Pascal 1080 Benchmarks

[railven]

Every video card launch we have people shifting their opinions on which review sites are paid off...

Maybe you guys should just stop reading reviews.

That will never happen. At this point everyone is bribed by NV. EVERYONE! Me too! You too!

Even the guys complaining! All bribed by NV.

 

[Silverforce11]

@Face2Face
Because most of the standard MOSFETs used on graphics cards are each good for ~25W before they become leaky/overheat.

The 5 phase is for the core, the 1 is for the vram. 200W for the core is going to limit it's OC. If you like to OC, get the custom board with 8-12 phases.

 

[Udgnim]

Any benches of gtx1080 in DX12 Hitman available ?

possible reasons for no Hitman DX 12 benchmarks is due to reviewers having issues getting it to work or Nvidia saying to use DX11 in its review guide

more interested if any site is going to do Quantum Break since that killed Maxwell

 

[Silverforce11]

possible reasons for no DX 12 benchmarks is due to reviewers having issues getting it to work or Nvidia saying to use DX11 in its review guide

more interested if any site is going to do Quantum Break since that killed Maxwell

Yep, honestly if QB doesn't see a massive improvement, what NV claims about Pascal may again be another Maxwell repeat lies.

There's no way a GPU with functional preemption and fast context switching (NV also claimed Maxwell could do it lol) suffers that badly in a compute heavy game like QB.

 

[AtenRa]

possible reasons for no Hitman DX 12 benchmarks is due to reviewers having issues getting it to work or Nvidia saying to use DX11 in its review guide

more interested if any site is going to do Quantum Break since that killed Maxwell

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru.../72619-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-review-21.html

 

[Head1985]

Digital foundry
1080p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXhHivCLBwc
1440p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf6lpFmCKGQ
4k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuViSYChy7Q

 

[railven]

Any benches of gtx1080 in DX12 Hitman available ?

In the link you quoted it has Hitman DX12 @ 3 resolutions.

(Though what is up with that video quality, woof!)

 

[Silverforce11]

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru.../72619-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-review-21.html

See, again with the BS numbers from these clowns.

We all know AMD wrecks NV in that game, they have the 980Ti close to the Fury X. -_-

I'll wait for a more trust worthy site to compare it properly.

 

[Arachnotronic]

Every video card launch we have people shifting their opinions on which review sites are paid off...

Maybe you guys should just stop reading reviews.

I approve this post. Seriously, calling reviewers who are just trying to do their jobs "bought" without any evidence is just low.

 

[Genx87]

See, again with the BS numbers from these clowns.

We all know AMD wrecks NV in that game, they have the 980Ti close to the Fury X. -_-

I'll wait for a more trust worthy site to compare it properly.

Paid off as well?

 

[torlen11cc]

https://youtu.be/kYdzZzSzF2I
2 GTX 980s in SLI is a better performance option in this video.

 

[Face2Face]

@Face2Face
Because most of the standard MOSFETs used on graphics cards are each good for ~25W before they become leaky/overheat.

The 5 phase is for the core, the 1 is for the vram. 200W for the core is going to limit it's OC. If you like to OC, get the custom board with 8-12 phases.

Come on Bro, I understand the Phase arrangement

Let's wait and see what happens under water + modded BIOS. The OG Titan only had 6 power phases and with a modded BIOS were able hit 300w+ under water.

 

[Silverforce11]

Digital foundry
1080p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXhHivCLBwc
1440p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf6lpFmCKGQ
4k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuViSYChy7Q

Excellent review, in-game footage and corresponding frame time graphics in real time.

This is how professional reviews should be done imo.

 

[Silverforce11]

Paid off as well?

I'm not calling them paid off, but HWC's numbers just don't agree with other reputable sites for this review.

Obviously making up numbers is easier than actually doing real benchmarks.

Just look at Digital Foundry's depth, all the effort to do those videos. Hard to accuse them of making it up when their data also matches up well.

 

[Det0x]

OC 980TI vs OC 1080..OC 1080 is 13% faster than OC 980TI

Disappointing..

 

[Spanners]

Come on Bro, I understand the Phase arrangement

Let's wait and see what happens under water + modded BIOS. The OG Titan only had 6 power phases and with a modded BIOS were able hit 300w+ under water.

Yeah it's too general a statement to make (~25W a phase), R9 290 is "just" 5+1 and it can pull 300W+ numbers as well.

