You don’t think it’s relevant? Kavanaugh is being raked over the coals about his high school drinking. Wonder if her drinking that night could have altered her perception of what happened... Not suppose to ask that though.
I was honestly considering adding to my previous post "don't answer my question with a question", because I was sure that was going to happen. What would the point of asking her that from that point of view be? Kavanaugh already claimed that nothing happened and dodged the question about whether he ever got black-out drunk. She's crystal-clear in her assertion that he sexually assaulted her.
Alcohol intake is important in some situations regarding sexual allegations for three reasons:
1) Inhibitions: Would one act on sexual urges as a result of alcohol intake in situations that one normally wouldn't.
2) Memory
3) "Was it consensual or not"
Since Kavanaugh asserts that nothing happened between them, then the third point goes right out the window. Since her inhibitions are hardly in question as she was the victim and Kavanaugh asserts that nothing happened between them, the first point goes out the window. How exactly does the second point have a leg to stand on? "Are you sure you're remembering being sexually assaulted?" "Do you think I'd be here testifying with 100% certainty that he assaulted me if I wasn't?".
Asking Kavanaugh about his drinking on the other hand is relevant since he's the alleged aggressor in this situation. It's relevant on the first point, the second point, but not the third since neither are claiming any level of consent in their association.