He wasn’t determined to stop him considering I’m not aware of any action he took to, you know, stop him.
He sent some inappropriate texts on his work phone. We all know of wouldn’t matter if it were about a mob boss he was investigating or whatever, it’s because republicans want to take him out for being anti-Trump.
The bummer is that it wasn't a convicted criminal and foreign collaborator. It really sucks to have to go through the whole evidence, prosecution, defense thing. Maybe someday we'll get past that and just be able to ruin people with an accusation. Oh wait...
The problem is our system was never made to deal with partisanship at this level. Congress isn’t interested in investigating criminal activity by the president, they are interstated in preventing it.
A combination of expressing zealous admiration towards one person they investigated, and let off before interviewing, VS expressing raw seething hatred for the other subject under investigation. Both Presidential candidates and one of whom they vowed to stop. The former got off on the premise of ignorance of the law, though that has never an acceptable excuse for anyone else. For the latter they ended up using intel paid for by the other candidate, delivered from a foreign agent, and provided by the Kremlin.
The full bonafide facts of how the FBI handled the 2016 election are quite astonishing.
You managed to work racism into that pretty quickly. Is that the the thinking now, anyone that doesn't fall into line is a raciest? Am I supposed to defend myself at this point or what?You say that as you ignore the fact that the FBI already has reams of tapes regarding conversations of the publicly known criminals (Russian mafia) that lived in apartments in Trump tower, for decades plus.
Like somehow, for some reason, they weren't already onto Trump.
You say these things, without the basest sprinkling of common sense. It's not funny because it's just fucking sad, really. We know this shit. Everyone knows it. You just don't give a fuck.
You and your family pretty much hated everything about Trump, and people like Trump, up to and including ~6 years ago. Suddenly, he's the greatest thing. ...I guess because he isn't the black guy.
He is here to erase the awful presence of the black guy from your memory, right? Is that it? That must be it...there is no other rational reason that an educated, mature adult would support the raging lunacy of a 12 year-old in old-man skin, like we have with this Orange sack of shit. There isn't a single fucking reason.
Unless you truly are a moron. Are you a moron? Do you admit to that? It's a simple question.
Zealous admiration? Which orifice did you pull that out of? From this link that you will never hear about from conservative media sources:A combination of expressing zealous admiration towards one person they investigated, and let off before interviewing, VS expressing raw seething hatred for the other subject under investigation. Both Presidential candidates and one of whom they vowed to stop. The former got off on the premise of ignorance of the law, though that has never an acceptable excuse for anyone else. For the latter they ended up using intel paid for by the other candidate, delivered from a foreign agent, and provided by the Kremlin.
The full bonafide facts of how the FBI handled the 2016 election are quite astonishing.
Across the months of texts, Strzok and Page dismiss nearly everyone in politics who comes to their attention. Strzok complains that former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson pushes “a wildly liberal interpretation of immigration responsibilities.” Page “hope Paul Ryan fails and crashes in a blaze of glory” and says former top counterterrorism official Richard Clarke “is an uninformed douche.” Strzok finds it “wildly offensive” that former Attorney General Eric Holder’s portrait is hung next to one of Elliot Richardson, who resigned in the Saturday Night Massacre. Later, when Holder speaks at the Democratic National Convention, he urges Page, “Oh God, Holder! Turn it off turn it off turn it off!!!!” Strzok tells Page, “i LOATHE Congress.” A month later, she says, “God i hate Congress. So utterly worthless.” Strzok replies, “Less than worthless. Contemptible.” They aren’t fans of Ted Cruz. The veteran political trickster Roger Stone “is horrible,” he says. At one point, the two fiercely debate Dreamers.
Among the few exceptions are Barack Obama and his family, and Joe Biden. During Michelle Obama’s DNC speech, Page writes, “God, she’s an incredibly impressive woman. The Obamas in general, really. While he has certainly made mistakes, I’m proud to have had him as my president.” She also says, “I really really like Joe Biden.” Strzok replies, “Was literally grabbing phone to say Joe’s doing great!” There is praise for the centrist conservative columnists David Brooks and Andrew Sullivan, too.
Strzok and Page especially detested Trump, who they call an “utter idiot” and complain about in many texts. “Trump is a disaster. l have no idea how destabilizing his Presidency would be,” Strzok says. But that doesn’t translate into much affection for Hillary Clinton. Strzok calls himself a “conservative Dem,” and grudgingly acknowledges in March 2016 that he’d vote for Clinton over Trump. (A colleague had him pegged as a John Kasich voter, he said.) But Strzok also says, "I’m worried about what happens if HRC is elected.” He complains that a fact-checker dismissed Bernie Sanders’s criticism of Clinton as too close to fossil-fuel lobbyists even though “everything Sanders said about Clinton is true … This is clear and utter bias by the media especially the NYTIMES, WAPO, and CNN who if you look at all of them have large donors for Clinton. The fact citing source they used is owed by a newspaper which publically endorsed Clinton.”
A combination of expressing zealous admiration towards one person they investigated, and let off before interviewing, VS expressing raw seething hatred for the other subject under investigation. Both Presidential candidates and one of whom they vowed to stop.
The former got off on the premise of ignorance of the law, though that has never an acceptable excuse for anyone else.
For the latter they ended up using intel paid for by the other candidate, delivered from a foreign agent, and provided by the Kremlin.
Zealous admiration? Which orifice did you pull that out of? From this link that you will never hear about from conservative media sources:
Strzok expressed "zealous admiration" for Hillary Clinton? Where was that in the IG report? IIRC, he and Page took digs at Bernie Sanders and Trump but that doesn't make them full on Clinton zealots. If anything, they took great care not to let either investigation leak. Words pale in comparison to actions, and they took no action to help Clinton or hurt Trump.A combination of expressing zealous admiration towards one person they investigated, and let off before interviewing, VS expressing raw seething hatred for the other subject under investigation. Both Presidential candidates and one of whom they vowed to stop. The former got off on the premise of ignorance of the law, though that has never an acceptable excuse for anyone else. For the latter they ended up using intel paid for by the other candidate, delivered from a foreign agent, and provided by the Kremlin.
The full bonafide facts of how the FBI handled the 2016 election are quite astonishing.
Strzok and Page seemed to treat their jobs like Mystery Science Theater. They shared 50,000 texts in 2 years! How could they have been productive FBI agents? A lot of taxpayer money was wasted on their salaries.
Strzok and Page seemed to treat their jobs like Mystery Science Theater. They shared 50,000 texts in 2 years! How could they have been productive FBI agents? A lot of taxpayer money was wasted on their salaries.
Strzok and Page seemed to treat their jobs like Mystery Science Theater. They shared 50,000 texts in 2 years! How could they have been productive FBI agents? A lot of taxpayer money was wasted on their salaries.
In your world is the FBI the chicken or the egg?How the fuck did we ever end up with a President who finds it necessary to attack the FBI? How did this become normal?
You asked how and then claim you know how because they wasted a lot of Taxpayer dollars. How do you know that? You have no proof your just making shit up ie fake news.
It is not clear how many texts the inspector general's office has recovered from the missing period. Sessions has said that outside of the five-month span, more than 50,000 texts that were exchanged between the two officials have been collected and scrutinized by the office.
Across the months of texts, Strzok and Page dismiss nearly everyone in politics who comes to their attention. Strzok complains that former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson pushes “a wildly liberal interpretation of immigration responsibilities.” Page “hope Paul Ryan fails and crashes in a blaze of glory” and says former top counterterrorism official Richard Clarke “is an uninformed douche.” Strzok finds it “wildly offensive” that former Attorney General Eric Holder’s portrait is hung next to one of Elliot Richardson, who resigned in the Saturday Night Massacre. Later, when Holder speaks at the Democratic National Convention, he urges Page, “Oh God, Holder! Turn it off turn it off turn it off!!!!” Strzok tells Page, “i LOATHE Congress.” A month later, she says, “God i hate Congress. So utterly worthless.” Strzok replies, “Less than worthless. Contemptible.” They aren’t fans of Ted Cruz. The veteran political trickster Roger Stone “is horrible,” he says. At one point, the two fiercely debate Dreamers.
Among the few exceptions are Barack Obama and his family, and Joe Biden. During Michelle Obama’s DNC speech, Page writes, “God, she’s an incredibly impressive woman. The Obamas in general, really. While he has certainly made mistakes, I’m proud to have had him as my president.” She also says, “I really really like Joe Biden.” Strzok replies, “Was literally grabbing phone to say Joe’s doing great!” There is praise for the centrist conservative columnists David Brooks and Andrew Sullivan, too.
This isn't a lot of texts. First of all a lot of texts are confirmatory "yes, ok, thanks, got it, etc".Strzok and Page seemed to treat their jobs like Mystery Science Theater. They shared 50,000 texts in 2 years! How could they have been productive FBI agents? A lot of taxpayer money was wasted on their salaries.
I was incorrect about the timeframe, it was 50k texts within a 5 month span.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/25/politics/justice-department-missing-texts/index.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...cipal-loyalty-is-to-the-bureau-itself/552686/
Nice story bro. I see your sliding back to your usual diversions.A combination of expressing zealous admiration towards one person they investigated, and let off before interviewing, VS expressing raw seething hatred for the other subject under investigation. Both Presidential candidates and one of whom they vowed to stop. The former got off on the premise of ignorance of the law, though that has never an acceptable excuse for anyone else. For the latter they ended up using intel paid for by the other candidate, delivered from a foreign agent, and provided by the Kremlin.
The full bonafide facts of how the FBI handled the 2016 election are quite astonishing.
That's where the screw up is. Period.My comments about this really have nothing specifically to do with either the Hillary Clinton email investigation or the Russia counterintelligence probe. When the FBI is investigating a political figure, it is necessary to keep certain communications outside of the public space.
Is this the witch hunt trump has been referring to?
Seems like a partisan political sacrifice to me. At best this is an internal discipline, at best.
This isn't a lot of texts. First of all a lot of texts are confirmatory "yes, ok, thanks, got it, etc".
Also texting has progressively replaced simply picking up the phone and calling people. So you're saying they are wasting time texting but if you heard they spend some number of hours talking on the phone (pick whatever number you want) one would say they were wasting time talking on the phone.
The reality is they are agents in the same Dept and part of their job is communication.
In your world is the FBI the chicken or the egg?
Also I struggle why I should give a flying fuck if they didn’t like Trump. I doubt FBI agents like the mobsters they investigate either but if someone tried to use that as a criminal defense they would be laughed at.
If you can show me something they DID PROFESSIONALLY that was biased or unfair to Trump I’m very interested to hear that. If not, stop whining.
Obviously this is not directed at you.
Shsh! Don't talk about the NYC FBI anti-Clinton bias.Also I struggle why I should give a flying fuck if they didn’t like Trump. I doubt FBI agents like the mobsters they investigate either but if someone tried to use that as a criminal defense they would be laughed at.
If you can show me something they DID PROFESSIONALLY that was biased or unfair to Trump I’m very interested to hear that. If not, stop whining.
Obviously this is not directed at you.
Your apparently fixated on Trump but they were flinging poo at everybody during their texts. They should know better to do that on company time/communication devices etc...