- Oct 9, 1999
- 39,234
- 701
- 126
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: bernse
Yes. Having a half million (or so) asset is "poor" managment. It looks great if you have your money tied up in uncashable $$$ when your house gets taken away because you can't make the payments for whatever reasons.
Like I said - even if it costs you a couple points, its worth it. If you have to suffer to pay it off (cash savings, whatever) don't.. but if you can do it otherwise, go for it.
If the interest rates go up a few points and you see all these poor slobs that are pushed to the limit for fianancing, and you own your own home clear, it'll be an easy sell.. and maybe buy some other properties for cheap while some (or many?) are in bankruptcy.
Like I said, speak with a financial planner as you throw money away. I mean it's not like I'm preaching anything new. Somebody needs to do the math.
As I said earlier, I want my money to work for me...not against me.
Look at the market and tell me that it's went up 7% per year for the last 5 years? Sure, there are funds that may have done it and there are definitely stocks that have done it. Would I have picked one of them? Guaranteed? Nobody knows including me. I do know one thing...I've got a 7% return on my mortgage that's not being paid.
And as for the tax deduction, I don't really mind as I would rather have 100% - taxes than pay 100% and get tax deduction!
Originally posted by: skyking
If it takes the savings too low, I'd tend to agree. If he has 6 month's expenses left over after doing it, then I'd go for it. Heck, I AM going for it
That's the only reason that I may not go for it, as it would wipe my savings (although low) out. I could tap a Roth in an emergency, but would rather not. I may just wait until Feb. to throw the tax refund toward the bill and then wipe it out then!
I wanted to do it before I'm 37 (Jan. 4th), but I guess I won't die!