LIFETIME JOB, big difference.Odd the change in tone when the Dems were about to elect someone president who actively ridiculed and tried to silence those who accused her husband of sexual assault. Definitely not political. Definitely.
But Hillary, the fallback they ALWAYS use.Aw yeah, here comes the Hilary hate, LOL
She lost. Get over it.Odd the change in tone when the Dems were about to elect someone president who actively ridiculed and tried to silence those who accused her husband of sexual assault. Definitely not political. Definitely.
LIFETIME JOB, big difference.
But Hillary, the fallback they ALWAYS use.
Your answers are always another question.How long they hold the position matters in this case? If SC justices only had four year terms then Ms Fords allegations would be less important?
How long they hold the position matters in this case? If SC justices only had four year terms then Ms Fords allegations would be less important?
Only not over his head, that was through his ears...nothing to stop it.Whoosh.....
Hilary has forced the GOP to behave in so many awful ways. If only she hadn’t said mean things about them during the campaign they would be nicer people today.
She even forced them through her Jedi mind control techniques to pass tax cuts that we have to borrow money to pay for and pick a drunken party boy as a scotus nominee.
Heck she is so powerful she even made poor Scott Pruitt want a used mattress.
You've already made it clear that you don't think there's anything to her claims.How long they hold the position matters in this case? If SC justices only had four year terms then Ms Fords allegations would be less important?
I think he's related to Buckshot, wasn't that his bit?You've already made it clear that you don't think there's anything to her claims.
How long they hold the position matters in this case? If SC justices only had four year terms then Ms Fords allegations would be less important?
Your answers are always another question.
I’m trying to understand your reasoning. You said:
LIFETIME JOB, big difference.Why would the duration of the appointment make a difference in this case, I don’t get it.
The Dems were about to elect a woman who ridiculed and tried to silence sexual assault accusers. It wasn’t important in 2016, now it is. Weird.
Yes. Isn’t this obvious? The costs of making a mistake are greater with a lifetime position.
The president is by far a more politically influential job. Trumps been in office two years and he’s done a helluva lot more to alter the direction of the country than a Supreme Court justice.
The president is by far a more politically influential job. Trumps been in office two years and he’s done a helluva lot more to alter the direction of the country than a Supreme Court justice.
Odd the change in tone when the Dems were about to elect someone president who actively ridiculed and tried to silence those who accused her husband of sexual assault. Definitely not political. Definitely.
The president is by far a more politically influential job. Trumps been in office two years and he’s done a helluva lot more to alter the direction of the country than a Supreme Court justice.
And oddly enough Ford wasn’t asked about her drinking.
For a second I thought you might actually be conceding the point. Instead we're back at square one, aren't we?
He has indeed been very influential by running roughshod over the presidency and crapping all over the rule of law/norms, but that's because the Republicans won't hold him accountable. He lost the popular vote and was put in place by what Hillary correctly identified as deplorables; the same exact people who wouldn't give a shit if Kavanaugh was a rapist. And of course, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and the lower courts would be his biggest things enabled by his party (i.e. can't be done unilaterally). On the other hand, Kavanaugh is obviously a GOP operative, but no one would be able to force him to recuse in any case. It's exactly opposite of what you're trying to argue. Do you even read the drivel you post?
Nah, my arguement is you only seem to selectively care about sexual assault allegations and were going to elect a woman for president who ridiculed those making the accusations, was involved with trying to research dirt on them to attack their reputations, and possibly even tried to intimidate them into silence.
It’s not about politics, right?