Originally posted by: poopaskoopa
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: poopaskoopa
Ben Wallace should be suspended for being a crybaby, Stephen Jackson should be suspended even longer for being a thug. About Artest, I'm not sure. It was an unnecessary foul, but I've been fouled harder, and I wish Wallace had sucked it up, but I guess Artest should get whatever penalty that comes with the most severe flagrant foul. It's too bad that these "fans" can't be put into a small room with the players to go one-on-one.
I have to side with the players when they react to people throwing stuff at them, assuming that they're going after the right guy(it's very likely that they're going after the wrong guy, however). It's like at the bars. You talk smack to/pour stuff on another man, you're on your own.
How can you say Stephen Jackson deserves to be suspended for being a thug but Artest should only be suspended for his foul? Artest was the one who ran into the stands and tried to beat up a fan.
And I agree that you get what is coming to you if you act like some of the fans at the game did tonight. That being said, you don't walk away scott-free from an incident like this. If you get in a fight at a bar and the cops bust you, you are headed to jail. Why is this any different?
Artest was provoked. S. Jackson went up to the stands looking for someone to punch. That's what it looked like on the video.
Jackson went after the guy that threw a drink at them while they were in the stands.