Overclocking wise it looks like +200-250 core offset with boost clocks peaking at around 2.1Ghz and fluctuating around 2.0Ghz. That's from the 4-5 reviews I've read so far.

 

[Silverforce11]

@Spanners

I know Hawaii OC very well I had a lot of them for mining and my main one is for gaming.

When pushed, the VRMs get really hot and they have good cooling on them. Mosfets CAN run above 25W per phase, the good ones can run higher, but they lose efficiency so their conversion is poorer and more heat as waste. The crap mosfets could just blow up.

There's a reason all the reference 1080 is doing 2ghz to 2.1ghz OC and it's not cooling related.

It must be either "chip limits" or "power/PCB limits".

 

[Borealis7]

Disappointing..

slap that 980TI's cooler on the 1080 and OC, and then decide.

 

[caswow]

See, again with the BS numbers from these clowns.

We all know AMD wrecks NV in that game, they have the 980Ti close to the Fury X. -_-

I'll wait for a more trust worthy site to compare it properly.

HWC gave the 1080 the value award

 

[Silverforce11]

HWC gave the 1080 the value award

Well they got it for free (not even the MSRP $599). You can't beat free for value!

 

[xAlias]

OC 980TI vs OC 1080..OC 1080 is 13% faster than OC 980TI

Tbh, Battlefield 3 is a 5 year old game. I rather see a head to head OC performance of modern games than older ones where newer architecture is underutilized.

 

[Silverforce11]

Tbh, Battlefield 3 is a 5 year old game. I rather see a head to head OC performance of modern games than older ones where newer architecture is underutilized.

Take any modern game. If the gap is 25%.

980Ti OCs 25%.

It's now ~= a stock 1080.

A 1080 OC 11%, it's now ahead by ~11%, OC v OC.

The point is the reference 1080 doesn't have the same kind of OC % headroom when compared to most 980Ti (which made it kill Fury X due to it's OC potential)!

ps. BF3 numbers btw, the 1080 is ~35% ahead of the reference 980Ti. That's a bigger gap than a lot of games.

 

[omek]

I approve this post. Seriously, calling reviewers who are just trying to do their jobs "bought" without any evidence is just low.

Let's not be head bobbingly naive, there is little to no correlation between someone doing a job and ethics. If your mother Teresa... maybe.

 

[Det0x]

Guru3d: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/nvidia_geforce_gtx_1080_review,30.html

On the topic of the Founders Edition with a 100 USD price premium, let me just say this, it is a marketing fail for Nvidia. It was a bit ill-communicated and despite that, you do not price reference products (as premium as you claim them to be) 100 bucks over the AIB/AIC prices.

...Thing is that Nvidia keeps driving the prices upwards. Typically the high-end class product hovers at the 500 USD marker. Nvidia, when they released it, drove the GTX 980 to 549 USD. The GTX 1080 now starts at 599 USD with the reference Founders Edition at a massive 699 USD. For the Founders Edition, that's pretty bad pricing if you ask me.

World prices then (suggested MSRP for Founders edition):

Serbian Dinar RSD 96,900
Czech Koruna CZK 21,400
Danish Krone DKK 6,150
Germany EUR 789
France EUR 789
British Pound GBP 619
Hungarian Forint HUF 259,850
Norwegian Krone NOK 7,599
Polish Zloty PLN 3,599
Romanian New Lei RON 3,499
Russian Rouble RUB 54,990
Indian Rupee INR 63,250
Swedish Krona SEK 7,699
Turkish Lira TRY 2,850
South African Rand ZAR 13,599
Switzerland CHF 790
UAE AED 2,850
USA USD 699

It has been an ongoing trend for a while now. And remember, this is not the enthusiast SKU, that'll be a GTX 1080 Ti / Titan like product and listen closely... the GTX 980 Ti (enthusiast class) started at 699 USD when released, the same price that Nvidia now launches their Founders Edition at. This is the conundrum and dilemma with the GeForce GTX 1080, not the performance, not the product... but the price level. So this is why I ... Keep it in mind, that's all I'm sayin'. It's all about the money money money, right... Jessie?

 

[Kenmitch]

Anybody find a clock for clock comparison in any of the reviews? Seems more brute force so far too me at least. Would be nice to see a clock for clock comparison with 980 and 980Ti to get a better picture of the underlying architecture. Sure one can read the silly extensive feature BS but in the end fps are really all that matters.