SP33Demon
Lifer
- Jun 22, 2001
- 27,928
- 142
- 106
Many would agree, Shaq COULD/WOULD HAVE WON WITHOUT KOBE. Do you deny that Shaq is unstoppable? Give him TMAC/AI/Baron Davis/J.Kidd. Kobe is replaceable and can be shut down by many teams. Shaq cannot, which is why teams resort to Hack a Shaq. It's not that hard to understand. This is the exact reason why one of them has to go, and all of the early indicators are that it's Kobe.Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
It's not stupid. Since Shaq > Kobe, replace Kobe with AI/TMac/Baron/J.Kidd/<insert good guard here> and they win it all. Nobody in the league can guard Shaq, he is unstoppable. Do you disagree with this? Many people can and have shut down Kobe, he is not the immovable force. Ever heard of "Hack a Kobe"? Hell no.Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If your definition of "champion" is winning a championship, then so be it. Take Shaq away and he wouldn't be a "champion", it's that simple. Think Allen Iverson in his MVP year, if he had Shaq instead of Mutombo he too would have been a "champion". Or Rip Hamilton with the Wizards if they had Shaq... comparing Kobe to MJ is hilarious though, I love how some above poster claims his shot against UTAH was a "fraud" ahahhahaahhah and he pushed off. Kobe would be lucky to hit a shot of that magnitude with that much on the line!!!Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
i love these arbitrary ideas of what is and is not a champion.
bottom line Kobe was a significant factor in the Lakers winning 3 championships, hence he is a champion. any other definition is just arbitrary and stupid
Say what you want, but after this series Kobe/MJ comparison will finally stop. How do you lose with the DIESEL ON YOUR TEAM scoring 30/game!?? Absolutely fricking pathetic, I read in the paper the other day about how this series is probably the biggest upset in the NBA since 1974 and Golden State...
and how many did shaq win without Kobe??
so does that mean Shaq isn't a champion? btw, how many did MJ win without Pippen?
that "without shaq" excuse is stupid. Ok, so you could say that Fox without Shaq or Kobe would never have won a championship, i can see that as he was no more than a marginal role player. but to think that Kobe is on the same level as Fox is plain stupid.
how many would Magic have won without Kareem?? or vice versa?
Hence, Kobe could NOT have won without Shaq (but maybe later if he matures like MJ did). Shaq COULD HAVE won without Kobe with any of the aforementioned names, or somebody arguably just as good as Kobe.
The same formula applies to MJ and Pippen, MJ > Pippen, so Pippen was replaceable. Magic and Kareem were BOTH the BEST at their respective positions, so you could have probably replaced either with a lesser and either would have carried their respective team. Together they were just like the All Star Team, nobody in the league could stop either!
and you know this how??
:roll:
MJ NEVER won without Pippen. Shaq NEVER won without Kobe. Kareem won ONCE without Magic. Magic NEVER won without Kareem. . . .
what you say is pure speculation and proves nothing.
bottom line, Kobe is a champion because he won 3.
If your definition of champion is winning a ring, then yes, Devean George is a "champion" as well. IMO Kobe is not a true champion, he's a good player who was dck riding Shaq to his rings. He finally faces a good team (Detroit) and folds like a deck of cards, and that's with the greatest center of our era to boot. You can argue GAME 2 GAME 2 all you want like the other LA schleps, but he will eventually hit a shot at the end after missing x amount of game ending shots. The media only highlights the ones he hits, not the numerous others he miserably choked on. (Houston series and his airball comes to mind, or Game 3 of this series).