How would you get that much blood without killing them first?
thinking about this - for no particular reason and thought of the icicle as a stabbing weapon - but would leave a lot of water right? :thumbsdown:
DNA and finger prints are a bitch. You leave one piece of hair at the crime scene and it will tie you to it.
Ehh, I'd go with a suppressed .22. In an urban or big city area, you don't exactly need a high powered rifle, and the bullet itself is less likely to be traced (if at all) due to it's susceptibility to damage. Even if the did get some distinguishing marks, a barrel swap is cheap and easy enough.Icicle would be a bad choice. With any bladed or pick type melee weapon, there's going to be blood spatter. You may get rid of the murder weapon but there's still ways to tie the crime to you. Especially if it gets on your clothes or shoes. You could burn them, but you'd have to make sure you weren't seen doing so, or even wearing or carrying the bloody items.
I'd personally go with poison. A fast acting one that metabolizes quickly. Difficult to detect during the toxicology screenings. It's also more discrete and leaves little evidence provided you don't obtain it through legal channels.
thinking about this - for no particular reason and thought of the icicle as a stabbing weapon - but would leave a lot of water right? :thumbsdown:
what about an icicle made of your victims blood? :awe:
Hand loaded frozen meat bullets fired into the stomach. When it thaws it will just appear as normal stomach content. I think I saw this somewhere.
I think you're confusing a couple of assassinations. Litvenenko was killed/assassinated with a radioactive isotope of Polonium. The umbrella tip assassination was a tiny pellet (pin head sized) cross drilled & filled with ricin - sealed inside with a substance that would melt at body temperature. It was shot into a Bulgarian dissident who moved to the West. That's probably not the perfect murder weapon either; there was a suspect in the case.Radioactive umbrella tip
I think you're confusing a couple of assassinations. Litvenenko was killed/assassinated with a radioactive isotope of Polonium. The umbrella tip assassination was a tiny pellet (pin head sized) cross drilled & filled with ricin - sealed inside with a substance that would melt at body temperature. It was shot into a Bulgarian dissident who moved to the West. That's probably not the perfect murder weapon either; there was a suspect in the case.
The perfect murder weapon, I think, would be one that's slow acting and not immediately detectable, i.e., no immediate symptoms. Thus, it adds to the difficulty of tracing the cause of death. E.g., what if Stephen Jobs was assassinated by causing him to ingest a chemical that would almost certainly cause pancreatic cancer. Unlike most people, he lived a long time with that cancer, so the death might not have been as quickly as hoped. But, what trace of the carcinogenic substance might remain at the point the cancer was detected? Would that substance even been looked for at the initial diagnosis, or during an autopsy? He could have been murdered, but it looked like natural causes. (I do not believe this to be the case - don't label me a conspiracy nut. But, it would make for an interesting story to spread in the conspiracy nut forums.)
Don't high levels of CO stay in the system?
Steve Jobs was an idiot. He got a cancer that had a 99.9999% survival rate with early detection and surgery. He got it detected early and didn't go for surgery. He thought those "holistic" approaches to medicine would work instead. By the time he got surgery it was way too late. That wasn't murder but Darwinism at work.
Steve Jobs was an idiot. He got a cancer that had a 99.9999% survival rate with early detection and surgery. He got it detected early and didn't go for surgery. He thought those "holistic" approaches to medicine would work instead. By the time he got surgery it was way too late. That wasn't murder but Darwinism at work.
didnt he have kids?... if so explain how that works.
pancreatic cancer has that survival rate?