Poll only - Who's lying?

[OutHouse]

And he just had to lie about it all, repeatedly. He also displayed raw raving partisanship that puts the lie to the notion that he could be above such bias as a justice on the SCOTUS. It would be corrosive to the moral integrity of the court.

you are just pissed that his bias isnt leaning your way.

 

[Jhhnn]

you are just pissed that his bias isnt leaning your way.

I'm sure anybody the Senate might confirm at this point would be conservative. Doesn't mean confirming a raging conspiracy theorist would be good for any of us. Doesn't mean we want a man whose lies & distortions were all too obvious last Thursday, either.

 

[IronWing]

Whatever it was that Kavanaugh did for the Bush administration that the Republicans are hiding is going to dangle over his role on the court. Kavanaugh is a completely compromised candidate.

 

[soulcougher73]

sure is. a lot more relevant than yearbooks and calender's from a 17 year old. or asking how to play devils triangle.

Devil’s Triangle isn’t a game lol so misinformed.

 

[IJTSSG]

You girls have been moving the goalposts pretty continuously for a few weeks now. Your stamina is kinda impressive.

Good job!

 

[Jhhnn]

You girls have been moving the goalposts pretty continuously for a few weeks now. Your stamina is kinda impressive.

Good job!

Tell it to these folks-

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/03/opinion/kavanaugh-law-professors-letter.html

 

[ivwshane]

No written commentary, and no link. You know better.

Perknose
Forum Director

No citation huh?

What's wrong? Are you too ashamed that you just posted a pic linked to 4chan?

Fucking piece of shit!

So Grassley and fox are running this story based off of a letter posted from 4chan?

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1538530617844.png

This won't end well for any of you.

Hey, remember that talking point that Ford lied under oath about coaching a friend in how to take a polygraph? The allegation that came from an "anonymous ex-boyfriend?" (I thought anonymous allegations were supposed to be worthless!) The incident that supposedly occurred decades ago? (I thought decades old incidents were irrelevant!) The incident that is a he/she said? (I thought that allegations of this sort needed to have insurmountable corroborating evidence in order to even consider the defendant potentially guilty!)

Yeah, the person actually involved in it says it's all bogus.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5bb4dd9be4b01470d04d963e

Apparently so-

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...d-coach-polygraph_us_5bb4dd9be4b01470d04d963e

Called it!

 

[zinfamous]

I wonder what I’d call a 36 year old uncorroborated accusation based on a memory.

I wonder what I'd call an unattributed copy-paste, without link and source, typed by god-knows whom, attributed to god-knows-whom?

Oh right, you are a fucking rube. It's plain as day. Why do you still believe otherwise?

 

[zinfamous]

Called it!

Oh shit I'm late, again.

 

[zinfamous]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ch...for-potential-polygraph-grassley-sounds-alarm

Fake News

Will you actually apologize for being easily duped and passing on obvious bullshit as if it were true?

Are you going to do this?

You copy-pasted something that was proven to be fake beyond all shadow of a doubt.

Are you going to apologize for that, or continue to obfuscate?

 

[zinfamous]

sure is. a lot more relevant than yearbooks and calender's from a 17 year old. or asking how to play devils triangle.

defend the rapist! at all costs! never back down! rape at 17 isn't really rape!

good little doggy. good boy!

 

[zinfamous]

you are just pissed that his bias isnt leaning your way.

Yeah, Gorsuch got this much shit, huh?

Every time you fucking numbnuts trot out this stupid point, it is dead before it lands.

and you know it. Why do you keep trying this dumb, obvious shit?

What is so hard about finding an actual conservative that isn't a raging, unhinged rapist, at this moment in time? Why is that so god damn fucking difficult? Can you actually respond to that at all?

 

[Maxima1]

Yeah, Gorsuch got this much shit, huh?

Every time you fucking numbnuts trot out this stupid point, it is dead before it lands.

and you know it. Why do you keep trying this dumb, obvious shit?

What is so hard about finding an actual conservative that isn't a raging, unhinged rapist, at this moment in time? Why is that so god damn fucking difficult? Can you actually respond to that at all?

Hell, while Gorsuch got more of it, Kavanaugh also had smarmy "progressives" come out supporting him as if we couldn't do better or that they would rule fairly enough.

But let's be honest; they're all incredibly biased and disingenuous with the "Originalist" crap. To be in the Federalist Society, you kind of have to be a little sociopathic. Hell, people are already assuming if Kavanaugh gets in, the other four conservatives will go along with protecting Trump. Wouldn't surprise me considering past rulings and the "moderate" Anthony Kennedy.

 

[HomerJS]

Devil’s Triangle isn’t a game lol so misinformed.

Kavanaugh's freshman roommate in an interview last night said he heard Lil' Brett use the phrase Devils Triable in reference to sex.

 

[mikeymikec]

It's funny how conservatives here keep being purposefully obtuse about the relevance of asking Kavanaugh what slang terms he used meant (when they know those terms are regarding sex and alcohol), to the guy who claimed to be a virgin at that time and ducked questions about his alcohol consumption.

I say purposefully obtuse because had Kavanaugh not been "one of their people", the minimal insight required would have revealed itself.

Of course I'm assuming they're being purposefully obtuse, because an alternative explanation involves them consuming narratives from the idiot box and repeating them without any meaningful consideration (ie. critical analysis) in-between.

 

[SKORPI0]

 

[Puffnstuff]

Brings back memories.

 

[madoka]

I believe Judge Kavanaugh is telling the truth, i'll give Dr. Ford enough credit that she thinks she is telling the truth, but memory can be a tricky thing, especially memories developed during therapy.

Well fortunately her memory seems to be improving over the years. At the is rate, I'm sure she'll remember exact details soon.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/10/visualize-this.php

 

[soundforbjt]

Who's lying? Collins: "It appears to be a very thorough investigation"

 

[Maxima1]

Who's lying? Collins: "It appears to be a very thorough investigation"

Another liar!

Flake: "We’ve seen no additional corroborating information"

 

[soundforbjt]

Another liar!

Flake: "We’ve seen no additional corroborating information"

We didn't look, so we couldn't find any...

 

[snoopy7548]

When you don't even talk to the accuser and accused, it is not a thorough investigation. Multiple witnesses even tried to contact the FBI with no luck.

 

[Jhhnn]

Kavanaugh lied in his testimony last Thursday. That's indisputable. What Ford did or did not get right is immaterial to that simple fact. She's not the one being promoted to the SCOTUS, anyway. Kavanaugh is, and he clearly lacks the integrity to serve all the People of America.

Is that too simple?

 

[SKORPI0]

Well fortunately her memory seems to be improving over the years. At the is rate, I'm sure she'll remember exact details soon.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/10/visualize-this.php

I think she mentioned July 1, 1982, a Thursday. So she was about 15 yrs 7 months, him 17 yrs 4 months.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/10/03/feds-zeroing-july-1-1982-party-key-fords-allegations/

 

[mikeymikec]

Who's lying? Collins: "It appears to be a very thorough investigation"

Just give us a sign, Lord, that more investigation needs to be done!
<earthquake tremor>
Any sign at all!