Days before the Phillies canceled Pete Rose Weekend, court documents were released showing that a woman had accused Pete Rose of having sex with her when he was in his mid-30s and she was not yet 16. But that’s not the most alarming part. The most alarming part is that when Pete Rose was asked about it, he said he was pretty sure she
was 16, not
under 16. (The age of 16 was, conveniently, the “age of consent” in the state where the girl lived.) So, yes, “one of the greatest baseball players of all time” admitted to having sex with a child. Oh, and he was married with two children at the time. But, hey, details.
The allegation came up in a defamation case Pete Rose filed against John Dowd, the former Major League Baseball special counsel in charge of the investigation into Rose’s gambling. The lawsuit centered on remarks Dowd made on a Philly-area radio show in 2015.
While on the air, Dowd said that Pete Rose pal Michael Bertolini “told us that not only did he run bets, but he ran young girls for [Pete Rose] down in spring training, ages 12 to 14 … Isn’t that lovely? So that’s statutory rape every time you do that.”