Poll: Muhammad Ali vs Mike Tyson, both in their prime.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

hatuko

Member
Sep 28, 2014
42
0
36
Ali. Speed, footwork, reach, chin, dodging / head movement / defence, tactics, he had it all. I think Tyson would struggle to come close and do his stuff.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
3
81
He was 29 and didn't have 4 years of getting beat up. Not necessarily out of his prime considering that.

He fought much differently after his return to boxing. Before he was able to constantly evade and maintain an offensive while doing so for an entire match. After, he never had the stamina to maintain that an entire match and had to manage his energy.

You guys complain about people bringing up Tyson out of his prime... and then use Ali's non-prime years as examples...
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
He fought much differently after his return to boxing. Before he was able to constantly evade and maintain an offensive while doing so for an entire match. After, he never had the stamina to maintain that an entire match and had to manage his energy.

You guys complain about people bringing up Tyson out of his prime... and then use Ali's non-prime years as examples...

With the exception of the Sonny Liston upset, what big name fighter did Ali face before exile? And, quite a few people are talking about things like the rope-a-dope, something Ali didn't use until the the Joe Fraizer fight, which rocked Ali, who wasn't used to taking that kind of punishment. With that knowledge, if Ali could successfully avoid Tyson the entire fight, he would not be moved from form. However, if Tyson got in some hits, Ali wasn't, in this prime, equipped to really handle that. He eventually developed that kind of toughness, but his early days it just didn't exist.

Tyson peaked and hit troubled water before he could have a long and great career like Ali. Ali had some trouble, but recovered and was mentally tough enough to overcome the distractions around him. Tyson, on the other hand, let his life completely fall apart and if it wasn't for raw athletic talent, would have been finished sooner than he was.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
We also have to consider the competition Ali and Tyson faced. Ali faced some of the all time greats. By the time Tyson was destroying people, the level of boxing had already degraded considerably. In fact, the level of boxing got so bad that a 45 year old Foreman won the title in '94. If a 45 year old foreman could be the world champion just 5 years after Tyson's supposed prime, what does that say about the level of competition at the time?

I'd take Ali over Tyson.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
3
81
With the exception of the Sonny Liston upset, what big name fighter did Ali face before exile? And, quite a few people are talking about things like the rope-a-dope, something Ali didn't use until the the Joe Fraizer fight, which rocked Ali, who wasn't used to taking that kind of punishment. With that knowledge, if Ali could successfully avoid Tyson the entire fight, he would not be moved from form. However, if Tyson got in some hits, Ali wasn't, in this prime, equipped to really handle that. He eventually developed that kind of toughness, but his early days it just didn't exist.

Tyson peaked and hit troubled water before he could have a long and great career like Ali. Ali had some trouble, but recovered and was mentally tough enough to overcome the distractions around him. Tyson, on the other hand, let his life completely fall apart and if it wasn't for raw athletic talent, would have been finished sooner than he was.

I don't see any evidence of Ali lacking toughness in his prime, except that he was so fast and reflexes so honed that he didn't need it. Although in his prime he could avoid Tyson the entire fight, he wouldn't need to. He would hold even with him the first few rounds at worst and then as Tyson tired he would pick him completely apart.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I don't see any evidence of Ali lacking toughness in his prime, except that he was so fast and reflexes so honed that he didn't need it. Although in his prime he could avoid Tyson the entire fight, he wouldn't need to. He would hold even with him the first few rounds at worst and then as Tyson tired he would pick him completely apart.

The Frazier fight proved Ali, even if out of boxing, wasn't prepared to really be hit. Fraizer stunned him with his blows, something Ali wasn't used to. And, it wasn't as bad as it should have been because Fraizer was worried about Ali playing opossum, something Tyson wouldn't fear, and would continue a relentless assault.

Tyson, using the peek-a-boo style he did early on, quick jabs, and body shots (something he abandoned for the most part shortly before the Douglas fight) is there Tyson really shined. He had genuine boxing ability beyond thundering knockout power, that the later started to rely heavily on. He was an amazing boxer, not some thug trying to brawl with big punches. Ali would have trouble out boxing him, especially if Tyson could get a decent hit or two in.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
3
81
The Frazier fight proved Ali, even if out of boxing, wasn't prepared to really be hit. Fraizer stunned him with his blows, something Ali wasn't used to. And, it wasn't as bad as it should have been because Fraizer was worried about Ali playing opossum, something Tyson wouldn't fear, and would continue a relentless assault.

Tyson, using the peek-a-boo style he did early on, quick jabs, and body shots (something he abandoned for the most part shortly before the Douglas fight) is there Tyson really shined. He had genuine boxing ability beyond thundering knockout power, that the later started to rely heavily on. He was an amazing boxer, not some thug trying to brawl with big punches. Ali would have trouble out boxing him, especially if Tyson could get a decent hit or two in.

