- Sep 4, 2003
- 7,987
- 93
- 91
I think it's ridiculous that the boy was allowed to fire the gun, regardless of supervision.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...y-death-gun-show_N.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n...y-death-gun-show_N.htm
Why the son? He was only 8, not capable of any thinking except, "cool! i get to shoot a big gun."Originally posted by: ScottyB
Who gets the Darwin award? Father or son?
the USA.Originally posted by: ScottyB
Who gets the Darwin award? Father or son?
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Why the son? He was only 8, not capable of any thinking except, "cool! i get to shoot a big gun."Originally posted by: ScottyB
Who gets the Darwin award? Father or son?
From the article, the kid "was shooting the weapon down range when the force of the weapon made it travel up and back toward his head . . . " It sounds like automatic. Come to think of it, more people could've been hurt.Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Ownership is one thing, allowing someone who doesn't have those papers fire it is another no?
Originally posted by: ScottyB
Who gets the Darwin award? Father or son?
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Ownership is one thing, allowing someone who doesn't have those papers fire it is another no?
I'm pretty sure as long as you have permission from the owner (and not a felon I assume), you can fire one.
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Ownership is one thing, allowing someone who doesn't have those papers fire it is another no?
I'm pretty sure as long as you have permission from the owner (and not a felon I assume), you can fire one.
Does that make the gun owner liable? I would think that is the case.
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Ownership is one thing, allowing someone who doesn't have those papers fire it is another no?
I'm pretty sure as long as you have permission from the owner (and not a felon I assume), you can fire one.
Does that make the gun owner liable? I would think that is the case.
I wouldn't think so. If someone borrows your bicycle and gets killed, are you liable?
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Ownership is one thing, allowing someone who doesn't have those papers fire it is another no?
I'm pretty sure as long as you have permission from the owner (and not a felon I assume), you can fire one.
Does that make the gun owner liable? I would think that is the case.
I wouldn't think so. If someone borrows your bicycle and gets killed, are you liable?
You don't think this is a bit different?
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Ownership is one thing, allowing someone who doesn't have those papers fire it is another no?
I'm pretty sure as long as you have permission from the owner (and not a felon I assume), you can fire one.
Does that make the gun owner liable? I would think that is the case.
I wouldn't think so. If someone borrows your bicycle and gets killed, are you liable?
You don't think this is a bit different?
Or if you knowingly lend your car to an unlicensed person, who then gets hurt or hurts someone else . . .Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: LS8
Originally posted by: sdifox
wait, the uzi was on rock and roll??? thought that was outlawed sometime ago?
Class 3 firearms (full automatic and silenced) are perfectly legal in the USA if you meet the ownership requirements and have the correct tax stamps.
Ownership is one thing, allowing someone who doesn't have those papers fire it is another no?
I'm pretty sure as long as you have permission from the owner (and not a felon I assume), you can fire one.
Does that make the gun owner liable? I would think that is the case.
I wouldn't think so. If someone borrows your bicycle and gets killed, are you liable?
Originally posted by: Mermaidman
Or if you knowingly lend your car to an unlicensed person, who then gets hurt or hurts someone else . . .