Those that remain want our blood. And that is no exaggeration.

I don't get what your play is here. Are you saying that FB, TW, AWS should host them or else?
 
Last edited:

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,253
10,841
136
Did someone hijack Jaskalas' recently? Is this not the same person posting under this account for years? If I recall correctly, he is left leaning and uses his brain to think about issues. If this is the same person, then I trust he is asking honest questions and it is just a bunch of jackbooted thugs trying to silence him....sounds familiar.

If some really did hijack his account and is now posting support for alt-right content, then I can see where most of you are coming from.
He is a recovering right winger from Alabama (iirc). Although from a policy stand point he has moderated or liberalized a lot of the years, he still has some of the right victimhood issues and being from Bama the next civil war is always a few weeks away.
 
Last edited:

Hail The Brain Slug

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2005
3,502
2,452
136
Go on then, where did I blame Democrats?
Surely if you are not lying you can demonstrate this.

Surely if you are not an ignoramus you can comprehend that blanket saying that private corporate entities that have been strictly enforcing terms of service prohibiting illegal content and requiring moderation of such is "Democrats continue to pursue a "you will filter content to our liking" " is blaming "the democrats" for the actions of private entities.
 

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
9,478
13,027
146
Ultimately if Democrats continue to pursue a "you will filter content to our liking"...
...It has no other choice if boycotts are continued.
Do you think Democrats will not apply pressure on those services to remove Republicans from their system?
...partisan content moderation...
...Those are Democrat policies...
...When Democrats silence Republicans...

When you try to content filter the truth, you are content filtering Republicans. This is inherently a Republican VS Democrat topic. Stop trying to pretend it isn't. Parler exists because Democrats are filtering Republicans and Republicans are getting tired of it.
I expect, for the notion of everyone's safety (and judicial claims of illegal content) that Parler will continue to be pursued as far as Democrats can pursue it.
It is a partisan issue.
Should I use small words, so that you can keep up?
Go on then, where did I blame Democrats?
Surely if you are not lying you can demonstrate this.
NOPE NOPE I NEVER SAID THOSE WORDS HURRRRR...

Shut the fuck up, clown.
 
Reactions: darkswordsman17

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
9,478
13,027
146
The funny part is Parler kicked / banned plenty of people.
You'd last half a second on there if you said anything in support of any democrat (or non-Repub) or didn't just generally agree with the ideas and tone from other members. They don't like 'stand-outs', they want RWNJ parrots.

Edit: this is exactly why I laughed at the notion that they had no moderation- it was moderated alright, but the opposite direction of what you'd expect. They had fairly rabid mods/admins from what I heard.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: DarthKyrie

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
38,209
18,679
146
You'd last half a second on there if you said anything in support of any democrat (or non-Repub) or didn't just generally agree with the ideas and tone from other members. They don't like 'stand-outs', they want RWNJ parrots.

Guess what, they want ad revenue just like TW and FB. Parler is an opportunistic money grab preying on peoples feels, largely supportive of the alt-reality that conservatives have crafted for themselves. But, it boils down to money. Bottom line, just like TW and FB: If it's free, you're the product they're selling.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
23,111
21,235
136
You'd last half a second on there if you said anything in support of any democrat (or non-Repub) or didn't just generally agree with the ideas and tone from other members. They don't like 'stand-outs', they want RWNJ parrots.

Edit: this is exactly why I laughed at the notion that they had no moderation- it was moderated alright, but the opposite direction of what you'd expect. They had fairly rabid mods/admins from what I heard.

I follow this liberal guy on Twitter who likes to cuss a lot, Tony Posnanski, He called Dan Bongino a "Toaster Head motherfucker" on Parler in the early days of Parler and got banned immediately lol
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,019
8,056
136
I follow this liberal guy on Twitter who likes to cuss a lot, Tony Posnanski, He called Dan Bongino a "Toaster Head motherfucker" on Parler in the early days of Parler and got banned immediately lol

I don't think Republicans would mind something that is biased towards them. Just as we do not mind something biased towards us. Par the course really.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,019
8,056
136
NOPE NOPE I NEVER SAID THOSE WORDS HURRRRR...