The Frazier fight went even in the early rounds where they traded blows. It's common knowledge that Ali lost a significant amount of his reflexes and stamina after his return to boxing.

The fight you site as showing Ali lacked toughness in his prime was 1 not in his prime and 2 went to decision.
 
Last edited:

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Tyson.

I just don't believe Ali could completely avoid his punches, nor take many.

I remember when Tyson was first getting started. One of those fights was Joe Frazier's son. Tyson hit him so hard with an uppercut the kid actually came off the floor towards the ceiling. he was out, completely. They brought in oxygen tanks etc. I never saw him get up. I do know he never fought again.

Fern
 

bradley

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
3,671
2
81
For the record, I like Tyson and feel he could have been among the greats. After Cus D'amato's death, Mike started to lose his incredible focus.

However.... in Mike Tyson’s first year, he *never* faced a fighter with a winning record. Of his first fifteen fights, five of those opponents hadn't won a single fight and three had won only a single fight.

When Mike did start facing better fighters, suddenly those early round knockouts were disappearing and matches were going much longer. In his second year, the likes of Tilis, Green, Smith, Ribalta as middle-of-the-roaders all took Mike beyond the 10th round. Thusly Mike didn't possess the stamina for such an arduous schedule and thereafter was limited to 3-4 matches per year.

And for those saying a young Mike Tyson would have destroyed Holyfield or Lewis, Mike’s own camp certainly didn’t think so. They *actively* avoided these matches for as long as feasibly possible.


Anyhow I believe Ali vs. Tyson would have gone down a lot like Ali vs. Foreman, with Ali winning in the 8th via KO. And George was an even heavier (yet slower) puncher than Tyson. Obviously there won’t be any early knockouts with two formidable foes (not journeymen) in the ring.

Foreman was the *heavy* favorite against Ali and many thought him to be unbeatable. During the bout, Ali was against the ropes many times as he allowed the six-years younger Foreman to tire by taking bodyshots. In the eighth, a 32yo, Ali struck lightning-quick like a cobra and finished off Foreman. .

In fact, I can't think of a single Tyson fight as great as Ali's five greatest. However the Rumble in the Jungle was unquestionably thee greatest fight.

George Foreman vs Muhammad Ali - Oct. 30, 1974 - Entire fight - Rounds 1 - 8 & Interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55AasOJZzDE
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,643
9
81
Tyson, using the peek-a-boo style he did early on, quick jabs, and body shots (something he abandoned for the most part shortly before the Douglas fight) is there Tyson really shined. He had genuine boxing ability beyond thundering knockout power, that the later started to rely heavily on. He was an amazing boxer, not some thug trying to brawl with big punches. Ali would have trouble out boxing him, especially if Tyson could get a decent hit or two in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woTLysKIQVM

I'd give Ali the edge in movement for sure, but Tyson was still really, really good at it.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,665
67
91
In their prime, Tyson. For the time they lived in their prime, no answer.

Another dumb question. A 300 hitter today would have been a 500 hitter in 1920. And a 300 hitter from 1920 would be a 100 hitter today. The competition is better today.

So guess what, Tyson had tougher competition than ALi to get to the top. Not to mention steroids.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
In their prime, Tyson. For the time they lived in their prime, no answer.

Another dumb question. A 300 hitter today would have been a 500 hitter in 1920. And a 300 hitter from 1920 would be a 100 hitter today. The competition is better today.

So guess what, Tyson had tougher competition than ALi to get to the top. Not to mention steroids.

Um, no. A 300 hitter in 1920 would likely be above a 300 today. The lowering of the mound gave a significant advantage to batters.

Also, Ali during his rise before exile, had about the same competition as Tyson. However, afterwards, he faced some of the best boxers of all time, hardly something Tyson can say he did.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,127
1,604
126
Tyson was like a machine. he could take and deliver tons of abuse, even if he did not do so in an artistic manner, he was a powerhouse.

Ali was less based on brute force and more on skill.

We all love when skill pays off and defeats brute force, but, the reality is that it really could be a toss up.
 

Lurknomore

Golden Member
Jul 3, 2005
1,310
0
0
A prime Tyson, under Rooney, staying true to Cus and Teddy's teaching, would handle Ali no doubt ( The best of Ali-1967- when he slaughtered Williams).
 

ringtail

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2012
1,030
34
91
Tyson would only need to really connect just once to certainly kill Cassius Clay.

Tyson was vastly more powerful, the better athlete.

Ali spewed his annoying, self-aggrandizing hype cliche, "I am the greatest," at a time when not Ali, but rather soccer's Pele was THEEE GREATEST, the most famous sports figure on earth. By far, no comparison. At that time half the people on earth never heard of Cassius Clay (Ali), everybody was enthralled by Pele.

In addition to significantly more power, and higher athleticism, Tyson also has a lot more "heart."
 

bradley

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
3,671
2
81
When Tyson KOs no-names and journeymen in early rounds, he’s the most fierce boxer in history; yet all of his losses are attributed to being older, out of shape, beyond his peak etc.

Ali fought way tougher and more experienced competition than Tyson, and it’s not even close...

Collective record of Tyson’s first 13 opponents
Won 106 (KO 65)/ Lost 179 (KO 118)/ Draws 8

Collective record of Ali’s first 13 opponents
Won 289 (KO 179)/ Lost 181 (KO 85)/ Draws 18

If we’re going to be realistic, I don’t believe Mike Tyson’s 71” reach would have overcome Ali’s 80” reach.

And for those think Mike Tyson would have killed Foreman, he had the chance to fight George for a huge purse and wanted no part of it. Another example of Mike avoiding fierce competitors throughout his career.

Here's Frank Lotierzo's (boxing historian, writer and fight analyst) opinion on why a Tyson v. Foreman matchup never happened.

Goodman stated that Tyson said Foreman was much better than people thought, and was a dangerous fight for any of the top heavyweights. Goodman proceeded to explain how Tyson was calling Foreman a big con man, and explained that the grandpop act was just a front. He said Tyson saw Foreman as trying to set up the boxing world into thinking he was a pushover, knowing that he really wasn't. Tyson said Foreman was a wolf in sheep's clothing. Goodman continued to say that after seeing Tyson's response to King trying to push him into a fight with Foreman, he had no doubt that Tyson had fear of Foreman. He also said that from that point on, he felt that if Foreman and Tyson ever fought, Foreman would knock Tyson out!

Throughout the lunch Goodman, Duva, Benton, and myself shared stories and thoughts on the fight game. Out of the blue Goodman said, "Oh I remember why else Tyson wanted no parts of Foreman. He said that King had found out from Steve Lott that Tyson and Cus D'Amato used to watch the Frazier-Foreman fight over and over." He continued saying that Tyson loved that fight because he was awed by Foreman's power and Frazier's toughness and how he kept getting up after every knockdown. He also said that Lott told King that Cus sat alongside Tyson saying, "It's suicide against Foreman if you're short and fight a swarming attacking style like Marciano or Frazier," never figuring that Foreman could be a possible Tyson opponent down the road. He said that Cus said the only fighters who had a chance against Foreman were, tall rangy fighters who could fight him from a distance while moving away from him, and no way any swarmer could beat Foreman by going to him.

Those are the words of the man who actually had a hand in trying to make the Foreman-Tyson fight, and was in the room when the negotiations broke down. Over the years, I've talked to many people who were involved with Tyson and Foreman and they all verify the story, every one of them. I have also talked to people who were involved with promoting Foreman, including Ron Weathers who promoted a few of Foreman's comeback fights. He told me the same story. The fight didn't happen because of Tyson being fearful of losing to George. Bob Arum also said that he dreamed of making Foreman-Tyson. He said it would be huge money and that Foreman would stop Tyson easier than he did Frazier. This is something Arum often repeated to the press. I have also heard this from George's brother Roy who was his business manager. I co-hosted a boxing show with Roy in Atlantic City for a little less than two months and this was a regular topic when discussing Tyson. Anyone who covered boxing at the time or knew any of the involved parties knew of this. It's not breaking news.

It is absolutely a fact that Mike Tyson was afraid to fight 41-year-old George Foreman--the same Foreman who Evander Holyfield would fight and beat in April of 1991. I have not a doubt that had Foreman and Tyson fought anytime between 1990 and 1997 that Foreman would have knocked Tyson out inside of three rounds. Tyson just has nothing to beat Foreman with; his edge in hand speed would have been a non-factor. He can't beat him by backing away, and he would have gotten his head handed to him if he brought the fight to Foreman. In addition, Foreman was bigger, stronger, tougher and hit harder. Not to mention the fact that Foreman had a better chin and no fear or doubt, unlike Tyson, who was full of fear and self-doubt.

Think about it, Foreman-Tyson was the biggest fight that could have been made in 1990. Foreman was perceived to be an easy fight for Tyson, and it would have been his biggest payday to date. There can only be one reason why Tyson didn't fight Foreman, and that's because he feared losing to him.

I haven't a morsel of a doubt that Tyson just doesn't match up with Foreman, and he knows it. If Tyson of 1990 was afraid of an old Foreman, think how petrified he would of been of a prime Foreman, the one who stared down both Joe Frazier and Muhammad Ali in 1973 and 1974.
 

bradley

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
3,671
2
81
Tyson would only need to really connect just once to certainly kill Cassius Clay.

