Originally posted by: getbush
I agree. Anyone who thinks any one officer out there wakes up in the morning wishing to slaughter the innocent is an ignoramus. They don't wish to be put in a situation to shoot anyone. Doing so is a heavy thing that one lives with for the rest of their life.
Agreed, the vast majority of cops out there are hard-working, honest men and women who dedicate the greatest part of their lives protecting society at large. The problem that sometimes crops up, however, is when large urban forces like NYPD or LAPD form an 'us vs. them' mentality. In this way, they will purposefully defend murdering cops, even when the evidence overwhelmingly shows them to have behaved like animals. The Diallo case was a disgusting example of this. If four random guys, doesn't matter WHAT race, gunned an off-duty cop down (with the bogus excuse of 'we thought he was pulling a gun') and was shown to have shot that person to death, those four men would be executed for their crimes, and rightfully so. What happened to the four cops who coldly murdered Diallo? Paid leave, slap on the wrist mentality, and no convictions.
This kind of uneven justice betrays the standards that the police are supposed to be upholding. It's systemic, and it's disgusting. Whenever a cop is shown to have obviously committed a grave, even fatal act of violence, the wall of support, paid leave, counseling, etc, is overwhelming. Yet, citing a recent case here in North Texas, a man who served 25 years on death row for a crime that he did not commit (proven by DNA testing of forensic evidence from the scene) the prosecutor & DA first tried to suppress the evidence, and never even apologized for ruining this man's life after exonerating and releasing him. The law enforcement and criminal justice system in our country has been deeply poisoned by an 'us-vs-them' mentality, and it's exacerbated by the fact that many of the types of people who WANT to be cops, tend to be the exact wrong type of person for the job. Their primary motivation does not seem to be 'I want to help my city, my country, my family', it seems to be 'I want to carry a badge and a gun, get total health care and retirement, and be above the law'. This is overgeneralization, admittedly, because it's much easier to point at bad apples in our modern media culture. For every bad cop, there are probably 99 good ones. The frustrating flashpoint occurs when the 99 good ones stand up for the bad guy.
The military should be an example of internal justice done right. When a soldier has been found to have been guilty of wrongdoing, the punishment is swift, severe, and complete. There is no 'us-vs-them' bs, it's just 'this guy dishonored the uniform he wore, and this is what he gets'. These standards applied to our police would go a LONG way to reaffirming confidence in the morality and trustworthiness attributed to them. As it stands, I bet that if you took a poll regarding faith in the honesty and ethics of our police, it would show a faltering respect. This is a shame, because most of them are wonderful people. I have an Uncle that is a Captain in North Carolina, and one of my good friends here in the area is a 20-year highway patrol veteran. I would easily trust my life, and my family's, with either of them.