Originally posted by: BFG10K
Catalyst. I've never had any reason to use Omega.
what was it you didn't like about them? Performance, quality, benchmarks?Originally posted by: Rogodin2
Catalyst
I've used omega's and didn't like them
rogo
Originally posted by: azntiger0586
Originally posted by: BFG10K
Catalyst. I've never had any reason to use Omega.
The way I see it, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
That just might make me use the Omegas.tweaked settings that I am to lazy to learn myself
Originally posted by: dguy6789
I have used both, and to honestly say, there is no noticable difference. I would go with catalyst because I trust ATI more then some guy. ATI probably also tests more for glitches also.
Originally posted by: Maddscientist
Omegas......People who say their is no diffrence are toking on the peace pipe. Play some cs 2xaa 4xaf with cats then load omegas.....The diffrence is rather drastic. No tears on the screen no mipmap lines drawing in the floor ext ext. Omegas rock for image quality if you simply looking for speed use Cats if your looking for pretty use omegas.