Tyson was vastly more powerful, the better athlete.

Ali spewed his annoying, self-aggrandizing hype cliche, "I am the greatest," at a time when not Ali, but rather soccer's Pele was THEEE GREATEST, the most famous sports figure on earth. By far, no comparison. At that time half the people on earth never heard of Cassius Clay (Ali), everybody was enthralled by Pele.

In addition to significantly more power, and higher athleticism, Tyson also has a lot more "heart."

I have no doubt these are your perceptions about Ali being a braggart and Tyson having more heart, but reality differs from your folklore.

Ali was knocked out his first (and only) time at 38 years-old. And it's doubtful Tyson (with his short reach) could have broken this impressive streak. BTW, Tyson was knocked out five times.

Oh, Ali proved himself to have an extremely strong jaw. Ken Norton actually broke it, yet Ali continued fighting through the progressive pain for seven more rounds. I cannot find a single example where Mike Tyson displayed comparable heart.

Ali was known for getting better after getting knocked down, coming back to win several fights. Mike’s solitary heartful comeback from a knockdown was against Razor Ruddock.

You say Mike had more athletcism, but he admittedly had a lung condition (due to childhood asthma) that hurt him with stamina in later rounds. Ali was known to throw combinations in the later rounds, by then Tyson (with his notorious poor fitness/conditioning) was almost dead. Meaning Tyson would have been toast to Ali by the eighth.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,929
142
106
No, I'm contrasting them. I clearly said Tyson was faster than Foreman.

Nobody gives a shit about speed when Foreman was stronger, heavier, and could hit harder than Tyson.

Evander Holyfield: "[Foreman] He hit me harder than any fighter. Even though he didn't knock me down but with one shot - I thought he knocked all my teeth out."
http://youtu.be/lMwWynfQKLc

Young or even old Foreman's jab alone would have given Tyson fits, and old 42-year-old Foreman wasn't even KO'd by Holyfield yet a young 31-year-old Tyson was.

In fact, Tyson barely makes ESPN's top 50 boxers of all time list. Foreman? #20. Ali? #2.
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/greatest/featureVideo?page=greatest1120

Let's not forget that Don King, after the Buster KO, was too scared of Foreman beating Tyson so it never happened. Let's also not forget that Foreman knocked out 19-years-younger-Micheal Moorer, who had beaten Holyfield, to become the heavyweight champ at age 45 and is still the oldest.heavyweight.champ.ever. That is a record that will most likely not be broken in our lifetime.

Considering the facts above:
1) Foreman hit harder than Mike
2) KO'd more boxers than Mike (68 to 44)
3) Foreman beat or held his own against much younger boxers that either KO'd or probably beaten Mike (Holyfield, Moorer)
4) Foreman considered by ESPN to be 30 spots better than Mike on the all-time greatest list.

Now that we've established that Foreman > Tyson, four words: Rumble in the Jungle. Ali's greatest victory. For those of you unfamiliar:
http://youtu.be/7Ec-KhDbanc

Conclusion: Ali over Mike decisively. It's practically even a joke that we're having this discussion when the facts are laid out like this. Ali beating Foreman puts him to greatest of all time status because Foreman's accomplishments are so astounding. Mike wouldn't have even beaten Foreman, let alone Ali. Ali and Foreman both took huge punches that would have KO'd Mike (and did). For Ali, see the Shavers fight. For Foreman, see the Holyfield fight where Foreman withstood the same direct blows that KO'd Mike.
 
Last edited:

vshah

Lifer
Sep 20, 2003
19,003
24
81
just because A beat B and B beat C, doesn't necessarily mean A would beat C. But in this case, I vote Ali.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
3
81
Tyson would only need to really connect just once to certainly kill Cassius Clay.

Tyson was vastly more powerful, the better athlete.

Ali spewed his annoying, self-aggrandizing hype cliche, "I am the greatest," at a time when not Ali, but rather soccer's Pele was THEEE GREATEST, the most famous sports figure on earth. By far, no comparison. At that time half the people on earth never heard of Cassius Clay (Ali), everybody was enthralled by Pele.

In addition to significantly more power, and higher athleticism, Tyson also has a lot more "heart."

Lol wut? How about talk about boxing instead of he said she said.

Saying Tyson had more heart pretty much means I can't take anything you said/say seriously (going into a diatribe on soccer isn't helping you either). When the two men were really tested, Ali showed he had a level of "heart" that was pretty much unmatched in the history of boxing and Tyson nearly consistently faltered both in the ring and his life.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |