Good point. I guess the real question is what kind of numbers you're talking about as far as the women who might not otherwise get involved (assuming illegality of prostitution) vs. the numbers who might take the plunge if it were legal (and they therefore knew they wouldn't get the crap beaten out of them by their pimp every other day).Originally posted by: HotChic
Originally posted by: Fausto1
Yeah, but prostitution is going to happen anyway no matter what you do. People will always want sex and other people will always need money and be willing to do almost anything about it. If it were legal and regulated, you'd be able to keep the spread of STDs in check to an extent and you'd also take away the pimp's power to abuse the women who work for him or his ability to keep them on a "leash" via drug addiction. Everyone wins.
There! That's exactly what I think is messed up about this whole equation. I think prostitution would capitalize on people's desperation when they need money, taking advantage of the poor, if you will. If someone doesn't want to sell their body as a cum receptacle, yet it's that or welfare, it would make it really hard to choose not to do that.
This is less of a conversation about legalizing prostitution for women who find it a legitimate profession and desire to do it, than it is a conversation about legalizing prostitution for women who have almost no other options. The majority of women in this profession will always be the ones who are desperate. :|
Kind of a chicken/egg thing really though as some desperate women will always get involved in prostitution (even though it's illegal and they are at high risk for physical abuse/arrest/STDs/etc). Legalizing and regulating the "profession" would greatly improve the quality of life for these women, but might inadvertently bring more into the trade. Which is the greater evil?