Well let me tell you something being on the other end:
I work CS for a small e-tailer. It's just one of my many responsibilities as we have a lot of duty overlap.
Whenever someone feels like they want to play hardball with me, it discourages me from helping them. Waiting 9 days for an update does sound a little like "maybe he'll forget" but at the same time, whenever I get a threat of claim / chargeback, before I've even been given a chance to explain my side of things, well... that doesn't sit very well.
You adopted a guilty until proven innocent stance in your second reply to them. The threat of chargeback was an accusation of wrong doing (that is, a second wrong doing of them doing nothing to help you). It's exactly the wrong way around to approach things.
As CS reps, we're human too, and we know you're frustrated. Sometimes mistakes happen. I have little doubt that, given some time, Performance-PCs would have cleared up your issue. After all, they did, and somehow I suspect your threat of chargeback wasn't what spurred them on. Had I been on the receiving end of your emails at my etailer, I would have continued to help you, and would not have labelled you a bad customer or refused to deal with you in the future.
But I would also dislike you. You made it hard not to make it personal. This is business, and you are part of a business transaction. You made it easy to dislike you (and therefore, blur the lines between personal and professional)... it's not really the smartest move when you need help. Now they've adopted the business stance of no longer dealing with you. It's unfortunate, perhaps a little harsh, but that's how it is.
I work CS for a small e-tailer. It's just one of my many responsibilities as we have a lot of duty overlap.
Whenever someone feels like they want to play hardball with me, it discourages me from helping them. Waiting 9 days for an update does sound a little like "maybe he'll forget" but at the same time, whenever I get a threat of claim / chargeback, before I've even been given a chance to explain my side of things, well... that doesn't sit very well.
You adopted a guilty until proven innocent stance in your second reply to them. The threat of chargeback was an accusation of wrong doing (that is, a second wrong doing of them doing nothing to help you). It's exactly the wrong way around to approach things.
As CS reps, we're human too, and we know you're frustrated. Sometimes mistakes happen. I have little doubt that, given some time, Performance-PCs would have cleared up your issue. After all, they did, and somehow I suspect your threat of chargeback wasn't what spurred them on. Had I been on the receiving end of your emails at my etailer, I would have continued to help you, and would not have labelled you a bad customer or refused to deal with you in the future.
But I would also dislike you. You made it hard not to make it personal. This is business, and you are part of a business transaction. You made it easy to dislike you (and therefore, blur the lines between personal and professional)... it's not really the smartest move when you need help. Now they've adopted the business stance of no longer dealing with you. It's unfortunate, perhaps a little harsh, but that's how it is.
Last edited: