I assume that the ruling only applies to non-religious schools.Originally posted by: TheWart
Well I for one will continue to receite it. Put me in jail, I don't care. For I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it Stands, One Nation, Under God, Indivisible and with Liberty for All.
Originally posted by: Scipionix
It was actually the de facto motto from as early as 1864 and no later than 1908. While "In God we trust" is the official national motto, "E pluribus unum" is likewise considered a national motto.Originally posted by: Lucky
But really, if our national motto is "In God We Trust,"
Here's hoping that will change too. Although that phrase was first instituted back in the 1800's, there wasnt a law making it mandatory to appear on coins until 1955 (although congress ordered it in the 20's, I think), and it wasnt a national motto until 1956. The previous (and still somewhat concurrent) motto was 'E Pluribus Unum' but in 1963 the government said the motto was "in god we trust".
I actually did a research project on this for my college freshman english class.
The Great Seal and National Mottos of the United States
It has been unconstitutional since 1943 to make anyone recite the pledge in school (or even be in the same room when other people are reciting it). Thats' why this ruling is so bizarre.Originally posted by: Skoorb
They're right of course. Say it all you like if it pleases you but it does conflict with separation of church and state. That's obvious.
Well this time they're saying the pledge itself is unconstitutional right?Originally posted by: Vespasian
It has been unconstitutional since 1943 to make someone say the pledge in school (or even be in the same room when other people are saying it). Thats' why this ruling is so bizarre.Originally posted by: Skoorb
They're right of course. Say it all you like if it pleases you but it does conflict with separation of church and state. That's obvious.
No, just those two words.Originally posted by: Skoorb
Well this time they're saying the pledge itself is unconstitutional right?Originally posted by: Vespasian
It has been unconstitutional since 1943 to make someone recite the pledge in school (or even be in the same room when other people are reciting it). Thats' why this ruling is so bizarre.Originally posted by: Skoorb
They're right of course. Say it all you like if it pleases you but it does conflict with separation of church and state. That's obvious.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
They're right of course. Say it all you like if it pleases you but it does conflict with separation of church and state. That's obvious.
Originally posted by: TheWart
Well I for one will continue to receite it. Put me in jail, I don't care. For I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it Stands, One Nation under God, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for All.
Well there you're wrong. It's "One nation under God, not "One nation, under God."Originally posted by: TheWart
Well I for one will continue to receite it. Put me in jail, I don't care. For I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it Stands, One Nation, Under God, Indivisible and with Liberty for All.
Exactly so why was it there in the first place?Originally posted by: Scipionix
Originally posted by: Skoorb
They're right of course. Say it all you like if it pleases you but it does conflict with separation of church and state. That's obvious.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
Don't see how you figure that.
Apparently those words were added in the 1950's, (something that I did not know).Originally posted by: Skoorb
Exactly so why was it there in the first place?Originally posted by: Scipionix
Originally posted by: Skoorb
They're right of course. Say it all you like if it pleases you but it does conflict with separation of church and state. That's obvious.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
Don't see how you figure that.
Originally posted by: Piano Man
I'm personally for this, so I hope it stands. I highly doubt; however, that the Supreme Court with its current members will let this ruling stand.
Some father from California. He was just interviewed on FOX News.Originally posted by: Gujski
People have too much time on their hands. who decided this needed to go into court in the first place??
Originally posted by: Piano Man
I'm personally for this, so I hope it stands. I highly doubt; however, that the Supreme Court with its current members will let this ruling stand.
Originally posted by: Scipionix
Well there you're wrong. It's "One nation under God, not "One nation, under God."Originally posted by: TheWart
Well I for one will continue to receite it. Put me in jail, I don't care. For I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it Stands, One Nation, Under God, Indivisible and with Liberty for All.
Ever since, when reciting the Pledge, I have remained silent for those two words.
Yep. But it's nothing most AT folks don't know, already. I'm not only as old as dirt, you'll find my name on the patent.Originally posted by: Lucky
Ya know harvey, that really dates you.