I'd really like to understand how the Pentagon can claim they are ensuring these people "are prosecuted before regularly constituted courts affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized by civilized people" if they will allowed coerced or hearsay evidence. Those two allowances go against the judicial guarantees in pretty much all civilized countries. And giving the government the right to disallow presentation of defense evidence is going to make it impossible for these people to get a fair trial.
Why don't we just take them all out and shoot them now? Why waste the time, effort and money on a complete sham of a kangaroo court.
http://apnews.myway.com//article/20070118/D8MNS0RO0.html
Why don't we just take them all out and shoot them now? Why waste the time, effort and money on a complete sham of a kangaroo court.
http://apnews.myway.com//article/20070118/D8MNS0RO0.html
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Pentagon has drafted a manual for upcoming detainee trials that would allow suspected terrorists to be convicted on hearsay evidence and coerced testimony and imprisoned or put to death.
According to a copy of the manual obtained by The Associated Press, a terror suspect's defense lawyer cannot reveal classified evidence in the person's defense until the government has a chance to review it.
The manual, sent to Capitol Hill on Thursday and scheduled to be released later by the Pentagon, is intended to track a law passed last fall by Congress restoring President Bush's plans to have special military commissions try terror-war prisoners. Those commissions had been struck down earlier in the year by the Supreme Court.
Last September, Congress - then led by Republicans - sent Bush a bill granting wide latitude in interrogating and detaining captured enemy combatants. The legislation also prohibited some of the worst abuses of detainees like mutilation and rape, but granted the president leeway to decide which other interrogation techniques are permissible.
Passage of the bill, which was backed by the White House, followed more than three months of debate that included angry rebukes by Democrats of the administration's interrogation policies, and a short-lived rebellion by some Republican senators.
The Detainee Treatment Act, separate legislation championed in 2005 by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., prohibited the use of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of military and CIA prisoners. It was approved overwhelmingly by Congress despite a veto threat by Bush, who eventually signed it into law.
The Pentagon manual is aimed at ensuring that enemy combatants - the Bush administration's term for many of the terrorism suspects captured on the battlefield - "are prosecuted before regularly constituted courts affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized by civilized people," according to the document.
As required by law, the manual prohibits statements obtained by torture and "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" as prohibited by the Constitution.
However, the law does allow statements obtained through coercive interrogation techniques if obtained before Dec. 30, 2005, and deemed reliable by a judge.