Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
"when you can claim enough to know that other people are wrong and being conned? "
Sure. I never claim such. I only claim to have an opinion of such. An opinion only requires a reasonable conclusion from reasonable evidence. I have repeated this many times, but you don't seem to get it.
Theoretically, you could have somehow assumed that somehow I had intimate knowledge of the writers from 2000 years ago and I had scoured the world for enough evidence to actually present a case to the world of my knowledge. That would be ridiculously foolish to assume. This is a poll and thread on opinions. I stated my opinion. When it was made clear that somehow, despite whatever foolishness, somehow you thought I was stating a concluded fact, I have pointed out MULTIPLE TIMES in MULTIPLE POSTS that this is my opinion and that you need to learn to accept the opinions of others. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
The irony is strong that you keep hammering in personal attacks when you have made multiple attacks on me and I never on you. Let's go through them "bigot," "asshole," "stfu(multiple times)." And I called you arrogant? Yep, thanks for lecturing me on personal attacks!
I'm gonna say it one last time. You are entitled to your opinion. You are NOT entitled to be secure in your opinion. There is a difference. Get. a. clue.
And those attacks I supposedly made against you were my opinions, and I think they're quite factual even. So by your own logic, you can't say anything bad about me for having them, or even complain. Or are you saying that I'm not entitled to MY opinions?
All attacks are opinions.. they are still attacks.
You are entitled to have a poor opinion of someone, but attacking them with it is often frowned upon and marks someone as immature. Being that this is private property, ATOT reps would have every right to remove you for it.
I also have the right to call you out on the fact that you have personally name called and attacked me at least double the amount that you could possible claim an attack on you, all the while claiming that you have the high road.
I have the right to be "secure" in my opinion. When I hear something that proves otherwise, I will hear it. I have yet to hear it. Til then, I will keep this opinion. That is how it works usually.
What other way would you like it?
Now, since you have managed to divert attention from your claim. Let's try this again.
""when you can claim enough to know that other people are wrong and being conned? " "
I only claimed to have an opinion that the bible is the largest con in history. An opinion can be an alternate viewpoint. It is in NO way a claim to have the "right" answer. That is what is called a FACT. I claimed no such fact. I continue to say it is my opinion. That in itself shows that I do not believe it to be a fact.
Now, if you claimed, "no it is not!" and I responded, "you are wrong.", then THAT could be construed as me saying that others are wrong. If I have done so, please quote me and I will amend my opinion.
So I challenge you again, PROVE IT. Quote me where I said any other view is wrong.