Originally posted by: Bumrush99
Originally posted by: jalaram
Originally posted by: notfred
The same people that smoke it now would continue to smoke it. People that don't smoke it now would probably not smoke it. People don't choose to smoke weed or not based on its legality anymore than they choose whether or not to drive 5mph over the limit based on its legality.
:thumbsup:
BTW, I don't smoke anything.
Using your logic, ALL drugs should be legalized, heck the number of drug users would pretty much remain constant, right?
Imagine if alcohol was illegal and it was a felony offense to be caught with it. Don't you think a large percentage of the people that currently drink alcohol would stop? And if it was legalized a lot more people would drink socially?
Drugs SHOULD be legal. Whether people should USE drugs or not is a moral question, not properly a legal one.
You SHOULD be free to destroy yourself with drugs if you want to, as a matter of principle. You own your life, and that necessarily includes the right of use and disposal.
Also as a matter of principle you SHOULDN'T use drugs because they are self destructive and provide little or no legitimate benefit. They are costly and dangerous, and a moral person doesn't intentionally destroy his or her own life.
Morality, however, *REQUIRES* a conscious choice in the face of an alternative. If I CHOOSE not to do drugs when I COULD do them, that's moral. If I don't do them because you disallow it and make it hard to get them, that's *not* moral. It's in fact IMMORAL on your part and AMORAL on mine.
Jason