Naw. Bioshock was to me, boring, claustrophobic (personal taste here), unclever.
I bought it and never finished it. I was not impressed with the Ayn Rand philosophical elements in the story, it was sort of basic... Ayn Rand's books made me think in new ways... Bioshock did not. All Bioshock did to me was extract some basic principles from objectivist philosophy and build a game story around those elements...
Crysis on the other hand, HAS impressed me a fair bit. It has given me that coveted "wowww" factor where I feel immersed in the game, thrust into a new world where I am wandering about in awe, and am affected emotionally by what occurs.
I know a game is good when it hits me so hard I dream about it, or feel exhausted after a tough battle.
Crysis is VERY immersive, the better FOV (vs Demo) that comes with the full version is greatly appreciated too.
I bought it and never finished it. I was not impressed with the Ayn Rand philosophical elements in the story, it was sort of basic... Ayn Rand's books made me think in new ways... Bioshock did not. All Bioshock did to me was extract some basic principles from objectivist philosophy and build a game story around those elements...
Crysis on the other hand, HAS impressed me a fair bit. It has given me that coveted "wowww" factor where I feel immersed in the game, thrust into a new world where I am wandering about in awe, and am affected emotionally by what occurs.
I know a game is good when it hits me so hard I dream about it, or feel exhausted after a tough battle.
Crysis is VERY immersive, the better FOV (vs Demo) that comes with the full version is greatly appreciated too.