Paul Walker dead

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
It is reckless driving if you are endangering someone's life or the possibility exists.

Unless they were driving at/below the posted limit, the driver endangered Walker's life; that classifies as RECKLESS.


Los Angeles County Sheriff's investigators are still trying to determine the cause of Saturday's crash, which claimed the life of the "Fast & Furious" star and his friend. They have said speed was a factor.

Sheriff's detective Jeff Maag told People magazine the driver "was doing well over 45 [mph] – [it's] fair to say at least twice that."


That means Maag believes Rodas was going at least 90 mph on a street where the limit was just 45.

He added it will take days or weeks to complete the investigation and conclude how fast the car was going and whether mechanical problems caused the crash.

A professional seems to agree with many here that it was no 45mph and 80-90 is reasonable opinion
 
Last edited:

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
48,704
5,456
136

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
I really haven't paid attention to the map of the area where they were driving, but I'd think the only way brakes are going to cause an accident is if you're going to fast to negotiate a bend in the road & are unable to brake. Well, that, or the brakes locking up. But, loss of fluid doesn't generally cause brakes to lock up - just the opposite.
 

T9D

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
5,320
6
0
Yeah I was going to say that has to be like 70 mph or more of a crash. People saying that would happen at 45 are nuts.
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
I really haven't paid attention to the map of the area where they were driving, but I'd think the only way brakes are going to cause an accident is if you're going to fast to negotiate a bend in the road & are unable to brake. Well, that, or the brakes locking up. But, loss of fluid doesn't generally cause brakes to lock up - just the opposite.

If there was some sort of catastrophic failure that flung fluid around on the road and tires I could see that causing a problem. It's happened often enough with race cars. But I don't think a fluid leak is required to explain what happened. It's almost as if people wanted to think it was a low-speed fluke, because how could such a badass driver lose control of his own car? Now they're sort of grudgingly beginning to think that he might have been speeding, but that's no problem for a badass driver, so it must have been something else.

If they were running at a high speed in that car it could have been anything at all. The Porsche memo posted earlier said it would ruin the undershield running over a beer can lying on its side. What would a pothole do at speed? Bottoming out on a hump might be enough to put you off the road by itself.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Mugs. That's a mirror you will need to cross.

I assume that's an idiom in your native language. It doesn't translate.

It's very clear you are poor.

Sure, whatever. I don't discuss my finances here.

I "ain't" no millionaire.

I am not a white knight.

In my life I call myself gray.

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Steinbeck#Disputed

This is indeed about Paul Walker's Money and Fame.

Only to you. The rest of us are talking about what the driver did.

Joe Sixpack crashes daily. He doesn't become Paul Walker doing that. Nor does the world talk about Joe Sixpack doing it, except for his 4 facebook friends.

Find any video of an Joe Sixpack driving dangerously resulting in an accident and post a thread here, you'll see the same negative responses as in this thread. Here you go: http://www.reddit.com/r/roadcam

The only difference when Paul Walker is involved is that the discussion lasts longer because it has been in the news repeatedly and people have been waiting for details from the police.

Kaido it's not your fault, I don't think you are a troller here.

I know some of the people involved in this.

No one can really say if they were speeding.

The police can, and they have.

They may have been, it's really about RECKLESS DRIVING like that asshat on the interstate weaving in and out of near accidents and leaving behind bad ones. I don't think there is many on this forum that never went 20+ mph over a limit at times.

Driving on those roads at the speeds that have been reported is quite reckless.

There really was no explosion at first. They heard a crash and another crash...didn't know it was in their fold and then saw the fire/smoke in the sky.

There was no RECKLESS DRIVING. No one was endangered.

Arguably, Paul Walker was endangered.
 

7window

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2009
1,533
1
0
Kaido it's not your fault, I don't think you are a troller here.

I know some of the people involved in this.

No one can really say if they were speeding. They may have been, it's really about RECKLESS DRIVING like that asshat on the interstate weaving in and out of near accidents and leaving behind bad ones. I don't think there is many on this forum that never went 20+ mph over a limit at times.

There really was no explosion at first. They heard a crash and another crash...didn't know it was in their fold and then saw the fire/smoke in the sky.

There was no RECKLESS DRIVING. No one was endangered.

They are really making this out to power steering, but now I am thinking it may have been brake fluid.

There is a lot of leqal issues at this level that the powers that be and the family are going to hash out.

Porsches go up in smoke a lot...it's rare you have a beloved celebrity (except on AT where Paul Walker that wasn't even driving is fucking playing F&F in real life).

It's sad.

Its called operator error
 

MagickMan

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2008
7,460
3
76
Its called operator error

Yep, I've driven a Carrera GT, I can tell you it's a tricky bitch to drive, very rewarding but unforgiving. It can understeer badly and can be tough to correct for (driving with the throttle is as important as the steering wheel), especially if you're used to cars that tend towards oversteer, like the 911. Compound that with the purity of the thing; no TC or ESC, and it's easy to see what happened. Hell, I spun one out at 100+ mph on a track, I underestimated the amount of mechanical grip the thing had, but luckily didn't hit anything. If I'd been on a road the wreck would have looked a lot like this one.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Yep, I've driven a Carrera GT, I can tell you it's a tricky bitch to drive, very rewarding but unforgiving. It can understeer badly and can be tough to correct for (driving with the throttle is as important as the steering wheel), especially if you're used to cars that tend towards oversteer, like the 911. Compound that with the purity of the thing; no TC or ESC, and it's easy to see what happened. Hell, I spun one out at 100+ mph on a track, I underestimated the amount of mechanical grip the thing had, but luckily didn't hit anything. If I'd been on a road the wreck would have looked a lot like this one.

How long did it take to pry the seat out of your butt cheeks?
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,996
126
Yep, I've driven a Carrera GT, I can tell you it's a tricky bitch to drive, very rewarding but unforgiving. It can understeer badly and can be tough to correct for (driving with the throttle is as important as the steering wheel), especially if you're used to cars that tend towards oversteer, like the 911. Compound that with the purity of the thing; no TC or ESC, and it's easy to see what happened. Hell, I spun one out at 100+ mph on a track, I underestimated the amount of mechanical grip the thing had, but luckily didn't hit anything. If I'd been on a road the wreck would have looked a lot like this one.

Then you have not been within a time zone of a Carrera GT. It's a car with similar weight balance and handling characteristics as a 911 and is noted for the same sort of dangerous OVERSTEER. It won't understeer at any speed.
 

MagickMan

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2008
7,460
3
76
Then you have not been within a time zone of a Carrera GT. It's a car with similar weight balance and handling characteristics as a 911 and is noted for the same sort of dangerous OVERSTEER. It won't understeer at any speed.

That's incorrect. That's the issue with most RMR sports cars (the 911 isn't RMR it's RR), they tend towards understeer, then if/when you overcompensate you get snap oversteer. At that point, without ESC, it's just gone. When you see Tanner Foust drifting one all around the track, that's experience and rigorous setup. If anything, it's a LOT like the Cayman, dialed up to 11, with a side of habaneros.

How long did it take to pry the seat out of your butt cheeks?

I sat there until someone checked on me, still gripping the wheel. I wish I had a picture of the expression on my face. By the end of the weekend I was really comfortable in it though, you just have to realize that its limits are far beyond yours and rely on its grip, then use more throttle, which is counterintuitive with how sane humans think. Even Hamilton and Webber have smashed these before.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
That's incorrect. That's the issue with most RMR sports cars (the 911 isn't RMR it's RR), they tend towards understeer, then if/when you overcompensate you get snap oversteer. At that point, without ESC, it's just gone. When you see Tanner Foust drifting one all around the track, that's experience and rigorous setup. If anything, it's a LOT like the Cayman, dialed up to 11, with a side of habaneros.



I sat there until someone checked on me, still gripping the wheel. I wish I had a picture of the expression on my face. By the end of the weekend I was really comfortable in it though, you just have to realize that its limits are far beyond yours and rely on its grip, then use more throttle, which is counterintuitive with how sane humans think. Even Hamilton and Webber have smashed these before.

I can only imagine. I've been in situations driving where I wasn't in control and I can't even describe the fear that hit me. I can only imagine how it would feel with a machine that powerful but so light. Man...

I've stayed out of this thread because I hate the ignorance that comes with these kinds of threads. Thanks for adding intelligent input.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
It is reckless driving if you are endangering someone's life or the possibility exists.

Unless they were driving at/below the posted limit, the driver endangered Walker's life; that classifies as RECKLESS.




A professional seems to agree with many here that it was no 45mph and 80-90 is reasonable opinion

I hate to disagree with you, but speeding and reckless driving are not the same thing.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,996
126
That's incorrect. That's the issue with most RMR sports cars (the 911 isn't RMR it's RR), they tend towards understeer, then if/when you overcompensate you get snap oversteer. At that point, without ESC, it's just gone. When you see Tanner Foust drifting one all around the track, that's experience and rigorous setup. If anything, it's a LOT like the Cayman, dialed up to 11, with a side of habaneros.


Right, Right.

Find a single review of the car that mentions understeer or a single video of the car leaving the track nose first. There are hundreds of reviews and dozens of crash videos and they all mention oversteer at all points, not a single word about understeer from anyone. But hey, you're driving expertise trumps that of all automotive journalists and test drivers combined.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Right, Right.

Find a single review of the car that mentions understeer or a single video of the car leaving the track nose first. There are hundreds of reviews and dozens of crash videos and they all mention oversteer at all points, not a single word about understeer from anyone. But hey, you're driving expertise trumps that of all automotive journalists and test drivers combined.

This is not really the thread for his brags how he is a top rated boxer and now a top rated driver.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
I can only imagine. I've been in situations driving where I wasn't in control and I can't even describe the fear that hit me. I can only imagine how it would feel with a machine that powerful but so light. Man...

I've stayed out of this thread because I hate the ignorance that comes with these kinds of threads. Thanks for adding intelligent input.

You are saying you are a bad driver, your response is typical...I WAS SCARED!...yet you have been in SITUATIONS, again SCARED...not learning from your mistakes...


The guy behind the wheel in that wreck you are discussing had no fear, he was a professional and was trying his best to correct.

Before any here try to one up me, I am sure at the very end he was upset.

Like John Foley of the Blue Angels says "It's unforgiving", not fear.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |