coercitiv
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2014
- 6,403
- 12,864
- 136
Not only that, but the jump from 1C to 2C CPUs was by far the greatest in system responsiveness: even back at the start, having a 2.6Ghz Athlon 64 was worse than using 2Ghz Athlon 64 X2, and that was a 30% clock difference. Nowadays the entry level CPU from both Intel and AMD offer so much perf/dollar over ancient hardware that it's simply not worth to spend money on anything older than Haswell Pentium or FM2 Athlon X4.Yea, I dont get this obsession with purchasing ancient hardware. Even the cheapest big core celeron or even a single module AMD apu, hell, probably even a cat core 5300 would be faster than a single core phenom. Just buy a modern cpu.
Even the bastion of ST perf usage, the infamous Firefox is currently switching to an optimized MT model: they finally isolated UI process from render, and future builds will also feature separate process for each tab. With the modernization of the last important browser I struggle to think of any other piece of software used in daily activities that requires good CPU performance and is still using a ST model.
Just for giggles I limited my HTPC to 1 core and looked at CPU utilization after login - the system loads just 2 programs - a media server and and a torrent client:
- 1 core @ 4Ghz - 100% load when the 2 programs started
- 2 cores @ 3.5Ghz - 90% load and the load time was significantly shorter, even with the frequency handicap
- 4 cores @ 4Ghz - 55% load