Shut the fuck up, clown.

"Democrats and Republicans are fighting"
Is somehow equal to "Democrats are evil" in your twisted mind?
Sorry, I get it now. English must be a second language for you and I apologize for not seeing that sooner and being more accommodating.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

Hail The Brain Slug

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2005
3,502
2,452
136
"Democrats and Republicans are fighting"
Is somehow equal to "Democrats are evil" in your twisted mind?
Sorry, I get it now. English must be a second language for you and I apologize for not seeing that sooner and being more accommodating.

Literally no post in this thread said "Democrats are evil", either by you or by anyone claiming you said it.

Shut the fuck up.
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,695
4,204
136
I believe many Trumpers do want that for sure. The reason Trump and other righties got suspended from Twitter is because they were either neo-nazis promoting violence, QAnon promoting violence, or pushing massive conspiracies like the election was going to be stolen SINCE LAST SPRING with really no other intention but to inspire violence if Trump lost. Maybe don't be neo-nazis or Q-Anon? What should Twitter do at this point? Let these people spew white nationalist hate speech and conspiracy theories that inspire violence? The FBI labeled QAnon a violence inspiring domestic threat a while ago. Twitter should let them have a platform?

Exactly. Its not FB or Twitters fault that all neo-nazis, Q-Tards are Republicans. They are not targeting republicans. They are targeting hateful/violent things that republicans just happen to like. Its really the republican's fault.

Sorry, I meant Antifa did it.
 

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
9,478
13,027
146
"Democrats and Republicans are fighting"
Is somehow equal to "Democrats are evil" in your twisted mind?
Sorry, I get it now. English must be a second language for you and I apologize for not seeing that sooner and being more accommodating.
Such a dishonest shithead. Shut the fuck up, clown.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,019
8,056
136
I don't get what your play is here. Are you saying that FB, TW, AWS should host them or else?

My original post was stating Parler's options. With the thought that their host is not "safe" unless it was one of three options. The fact that their website is public means they did not take option #1. So I expect their new host can be taken down quite easily. Unless it actually is Russia. Which I think is the most likely destination for Republican media. But option #3 is always there, if they get tired of running away.

As for my reply and quote... more than one poster is somehow outraged and indignant over the idea that there is partisan fighting in America. As if the idea of content moderating / filtering is non-partisan. I am stating that they are wrong to call it non-partisan, and I am demonstrating my point by highlighting the American Divide with people who live in an alt-reality, are part of a religious cult, and who happen to want our blood because we stole an election from them.

What kind of wake up call are you looking for here?

I want... for posters here to wake up and do not pretend that the battle over Parler and content moderation isn't Republican VS Democrat? You called my original post "pushing a conspiracy theory". WTF is that? The backlash my first post received, from multiple posters, was shocking and radically off base from any purpose I had in originally posting in this topic. The reply is simply an address of those responses. I thank you for at least engaging even if there remains a huge gap in mutual understanding. Some of the other posts however....
 
Reactions: Pohemi

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
9,478
13,027
146
As for my reply and quote... more than one poster is somehow outraged and indignant over the idea that there is partisan fighting in America. As if the idea of content moderating / filtering is non-partisan. I am stating that they are wrong to call it non-partisan, and I am demonstrating my point by highlighting the American Divide with people who live in an alt-reality, are part of a religious cult, and who happen to want our blood because we stole an election from them.

I want... for posters here to wake up and do not pretend that the battle over Parler and content moderation isn't Republican VS Democrat? You called my original post "pushing a conspiracy theory". WTF is that? The backlash my first post received, from multiple posters, was shocking and radically off base from any purpose I had in originally posting in this topic. The reply is simply an address of those responses. I thank you for at least engaging even if there remains a huge gap in mutual understanding. Some of the other posts however....
No. What you want (and continue to do) is make claims that 'republicans' being filtered online was pointed actions taken by Democrats. You refuse to acknowledge that there are ToS on private corporation's services and that it has nothing to do with Democrats or what they want.

Then you deny ever proposing the notion. Who is twisting words here, you dishonest shit?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |