- Mar 26, 2005
- 4,094
- 123
- 106
I have an old Nikon 3100 SLR and I'm not too happy with it's performance. Using it on auto, the results are very much hit or miss, with a lot more misses.
I really hate changing lenses to shoot far and close and I find the whole thing too bulky. It is missing good 1080p support, and doesn't have 4k at all.
I find myself using my iPhone 6s a lot more often for all my picture and video needs, but I wouldl ike to sell the Nikon and buy a smaller camera that would be significantly better than the iPhone for pictures and video.
This camera would have to produce more or less consistently good results without requiring too much knowledge from the user.
Is that even realistic for $200 or less? If so, can someone recommend something? I am particularly concerned with low light and indoor performance, and less concerned with day/outside performance.
I really hate changing lenses to shoot far and close and I find the whole thing too bulky. It is missing good 1080p support, and doesn't have 4k at all.
I find myself using my iPhone 6s a lot more often for all my picture and video needs, but I wouldl ike to sell the Nikon and buy a smaller camera that would be significantly better than the iPhone for pictures and video.
This camera would have to produce more or less consistently good results without requiring too much knowledge from the user.
Is that even realistic for $200 or less? If so, can someone recommend something? I am particularly concerned with low light and indoor performance, and less concerned with day/outside performance.