ecogen
Golden Member
- Dec 24, 2016
- 1,217
- 1,288
- 136
I disagree with Republicans on a ton of stuff, obviously disagree with Dems too. Registered as an independent. Sorry
Who was the last democrat you voted for?
I disagree with Republicans on a ton of stuff, obviously disagree with Dems too. Registered as an independent. Sorry
Yet you're only deeply concerned by the Democrats, and minorities, and women.
Who was the last democrat you voted for?
Obama
Twice actually
Twice actually
What I admitted is that your claim that both sides are political means nothing to the judgment of whether B K should be approved, that it is only a product of your dementia those things are related. There remains the real issue completely divorced from politics as to his real judicial worthiness. On that in the judgement of millions of people he has failed and will bring that taint to the court if he is seated on it further eroding the vital respect that is demanded for those who are charged with the IMPARTIAL dispensing of justice. As a bigot you always deflect from the real issue.Thank you for your opinion on my evil tortured beliefs. I’m glad you admit this charade is strictly political by those in power and the Supreme Court seat is the concern, not what happened between Ms Ford and Mr Kavanaugh 36 years ago.
Why did you make an inane argument about electing Hillary then? Between her & the orange buffoon, the choice was easy.
Im not the one pretending to care what happened between the two of them back in high school. You’re the one that claims to be concerned about sexual assault but we’re voting for a candidate that attacked the ones making the accusations.
Not really odd as a means by which to blind yourself to the real issue. You live in a rose colored prison fearing the pain that loss of your sacred moral beliefs would bring you. You see me as the hand of the devil on your ankle dragging you down to hell, not somebody who knows the depth of the scar tissue that covers your wounds having opened them in me myself. There is a way out but unfortunately the road goes through hell.Odd the change in tone when the Dems were about to elect someone president who actively ridiculed and tried to silence those who accused her husband of sexual assault. Definitely not political. Definitely.
You keep claiming everyone is like you and they don’t care about attempted rape.
Other people really, really do. You’re projecting.
You were trying to vote a person into the presidency that attacked and tried to silence alleged rape victims, I’m pretty sure you don’t actually care either.
His hatred of evil is so great that he can't see it in himself. He doesn't get what it means to not judge so one isn't judged. Projection to him is just a word he can't connect with introspectively.You keep claiming everyone is like you and they don’t care about attempted rape.
Other people really, really do. You’re projecting.
Here is where you lie to yourself again. I voted for Hillary Clinton fully aware of those facts because the alternate choice was far far far worse. You are a bigot and can't stick with the facts of any one issue before you without your mind deflecting away from the unpleasant reality that the evil you see in others is your own evil looking back at you. You need to think yourself pure, like our Judge Kavanaugh, and that need fucks up all your moral decisions. Normal people will make the best out of a bunch of bad choices that they can.You were trying to vote a person into the presidency that attacked and tried to silence alleged rape victims, I’m pretty sure you don’t actually care either.
You were trying to vote a person into the presidency that attacked and tried to silence alleged rape victims, I’m pretty sure you don’t actually care either.
Can you confirm that you consider people saying mean things about sexual assault victims is not nearly as bad as sexually assaulting victims?
You could just say "no" to save time, equivocator.I can confirm that hiring investigators to dig up dirt on those doing the accusations in an attempt to smear their reputation and possibly intimidating them into silence is somewhere in the same ballpark.
Try, ......I can confirm I remain a blind bigot via the following rationalization: To truth X I counter with rationalization Y where Y is a member of the set of positive integers.I can confirm that hiring investigators to dig up dirt on those doing the accusations in an attempt to smear their reputation and possibly intimidating them into silence is somewhere in the same ballpark.
You could just say "no" to save time, equivocator.
Mid terms aren't stopping them from nominating someone else. If the White House had requested an FBI follow up when story first broke we'd be finished by now, either way.Time constraints due to the midterms. It’s all politics, every bit of it. Same reason Dems want to drag this out for a few more weeks. It’s all about the midterms and who controls the seat.