Ozoned
Diamond Member
- Mar 22, 2004
- 5,578
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
So, if detainees are treated according to the principles in those documents, it's likely constitutional. But that's not what's being advocated, is it?
I posed a question to Bow earlier, before he ran away. I think you called it "Nicely obfuscational"
You just opened the door for the same question, Jhhnn. Claiming that you know what is being advocated.
As a matter of simple logic, for you to come to that conclusion and be able to defend your thought process, you would need to know what the current procedure is for the people that are detained without constitutional protection. The rules, the regulations, the whole nuts and bolts of the process that they go through currently.
Its time to ante up, Jhhnn.