Is it me or do god rays seem completely pointless to have at anything above low?
All the screenshots I'm looking at have almost no difference in image quality yet there is a massive performance decrease.
Same as NV GameWorks HBAO in Dying Light. Tanks AMD performance by 50%, almost no visual difference.
Even some folks here are blaming AMD when clearly GimpRays tank performance on a 980Ti from 100 fps to 60 fps for negligible visual improvement.
Demand better optimizations from GimpWorks features!
Just like when gamers cried foul over Witcher 3 HairWorks, the developers went back and optimized it, releasing a patch that improved performance without reducing visual quality.
Seriously, who is defending this rubbish? It's acceptable to lose massive FPS for this?
http://images.nvidia.com/geforce-co...-interactive-comparison-003-ultra-vs-low.html
Guess which one just lowered your performance massively even on Maxwell?
OR is it this?
This was a parody before the game's launch, I thought it was humorous but at least I was expecting there to be some major visual improvement for the performance loss (HairWorks on creatures in Witcher 3 for example).