Performance Review : Rise of the Tomb Raider

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Techhog

Platinum Member
Sep 11, 2013
2,834
2
26
It really isn't that hard to understand. There is a difference between "bashing" and legitimately discussing the pros and cons of a product. Bashing includes inflammatory remarks that provide nothing constructive to the conversation such as respelling Gameworks as "Gimpworks", calling out "fanboys", wording your post in such a way that it looks like you are yelling, and using strong language.

You are free to discuss the positives and negatives of a technology, but tone down the language. I'm sure you guys are capable of understanding what a constructive conversation versus yelling past each other is.

Moderator Subyman

In other words, we're not allowed to express personal opinions of the technology and can only talk about the tech itself? And the tech is treated like a forum member and thus can't be insulted or called out? I see. I'll make sure to never hurt poor GameWorks' feelings again!

Moderator callout and trolling? Seriously, good bye.

-Rvenger
 
Last edited by a moderator:

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
I love how here you're saying that PC gaming is growing, yet you're always the first to say that desktops and dGPUs are on the way out. Whatever is convenient for your agenda I suppose.

The two are not the same thing. I can buy hundreds of PC games and contribute to the growth of PC gaming and not need to upgrade my PC leading to no growth in hardware sales.
 

Techhog

Platinum Member
Sep 11, 2013
2,834
2
26
I've not seen any actual evidence, just the same allegations repeated over and over again.

If the gameworks program prevents developers from working with amd to optimize they could and should sue nvidia for antitrust, but they haven't.

No, you deny that evidence counts, and will continue to do so unless someone reverse engineers the tech with the help of an Nvidia employee they captured and drugged with a truth serum.
 

xthetenth

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2014
1,800
529
106
Thank goodness for steam refunds in case it doesn't perform on my system. I know I'm running a big screen for my card, but I've gotten decent performance even from recent big games. And if suddenly going with NV did kill performance, then I know who not to reward with my money.
 

Techhog

Platinum Member
Sep 11, 2013
2,834
2
26
You forgot to mention 970 SLI delivers the same. Its a 60FPS capped game. It runs 30fps on console.

And you were wrong. It's not capped. Hopefully that'll teach you to stop always talking in absolutes, but I'm sure it won't.
 

crisium

Platinum Member
Aug 19, 2001
2,643
615
136
http://www.computerbase.de/2016-01/rise-of-the-tomb-raider-benchmarks/2/





Another pointless abuse of tessellation for mostly no visual gains. I bet its running x64 mode.

So for AMD users, forcing it to x16 will bring performance up a lot while looking the same.

Since NV couldn't get HairWorks in, it's just easier to ramp up Tessellation to the max for everything else. lol

I have had my Global Settings force 8x Maximum and have for some time now so as not to deal with excessive tessellation from devs/nvidia. There is a difference between 8x and 16x that you can notice, to be fair, but it's much less than the stark difference between 4x and 8x. I'll take the moderate performance gains over minor IQ advantages.




Tomb Raider is downloading now for me. I'll definitely keep it at 8x since this is a game that already will take a lot of compromises to reach ~60fps at 1440 (even with Freesync I want my average to be at least 60).
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,475
136
It really isn't that hard to understand. There is a difference between "bashing" and legitimately discussing the pros and cons of a product. Bashing includes inflammatory remarks that provide nothing constructive to the conversation such as respelling Gameworks as "Gimpworks", calling out "fanboys", wording your post in such a way that it looks like you are yelling, and using strong language.

You are free to discuss the positives and negatives of a technology, but tone down the language. I'm sure you guys are capable of understanding what a constructive conversation versus yelling past each other is.

Moderator Subyman

Gameworks has affected AMD cards performance in so many games by now that its no more an accident or coincidence. Its intentional harming of the competition by Nvidia at the cost of hurting their own user base. I am not alone as thats how a lot of people feel. We are expressing our condemnation of this behaviour by actually calling what it does to both Nvidia cards and to a stronger extent to AMD cards. Gimp is an insulting reference but Gameworks does insult the PC gaming community and the average PC gamer by hurting performance for what has been shown to be very less tangible improvement in image quality. The large performance loss on enabling Gameworks features is something which even editors of top tech press sites debate and few strongly condemn Nvidia for. This shady business tactic affects even older Nvidia cards and is being used to sell the latest gen hardware. Such a business tactic is even more repulsive. If criticizing Gameworks is not allowed in a Gameworks game performance review thread then where else do you want to do it.
 

Dribble

Platinum Member
Aug 9, 2005
2,076
611
136
Gameworks has affected AMD cards performance in so many games by now that its no more an accident or coincidence. Its intentional harming of the competition by Nvidia at the cost of hurting their own user base. I am not alone as thats how a lot of people feel. We are expressing our condemnation of this behaviour by actually calling what it does to both Nvidia cards and to a stronger extent to AMD cards. Gimp is an insulting reference but Gameworks does insult the PC gaming community and the average PC gamer by hurting performance for what has been shown to be very less tangible improvement in image quality. The large performance loss on enabling Gameworks features is something which even editors of top tech press sites debate and few strongly condemn Nvidia for. This shady business tactic affects even older Nvidia cards and is being used to sell the latest gen hardware. Such a business tactic is even more repulsive. If criticizing Gameworks is not allowed in a Gameworks game performance review thread then where else do you want to do it.

If it hurts performance so much but gives no visual gains then turn it off and forget about it. No need to go on and on and on and on ....
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,355
642
121
If it hurts performance so much but gives no visual gains then turn it off and forget about it. No need to go on and on and on and on ....
Gameworks has never been just about a single feature. Games that feature gameworks have poor performance even with gameworks features turned off.

Surely this isn't a hard concept to understand?

Usually when I see people defend gameworks it's comments like this where they clearly don't fully understand the situation.

Gameworks benefits no one. Not even nvidia users. It lowers performance for all users.... How can people be happy about that?
 
Last edited:

SimianR

Senior member
Mar 10, 2011
609
16
81
Didn't see this posted, but digital Foundry did a comparison between the performance on an R9 390 and GTX 970.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHhPOvlnLGM

Found big performance gaps between the two depending on the scene, but the average fps difference overall was 1fps.

I think it will be interesting to see where performance is at in a few weeks (or months?) when both NVIDIA/AMD have had more time to work on their drivers. The game looks good, but probably not good enough to justify the fairly underwhelming performance the mid range cards are showing.
 
Last edited:

PhonakV30

Senior member
Oct 26, 2009
987
378
136
Added Guru3D's Review & Computerbase's Review to Post 1.

Guru3D

Computerbase

According to Wolfgang (Editor of computerbase)

Simple: In the test scene of PCGH Radeons dying due to overtesselation. We have switched off because it brings nothing, especially in the scene.

Replied to Micha der erste
Very strange your benchmarks! In PCGH a GTX 780 is much faster than doing a R9 390X, but it looks with you very, very different! How do you explain that?
 
Last edited:

Innokentij

Senior member
Jan 14, 2014
237
7
81
This game runs great, putted everything on max 1440p vsync and using SMAA 60 fps with dibs to 52 very rare. The tesstalation is amazing, we talking metro LL level. Very happy with this game.
 

nvgpu

Senior member
Sep 12, 2014
629
202
81
It's about time mods permanently ban the trolls that are spouting the "Gimp" words, they aren't discussing anything, they just want to attack, FUD and slander Nvidia and their Gameworks program that pushes PC gaming forward just because their uncompetitive company is losing badly.

If you don't like to push your PC gaming to highest limits then suggest you buy a console and enjoy your 900P 30FPS or 720P 30FPS gaming and save yourself a few thousand dollars that you would have spent on PC parts, thats more than enough for gaming.
 
Last edited:

crisium

Platinum Member
Aug 19, 2001
2,643
615
136
I'm pleased to find so far that this game is better at sub 60fps than most. My Freesync minimum is 40hz, but in most FPS games I still try to maintain 60fps when possible because first person really benefits from a high framerate regardless of tearing. This game handles motion well and I don't have to chase 60fps like a rapid dog.

I am using the High preset with SMAA, but reduced Shadows to Medium and increased Ambiet Occlusion to HBAO+. I force Max Tessellation to 8X via Crimson. I get 50s and 60s+ when there's not too much stuff going on, but even when there is I still stay within my Freesync range and this game handles 40s and low 50s framerates much better than most.

I think it's due to a lack of frametime spikes, the motion blur, and third person view.
 
Last edited:

xthetenth

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2014
1,800
529
106
It's about time mods permanently ban the trolls that are spout the "Gimp" words, they aren't discussing anything, they just want to attack, FUD and slander Nvidia and their Gameworks program that pushes PC gaming forward just because their uncompetitive company is losing badly.

If you don't like to push your PC gaming to highest limits then suggest you buy a console and enjoy your 900P 30FPS or 720P 30FPS gaming and save yourself a few thousand dollars that you would have spent on PC parts, thats more than enough for gaming.

It's spelled i-r-o-n-y in case anybody asks you. ()

Incidentally the second paragraph is directly in the opposite direction of correct. I want to get more from my hardware rather than less. Sure, I've probably put three grand into my computer at home in the past year, and you know what? I don't want that money to go towards making up for inefficient code, let alone code that just so happens to be inefficient in a way to incentivize using the sponsored hardware. I paid to get performance, I didn't lay out that much money to settle for adequacy.

I'm pleased to find so far that this game is better at sub 60fps than most. My Freesync minimum is 40hz, but in most FPS games I still try to maintain 60fps when possible because first person really benefits from a high framerate regardless of tearing. This game handles motion well and I don't have to chase 60fps like a rapid dog.

I am using the High preset, but reduced Shadows to Medium and increased Ambiet Occlusion to HBAO+. I force Max Tessellation to 8X via Crimson. I get 50s and 60s+ when there's not too much stuff going on, but even when there is I still stay within my Freesync range and this game handles 40s and low 50s framerates much better than most.

I think it's due to a lack of frametime spikes, the motion blur, and third person view.

Good to hear. I want to like the game. Also, how much of a difference does Freesync make? I'm starting to be less and less antipathetic towards vendor lock-in, once the XR341CK drops back down from the stratosphere.
 
Last edited:

Jhatfie

Senior member
Jan 20, 2004
749
2
81
It's about time mods permanently ban the trolls that are spouting the "Gimp" words, they aren't discussing anything, they just want to attack, FUD and slander Nvidia and their Gameworks program that pushes PC gaming forward just because their uncompetitive company is losing badly.

If you don't like to push your PC gaming to highest limits then suggest you buy a console and enjoy your 900P 30FPS or 720P 30FPS gaming and save yourself a few thousand dollars that you would have spent on PC parts, thats more than enough for gaming.

I disagree, although if any banning should take place, maybe it should be to the trolls that passionately defend the abomination known as Gameworks and suggest that everyone but high end PC owners just capitulate and become lowly console gamers.
 

nvgpu

Senior member
Sep 12, 2014
629
202
81
http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/07/15/how-gameworks-makes-building-better-games-faster-and-easier/

Gameworks makes games better, it's not Nvidia's fault the competitor can't release optimized drivers on time, besides we know AMD intentionally games the tessellation factor requests by a game anyway with their control panel cheats to reduce the tessellations workloads.

https://scalibq.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/catalyst-hotfix-11-1a-amd-admits-defeat-in-tessellation/

But hey, anything to attack Nvidia just to make themselves feel better.
 
Last edited:

crisium

Platinum Member
Aug 19, 2001
2,643
615
136
It's a very beautiful game even with some reductions from Max settings. Can't believe I didn't mention that. I'm enjoying the scenes.

Good to hear. I want to like the game. Also, how much of a difference does Freesync make? I'm starting to be less and less antipathetic towards vendor lock-in, once the XR341CK drops back down from the stratosphere.

Freesync is great, but it can't save you from inconsistent frame times and some games really need a high framerate regardless to feel smooth. So I normally still try to maintain as close to 60fps minimum in most games. Luckily this game seems spot in with frame times and is smooth in lower (40-59) framerates. But not having to worry about screen tearing is nice. And even in games where I consistently get over 60fps but nowhere near 144fps I have experimented with Freesync on/off and it is somewhat smoother on so it's worthwhile to invest in Free/G Sync I'd say - though vendor lock is not desirable.
 

Erenhardt

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2012
3,251
105
101
http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/07/15/how-gameworks-makes-building-better-games-faster-and-easier/

Gameworks makes games better, it's not Nvidia's fault the competitor can't release optimized drivers on time, besides we know AMD intentionally games the tessellation factor requests by a game anyway with their control panel cheats to reduce the tessellations workloads.

https://scalibq.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/catalyst-hotfix-11-1a-amd-admits-defeat-in-tessellation/

But hey, anything to attack Nvidia just to make themselves feel better.

Yea! Nvidia spent their valuable resources for all gamers to enjoy better graphics in this game. At least show some appreciation for their effort.

It's a very beautiful game even with some reductions from Max settings. Can't believe I didn't mention that. I'm enjoying the scenes..

Take notes from this guy and enjoy. Don't let your brand loyalism blind you from the beauty of this game powered by nvidia technology.

If you are not happy with how your product performs in certain situations, then make a better decisions.
 

Zodiark1593

Platinum Member
Oct 21, 2012
2,230
4
81
If DX 12 is a low level api, it would make sense that it isn't (yet) on the pc platform due to the different layout between consoles and PC.
 

TheELF

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2012
3,990
744
126
Gameworks has never been just about a single feature. Games that feature gameworks have poor performance even with gameworks features turned off.

Surely this isn't a hard concept to understand?

Usually when I see people defend gameworks it's comments like this where they clearly don't fully understand the situation.

Gameworks benefits no one. Not even nvidia users. It lowers performance for all users.... How can people be happy about that?

What exactly is it about the gaming market of today that confuses you?
Devs are concentrating on consoles because of less piracy=more sells,almost every dev rushes the PC ports using the minimum amount of resources possible, so if there is a tool kit of pre compiled libraries to "pimp up" their games and make it look like they made more of an effort of course they are going to jump on it,no questions asked.

It's just like saying that games made with a game maker (rpg maker and the likes) run like crap,of course they do because no amount of coding goes into them,same here they just recompile (not even) the same code adding a bunch of pre made effects = instant cash, and they can "honestly" claim that they made the PC version "better" than consoles.

I don't like it either but I can understand why a dev wouldn't want to throw money on a project he knows will only have moderate sells.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
So no FPS cap is good news to me personally. I just want to find some reliable SLI scaling results. Even without it though, a well OC'd 980ti should render the game playable @ 1440p. I might actually consider this one. It would be something different for me.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
If DX 12 is a low level api, it would make sense that it isn't (yet) on the pc platform due to the different layout between consoles and PC.

Xbox One isn't using DX12 yet for games. It only got support in mid november from the OS side if I recall right with the "Windows 10 for console" update.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |