And another ad hominem.I've also noticed that, the second you can no longer hold up your end of any argument, no matter the instance, you come back screaming "ad hominem", over, and over, and over again.
It's a little more complex than that. 1080 is on the low side for vertical resolution, which is generally more important for perceived clarity. 1440 would have been sufficient for HDTV but 1080 is low enough that people with good eyesight will see an improvement from overkill like 4K.Anecdotal evidence vs science...believe what you want, it doesn't make it true. And as William Gaatjes said, it matters greatly what panel is used and what source. Crapy 1080p vs 4k of course there is a difference because the later uses better electronics all over and probably also better software (firmware, panel control).
And I doubt you actually took the same source to compare side-by-side with same lightning conditions and so forth. Go ahead and rationalize why you need a 4K TV, but that doesn't chance science or the biology of the human eye and brain.
And I doubt you actually took the same source to compare side-by-side with same lightning conditions and so forth. Go ahead and rationalize why you need a 4K TV, but that doesn't chance science or the biology of the human eye and brain.
And another ad hominem.
You continue to prove me correct. Thank you.I've also noticed that, the second you can no longer hold up your end of any argument, no matter the instance, you come back screaming "ad hominem", over, and over, and over again. I quite sure than anyone reading your responses who has more than a few brain cells of the threads in which you post has also noticed this. It's readily apparent to anyone with a brain that "ad hominem" in your brain equates to nothing less than "mea culpa".
Ad hominem is a fallacy. A fallacy is incorrect. Posting three or four in a row is also spam.You continue to prove me correct. Thank you.
I'm mostly hoping for UHD disk support and 60fps @ 1080 for existing and future titles (especially Bloodborne).
Deliver that, and they've sold me a PS4k.
(I do not currently own a PS4)
Ad hominem is a fallacy. A fallacy is incorrect. Posting three or four in a row is also spam.
I was wondering about input lag, it makes sense to me that a interlaced video stream will always have more input lag because of the de-interlacing that the tv must perform. The image is always build up from the current and previous still frame field.
But then again, it is no different then processing two different progressive pictures. So interlacing should not cause any more input lag then progressive pictures.
According to The Wall Street Journal (via GameSpot), “people familiar with the matter” say the new system will make a debut “before the planned October release of PlayStation VR” headset.
This latest report corroborates previous reports from Kotaku, which first brought this new and improved PlayStation 4.5 to light, reporting that it would come with an upgraded graphics card, which would allow for smoother performance, better graphics, and 4K resolution on games, and from Eurogamer, which “independently established that it’s real,” and is codenamed PlayStation 4K, further adding that it will almost certainly use “semi-custom versions of AMD’s CPU and GPU technology integrated into a single, console-friendly processor,” just like the current console.
The latest report from WSJ claims that the new PlayStation 4 console will be capable of delivering “ultra-high definition resolution graphics,” and that “Sony’s goal with the upgraded PlayStation 4 console is to capture gamers willing to pay for a richer gaming environment, including a high-end virtual reality experience.” This apparently points towards Sony’s two-tier approach, which will likely see the current PlayStation 4 sold at a lower price than the upgraded version. Sony will also reportedly not let the new system create a division, and will offer exact same game library on both consoles.
this might be a good move, high end PS4 and "mainstream" PS4 running the same games at a different res, specially if the cheaper model gets a price drop, it will be quite attractive
It's a very good idea:Option 5 - they can't do 4k within the box, so they go eGPU chassis, offer it separately as something people can buy if they want, and bring better 1080p graphics from a bump in GPU within the console.
Option 5 - they can't do 4k within the box, so they go eGPU chassis, offer it separately as something people can buy if they want, and bring better 1080p graphics from a bump in GPU within the console.
Ad hominem is a fallacy. A fallacy is incorrect. Posting three or four in a row is also spam.