Pit Bulls attack 72 yr old woman

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

newmachineoverlord

Senior member
Jan 22, 2006
484
0
0
Originally posted by: pyonir
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: Oceandevi
Originally posted by: CKent
We can't be a free nation if a breed of dog is banned, but we can increase punishment for negligent owners.

This is a retarded statement. On many levels. I cant own a freaking bear can I? I must live in freaking red china!

bolded the stupid piece..

I'm pretty sure your constitution allows you to keep a bear. Or at least his arms.

damn, I think that's the funniest thing I've ever read from you.

:thumbsup: and it was pretty funny too

:thumbsup: That is the funniest thing I've seen all day, and I've been to the LHC webcam already.
 

hanoverphist

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2006
9,928
23
76
Originally posted by: fishjie
whoa why drag china into this. china is awesome. they probably ban pitbulls because they realize theyre a horrible breed. i like how the attacks are blamed on the owners. do bear owners get blamed when the bear mauls someone, or does the bear? use common sense now ppl. if you really want to argue its the owners fault, fine, give them life imprisonment for any pitbull attacks, and see who still wants to own a pitbull.

it is ther responsibility of the owner to ensure the safety of others at the hands of their pet. he knew the dog was a pit bull, and there are certain precautions he needed to take, such as special training, restraint and such. ignorance of the law is not an excuse he can hide behind. when i got an iguana, i read up on how to care for him. he should have had the same sense where his dog was concerned.
 

EGGO

Diamond Member
Jul 29, 2004
5,505
1
0
Originally posted by: theGlove

from the article link:
"I just don't understand why they'd go and attack. They've never attacked anybody, even people who came over and stuff," Travis Cunningham Jr. told the television station.

such a sad story, hope she pulls through ok

Funny, same thing goes with any human, too. "He was always so quiet. Always so nice. Kept to himself. I have no idea what got into him." Luckily some of them do us a favor and instead go the route of suicide, eh?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,819
29,571
146
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: zinfamous
oh boy! another pit bull thread, filled with the same uninformed BS we've come to expect.

READ

So having sat down and read all 5 pages of this, allow me to summarize:

The article spends an exhaustive amount of time on categorization. Whether Pit Bulls are in fact the most dangerous breed or not. However, in all this long winded approach, the article never once attempts to label Pit Bulls as anything other than a dangerous and aggressive breed. It only makes a point to state that they are loyal and that the bite statistics for them fluctuate from year to year with other dangerous breeds.

So based on your article we've established that, yes, Pit Bulls are dangerous. Now we have to ask exactly how dangerous?

"Pit bulls, descendants of the bulldogs used in the nineteenth century for bull baiting and dogfighting, have been bred for ?gameness,? and thus a lowered inhibition to aggression. Most dogs fight as a last resort, when staring and growling fail. A pit bull is willing to fight with little or no provocation. Pit bulls seem to have a high tolerance for pain, making it possible for them to fight to the point of exhaustion. Whereas guard dogs like German shepherds usually attempt to restrain those they perceive to be threats by biting and holding, pit bulls try to inflict the maximum amount of damage on an opponent. They bite, hold, shake, and tear. They don?t growl or assume an aggressive facial expression as warning. They just attack. ?They are often insensitive to behaviors that usually stop aggression,? one scientific review of the breed states. ?For example, dogs not bred for fighting usually display defeat in combat by rolling over and exposing a light underside. On several occasions, pit bulls have been reported to disembowel dogs offering this signal of submission.? In epidemiological studies of dog bites, the pit bull is overrepresented among dogs known to have seriously injured or killed human beings, and, as a result, pit bulls have been banned or restricted in several Western European countries, China, and numerous cities and municipalities across North America. Pit bulls are dangerous."

Ok, so apparently the answer, again from your article, is pit bulls are very. fucking. dangerous. Do I even need to discuss this? It's pretty damning evidence in it's own right. We've got a breed that will attack without warning, meaning there is very little chance of the owner being able to correct the behavior before is too late, but more on the owners later. On top of that, once it has attacked, it's going for the kill. Point being is that there are other aggressive breeds that are a lot less dangerous when it actually comes to the attack.

Now, the article's suggestion, instead of banning Pit Bulls, was greater punishment for the owner. I don't disagree with this. However the amount of work they suggested doing, checking on the dog, reprimanding the owner, neutering the dog at the states cost, etc all come across pretty ridiculous when we are talking about trying to do everything possible to make a species bred for killing acceptable as a house pet. They basically suggested that we treat pit bull owners like they are on probation with cops rolling past their house to make sure their dog hasn't killed anyone today.

So let's talk about the owner. It comes up time and time again that despite Pit Bulls being bred for destruction, that it is often the owner that teaches them all these awful killing techniques or perhaps the owner's lack of teaching. But face it, the majority of dog owners are not Cesar Millan. All it takes is one person in the house to be bad at training the dog (and bad doesn't mean they train it to attack stuffed dummies of children) to create many bad habits for a dog, even one that has been through obedience school. Very few dogs are well trained across the grand spectrum, so at the end of the day we are putting a lot of faith into the dogs breed first and foremost. And what do we already know about a Pit Bulls?

the point of the article, which you missed, is that banning pit bulls is no more relevant than banning the various other breeds of dangerous dogs.

1: how do you ban a breed which no one can clearly define?
2: all that you get from the years of bite and attack data is that the most popular dogs have the most attacks. This is quite obvious, and pit bulls have been popular for a long time.

Pit bulls, historically, have been selected against attacking humans. As was already posted in here, fight dogs were traditionally fighting in a ring, with their human handlers next to them. They, more than any other dog, were conditioned to avoid humans.

Yes, ghetto trash has altered that practice, and far more irresponsible owners have taken over this "industry," but genetically, it is not the case that pit bulls have an instinct to attack humans.

These attacks are the result of moron owners.

 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,929
142
106
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Owners of the breed should be required to attend dog obedience classes.
Agree with this. Although I know pitbulls who are the sweetest dogs and have never shown an ounce of aggression. It depends on the dog.

 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Pitbulls are horribly untrainably stupid in my experience.

A food aggressive or territorial aggressive pitbull is more dangerous than say... a toy poodle for obvious reasons.

3 Breeds make up 75% of dog related fatal attacks...

Pitbulls
Rotts
Dobermans
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,713
12
56
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: moshquerade
That's a copout and you know it.

Not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor. FFS, there are medical journals online, but we don't want to take any of that information as logical or conclusive based on scientific studies BECAUSE WE CAN ACCESS IT ON THE INTERNET!
Scientific principles and medical procedures are generally antiseptic discussions. The measurement methods of dog intelligence and the rankings you refer to are highly controversial, first of all. Then there's the emotionally charged aspect of the discussion whenever pit bulls are brought up. So we aren't talking about medical journals here. While not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor the vast amount of it is certainly up for debate and pointing to a single finding that ranks intelligence by breed certainly does not settle that debate.

As an example, look at the #1 ranked dog, the Border Collie. They require a lot of time investment and attention. If not they tend to get anxious and bored. It's advised not to leave them alone for extended periods or they will tear things up. I'm not sure that argues for intelligence. In fact, it seems to argue against it. All of my pits have been house dogs and, once past the puppy stage, none of them have ever torn things up while left alone for extended periods.

The pit I have now will position herself in the loft, looking out the window and patiently wait for my wife and I to come home. When she sees the car pull in she'll stand up and start wagging her tail. When we get out of the car she'll give us a huge smile. In fact, she smiles at anyone that comes over. Some people are a bit intimidated by it until I explain what she's doing. Once they realize she IS smiling, they can't get over it. It's the funniest damn thing you'll ever see a dog do. I can also simply tell my dog that someone is coming over in a little while. She'll go back up to loft and watch for that person to arrive. If I don't tell her someone is coming over and I hear them arive, I simply have to say "Who's here?" to her. She goes right to the front door and begins looking. She also has the ability to count to at least two. She has two rubber balls at all times that she chews on. She'll leave them scattered around the house. I can pick one up and ask her where the other one is. She'll immediately begin searching for it. I never had to train her to do any of those things. She just began doing them. She does all the mundane sit, lay down, and speak stuff as well, which I did train her to do.

People can whine and cry all they want about how dangerous pits are and call to ban them. In some ways it's very similar to the gun issue. Well, to answer that...They can pry my pits from my cold, dead hands.

If people want to regulate the ownership of pits, I have no problems with that whatsoever. In fact, I'd completely prefer to kep pit bulls out of the hands of idiots, and the morons who use them as nothing more than penis extensions. Great dogs like pits don't deserve dumbass owners.
Can we get a picture of your pitbull smiling? :laugh:
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,849
48
91
Originally posted by: DomS
Dalmations are actually the most vicious breed of dog. They account for the greatest % of maulings. But you never hear this

Unless you can back this up, I hope this is some kind of attempt at sarcasm. I have no real position on pit bulls, other than as a parent, I'd never own one. Let's take a look at the available statistics. Even if these stats aren't perfect, the trend is clear. All you have to do is scroll down until you reach the row with the huge numbers - gee, it's pit bulls. The second-most attacks have come from rottweilers, and the number isn't even half of the pit bull attacks.

To go back to your statements, in this set of statistics dalmatians are responsible for 3 maimings and no deaths. Pit bulls account for 608 maimings and 104 deaths. Even more telling is the fact that these are raw numbers, so there is no correction for breed popularity. According to the American Kennel Club, labs are the most popular dog breed. So, if all dogs were equally dangerous, one would expect more attacks from labs than other breeds due to sheer numbers. Yet we have only 26 attacks from the top breed, compared to well over 1000 attacks from pit bulls, a breed that doesn't even make the top 50 in popularity. Taken together, those numbers are astounding.

Whether or not you support breed bans is one thing, but if these numbers are accurate, anyone trying to claim that pit bulls are not inherently more dangerous than other breeds needs to have their head examined.

EDIT: Just in case you don't like the first set of stats, here's another study with very similar results - pit bulls on top, followed by rottweilers.
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,920
3,203
146
The ultimate problem with these anti pit bull studies is that many times dogs that don't even have pit bull in them are reported as pit bulls in attack cases.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: BudAshes
The ultimate problem with these anti pit bull studies is that many times dogs that don't even have pit bull in them are reported as pit bulls in attack cases.

Agreed. Even Sarah Palin calls herself a Pitt Bull with lipstick. Lady, you are a god damned human being. It's ridiculous.
 

murphy55d

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
11,542
5
81
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: moshquerade
That's a copout and you know it.

Not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor. FFS, there are medical journals online, but we don't want to take any of that information as logical or conclusive based on scientific studies BECAUSE WE CAN ACCESS IT ON THE INTERNET!
Scientific principles and medical procedures are generally antiseptic discussions. The measurement methods of dog intelligence and the rankings you refer to are highly controversial, first of all. Then there's the emotionally charged aspect of the discussion whenever pit bulls are brought up. So we aren't talking about medical journals here. While not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor the vast amount of it is certainly up for debate and pointing to a single finding that ranks intelligence by breed certainly does not settle that debate.

As an example, look at the #1 ranked dog, the Border Collie. They require a lot of time investment and attention. If not they tend to get anxious and bored. It's advised not to leave them alone for extended periods or they will tear things up. I'm not sure that argues for intelligence. In fact, it seems to argue against it. All of my pits have been house dogs and, once past the puppy stage, none of them have ever torn things up while left alone for extended periods.

The pit I have now will position herself in the loft, looking out the window and patiently wait for my wife and I to come home. When she sees the car pull in she'll stand up and start wagging her tail. When we get out of the car she'll give us a huge smile. In fact, she smiles at anyone that comes over. Some people are a bit intimidated by it until I explain what she's doing. Once they realize she IS smiling, they can't get over it. It's the funniest damn thing you'll ever see a dog do. I can also simply tell my dog that someone is coming over in a little while. She'll go back up to loft and watch for that person to arrive. If I don't tell her someone is coming over and I hear them arive, I simply have to say "Who's here?" to her. She goes right to the front door and begins looking. She also has the ability to count to at least two. She has two rubber balls at all times that she chews on. She'll leave them scattered around the house. I can pick one up and ask her where the other one is. She'll immediately begin searching for it. I never had to train her to do any of those things. She just began doing them. She does all the mundane sit, lay down, and speak stuff as well, which I did train her to do.

People can whine and cry all they want about how dangerous pits are and call to ban them. In some ways it's very similar to the gun issue. Well, to answer that...They can pry my pits from my cold, dead hands.

If people want to regulate the ownership of pits, I have no problems with that whatsoever. In fact, I'd completely prefer to kep pit bulls out of the hands of idiots, and the morons who use them as nothing more than penis extensions. Great dogs like pits don't deserve dumbass owners.

sounds like our pit. she is a american staffordshire terrier variant... sweetest, smartest dog ive ever been around. she does the "whos there" thing, she'll run up to the front door or window and check things out. when my wife comes home, she knows the sound of our truck, and excitedly waits for her at the front door. she plays nice with both our cats, they come and curl up next to her and take naps together. anyone who comes over, she sits nice waiting to be pet. shes good around other dogs, too. if we take her to my inlaws, she runs around with their shephard mix, plays in the yard with him. even at the vet, when other people have their dogs sitting there, shes always the best behaved, despite their little yapping dogs trying to get at her.

awesome, awesome dog. she was a rescue too. i wouldnt trade her for any other dog in the world.

its a shame that their reputation precedes them.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: moshquerade
That's a copout and you know it.

Not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor. FFS, there are medical journals online, but we don't want to take any of that information as logical or conclusive based on scientific studies BECAUSE WE CAN ACCESS IT ON THE INTERNET!
Scientific principles and medical procedures are generally antiseptic discussions. The measurement methods of dog intelligence and the rankings you refer to are highly controversial, first of all. Then there's the emotionally charged aspect of the discussion whenever pit bulls are brought up. So we aren't talking about medical journals here. While not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor the vast amount of it is certainly up for debate and pointing to a single finding that ranks intelligence by breed certainly does not settle that debate.

As an example, look at the #1 ranked dog, the Border Collie. They require a lot of time investment and attention. If not they tend to get anxious and bored. It's advised not to leave them alone for extended periods or they will tear things up. I'm not sure that argues for intelligence. In fact, it seems to argue against it. All of my pits have been house dogs and, once past the puppy stage, none of them have ever torn things up while left alone for extended periods.

The pit I have now will position herself in the loft, looking out the window and patiently wait for my wife and I to come home. When she sees the car pull in she'll stand up and start wagging her tail. When we get out of the car she'll give us a huge smile. In fact, she smiles at anyone that comes over. Some people are a bit intimidated by it until I explain what she's doing. Once they realize she IS smiling, they can't get over it. It's the funniest damn thing you'll ever see a dog do. I can also simply tell my dog that someone is coming over in a little while. She'll go back up to loft and watch for that person to arrive. If I don't tell her someone is coming over and I hear them arive, I simply have to say "Who's here?" to her. She goes right to the front door and begins looking. She also has the ability to count to at least two. She has two rubber balls at all times that she chews on. She'll leave them scattered around the house. I can pick one up and ask her where the other one is. She'll immediately begin searching for it. I never had to train her to do any of those things. She just began doing them. She does all the mundane sit, lay down, and speak stuff as well, which I did train her to do.

People can whine and cry all they want about how dangerous pits are and call to ban them. In some ways it's very similar to the gun issue. Well, to answer that...They can pry my pits from my cold, dead hands.

If people want to regulate the ownership of pits, I have no problems with that whatsoever. In fact, I'd completely prefer to kep pit bulls out of the hands of idiots, and the morons who use them as nothing more than penis extensions. Great dogs like pits don't deserve dumbass owners.
Can we get a picture of your pitbull smiling? :laugh:

OK......ready to PLAY BALL!!
 

Oceandevi

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2006
3,085
1
0
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Pitbulls are horribly untrainably stupid in my experience.

A food aggressive or territorial aggressive pitbull is more dangerous than say... a toy poodle for obvious reasons.

3 Breeds make up 75% of dog related fatal attacks...

Pitbulls - gangsta
Rotts - gangsta
Dobermans - gangsta

fixed

 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,278
9,361
146
Originally posted by: torpid
Agreed. Even Sarah Palin calls herself a Pitt Bull with lipstick. Lady, you are a god damned human being. It's ridiculous.

Though you have to admit, there's something of a facial resemblance.
 

zanejohnson

Diamond Member
Nov 29, 2002
7,054
17
81
most pit bulls i've known were pretty unpredictable.... they just have that "fight" in them....

on the other hand, the only dog i've ever seen actually attack a small child was a chihauhau rofl...
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: zanejohnson
on the other hand, the only dog i've ever seen actually attack a small child was a chihauhau rofl...
Would a Chihuahua put an 80-year-old woman into the ICU, or vice versa?

I say ban them. A majority of the voting public agrees. It's only time now until someone introduces a ballot measure and people vote to pass it.
 

MarkW

Senior member
Sep 12, 2001
355
0
0
Yeah, I agree to ban pit bulls. Even though there may be studies that other dogs are equal, or more aggressive, the massive size of the jaws of the pit bull and muscle mass, can inflict a lot more damage than any other dog. With other dogs you may be walking off with a scratch, or bruise. With pit bulls you are more likely to be losing a limb, or death.

And to the people with families, especially kids. Even though you say that your pit bulls are so sweet and would never hurt anyone... Why chance it? If a pit bull attacks your kid, then he or she will be scarred for life.
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: TridenTBoy3555
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Le spent more than 10 hours in surgery Monday at the trauma center at Harborview Medical Center, where surgeons worked painstakingly to preserve her hearing and reattach her ears, both of which had been ripped from her head, Makus said. Her jaw was broken and her right arm and wrist were crushed beyond complete repair, he said.

Her scalp is covered with staples and her legs have deep, raw wounds that cannot be completely closed because physicians fear trapping infection inside, Makus said.

"This was not a dog bite, it was attempted dismemberment," Makus said Tuesday. "There is no way to describe the savagery and carnage."
It won't be very long until pit bulls will be banned from cities just like other exotic, dangerous animals.

I say good-riddens, and if one even attempted to lunge at me or my loved ones, their owner would be picking bits of doggie brain matter off their lawn.

Ignorant

Originally posted by: zerocool84
http://www.realpitbull.com/myths.html

I love my pitbull. It is a really nice dog and had never attacked anyone not putting it in danger. They are just very territorial dogs and protective of their owners. They are strong dogs. My dog barks fairly loudly and aggressive when the neighbors cut their backyard lawn.

What dog doesn't though?

Even with your spin that sounds like an animal that shouldn't be allowed inside city limits.
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Those sound like fight dogs. Here comes the ignorant pitbull hate-train.

Yep. He owned four Pitbulls. Those don't sound like family dogs.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
If you ban pits you might as well ban rots, dobys, and shepards as well. Those that sought out a pitt for all the wrong reasons will migrate to another breed. We had a Shepard before our pitt and it was very human aggressive, we had to watch her constantly when someone was over.
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Originally posted by: BUTCH1
If you ban pits you might as well ban rots, dobys, and shepards as well. Those that sought out a pitt for all the wrong reasons will migrate to another breed. We had a Shepard before our pitt and it was very human aggressive, we had to watch her constantly when someone was over.

And that is what people don't get. Its not the dog. Its the owners. You take any breed and train the dog for fighting and being agressive and the same thing will happen. And trust me you don't want these same nut jobs to start taking and doing the same thing with large german shephards and god forbid akitas and you will really start seeing some bloodshed. Its the owners not the dogs.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,716
417
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: BUTCH1
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: moshquerade
That's a copout and you know it.

Not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor. FFS, there are medical journals online, but we don't want to take any of that information as logical or conclusive based on scientific studies BECAUSE WE CAN ACCESS IT ON THE INTERNET!
Scientific principles and medical procedures are generally antiseptic discussions. The measurement methods of dog intelligence and the rankings you refer to are highly controversial, first of all. Then there's the emotionally charged aspect of the discussion whenever pit bulls are brought up. So we aren't talking about medical journals here. While not everything on the internet is innuendo and rumor the vast amount of it is certainly up for debate and pointing to a single finding that ranks intelligence by breed certainly does not settle that debate.

As an example, look at the #1 ranked dog, the Border Collie. They require a lot of time investment and attention. If not they tend to get anxious and bored. It's advised not to leave them alone for extended periods or they will tear things up. I'm not sure that argues for intelligence. In fact, it seems to argue against it. All of my pits have been house dogs and, once past the puppy stage, none of them have ever torn things up while left alone for extended periods.

The pit I have now will position herself in the loft, looking out the window and patiently wait for my wife and I to come home. When she sees the car pull in she'll stand up and start wagging her tail. When we get out of the car she'll give us a huge smile. In fact, she smiles at anyone that comes over. Some people are a bit intimidated by it until I explain what she's doing. Once they realize she IS smiling, they can't get over it. It's the funniest damn thing you'll ever see a dog do. I can also simply tell my dog that someone is coming over in a little while. She'll go back up to loft and watch for that person to arrive. If I don't tell her someone is coming over and I hear them arive, I simply have to say "Who's here?" to her. She goes right to the front door and begins looking. She also has the ability to count to at least two. She has two rubber balls at all times that she chews on. She'll leave them scattered around the house. I can pick one up and ask her where the other one is. She'll immediately begin searching for it. I never had to train her to do any of those things. She just began doing them. She does all the mundane sit, lay down, and speak stuff as well, which I did train her to do.

People can whine and cry all they want about how dangerous pits are and call to ban them. In some ways it's very similar to the gun issue. Well, to answer that...They can pry my pits from my cold, dead hands.

If people want to regulate the ownership of pits, I have no problems with that whatsoever. In fact, I'd completely prefer to kep pit bulls out of the hands of idiots, and the morons who use them as nothing more than penis extensions. Great dogs like pits don't deserve dumbass owners.
Can we get a picture of your pitbull smiling? :laugh:

OK......ready to PLAY BALL!!

HELLO! WTF R U DOOIN

Sleepin
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |