Originally posted by: sao123
It was not meant to be the equivolent of a "go to hell" of "fvck off", I proposed a repeatable verfiiable scientific experiment to answer the question, with 3 possible outcomes:
a) you die and cease to exist
b) you die and wake up in heaven/hell
c) you die and wake up a cow
thats not a valid scientific experiment and i expect that if you understood the relatively simple concepts behind such a thing that...
I'm neither an abortion clinic bomber, and im not against medicine...but I do take the bible very literally. Genesis, Adam, Eve, Moses, it all happened exactly as its written. I believe the 2nd coming and all the bad things of revelation are forthcoming. I'm not afraid to tell people the truth that unless they repent, they will go to hell.
...well that you wouldnt take the bible so literally. youre basically telling us that you accept anything in that book because someone told you, (probably while you were a child) (but im speculating), that it was true just because and you dont have the ability to think for yourself. i was like that...until i started to go through puberty.
so lets go back to your "experiment"
its not repeatable. basically its just killing people and...what, wishing for a reply? we already have nuts that say they saw god or jesus and came back here and people who say they existed in previous lives as other humans, neither of which you can verify.
Skeptic Carl Sagan asked the Dalai Lama what would he do if a fundamental tenet of his religion (reincarnation) was definitively disproved by science. The Dalai Lama answered; "if science can disprove reincarnation, Tibetan Buddhism would abandon reincarnation... but it's going to be mighty hard to disprove reincarnation." (taken from the wiki article on reincarnation, publlished in one of sagans books)
Basically your argument is "heres something wildly mythical and untestable, but hey, if you can disprove, maybe ill listen"
what a horrible, ignorant way to refer to something as science