woolfe9999
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2005
- 7,164
- 0
- 0
OK first off, this business with the Illinois school board is obviously absurd. Those people are unqualified fools. They seem to want to make some statement in opposition to this law; instead, they are providing Fox News fodder for righties to pontificate about all "those looney liberals." It's a self-defeating "statement." And worse, they are penalizing KIDS FFS.
However, this law is not as benign as some have portrayed here. It isn't limited to vehicle stops. Nowhere does it say that detention and search are limited to those situations incident to a detention for an unrelated charge. And the certainty standard - reasonable suspicion - is de minimus. It requires virtually nothing. Nor does it exclude the person's ethnicity from being a factor.
I oppose this law not out of sympathy for illegals. I oppose it because this is how a police state solves an immigration problem. I'd rather have the authorities target businesses who hire illegals than have cops detaining random people, be it in cars or out in the street.
I know this board is very emotional about illegal immigrants and I have a feeling that there are a number of people here who would support virtually any sort of anti-immigrant legislation, no matter how extreme. However, there are valid libertarian grounds for opposing this kind of state action. One need not be any sort of bleeding heart immigrant lover to not like this. I am not speaking for anyone else who may be opposed to this law, just myself.
- wolf
However, this law is not as benign as some have portrayed here. It isn't limited to vehicle stops. Nowhere does it say that detention and search are limited to those situations incident to a detention for an unrelated charge. And the certainty standard - reasonable suspicion - is de minimus. It requires virtually nothing. Nor does it exclude the person's ethnicity from being a factor.
I oppose this law not out of sympathy for illegals. I oppose it because this is how a police state solves an immigration problem. I'd rather have the authorities target businesses who hire illegals than have cops detaining random people, be it in cars or out in the street.
I know this board is very emotional about illegal immigrants and I have a feeling that there are a number of people here who would support virtually any sort of anti-immigrant legislation, no matter how extreme. However, there are valid libertarian grounds for opposing this kind of state action. One need not be any sort of bleeding heart immigrant lover to not like this. I am not speaking for anyone else who may be opposed to this law, just myself.
- wolf