interchange
Diamond Member
- Oct 10, 1999
- 8,022
- 2,872
- 136
Ted Cruz thinks we should do nothing because only a quarter of the reported threats are violent.
So, what is needed, 50%?Ted Cruz thinks we should do nothing because only a quarter of the reported threats are violent.
The chicken shit won’t defend his wife. So that % will have to be far higherSo, what is needed, 50%?
Has a FEDERAL crime been committed?
That would be the determining factor.
What a couple bullshit poll questions. Can you make them any more stupid and biased ? No, no you couldn't even if you fucking tried.
1. Yes, school officials need Federal protection and the FBI is the only one that can provide it.
2. No, school officials should all rot in hell!!
I’m confused, are you ok with the FBI not going after those people or are you fine with it? Do you hold the same feelings about the insurrection perpetrators?
I'll answer for him. He believes in the Ron Johnson defense. He's comfortable with what white Trump supporters did on Jan 6. BLM supporters, his opinion would be different.
14,000 plus arrest related to Floyd protests.Left wing agitators are dangerous and liable to burn down your city at any time. There is nothing confusing about that.
And the Jan 6th perps have had the weight of the gov upon them from the beginning for committing crimes.
Dont you think its time for the same standard to be applied equally?
14,000 plus arrest related to Floyd protests.
What exactly are you wanting? Lynching?
You tiny brain does know that many of those so called left wing agitators were actually right wing nut jobs fueling the flames ..right? Or do your handlers not share those facts with you?Left wing agitators are dangerous and liable to burn down your city at any time. There is nothing confusing about that.
And the Jan 6th perps have had the weight of the gov upon them from the beginning for committing crimes.
Dont you think its time for the same standard to be applied equally?
Here you go. Man pleads guilty to firing at Minneapolis precinct.An arrest is not a conviction, most had their charges dropped and few faced any repercussions.
Here you go. Man pleads guilty to firing at Minneapolis precinct.
Texas man in 'boogaloo' movement pleads guilty to firing at police station during Floyd protest
Ivan Harrison Hunter, a self-proclaimed member of the “boogaloo bois,” is accused of firing 13 rounds from a semi-automatic assault-style rifle at a Minneapolis station.www.google.com
Also. You claims are false. The Jan 6 people were not treated more harshly. If anything the fact that basically no one was arrested while storming the capital and trying to subvert democracy speaks otherwise.
Records rebut claims of unequal treatment of Jan. 6 rioters
Some people charged in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and their Republican allies claim the Justice Department is treating them harshly because of their political views.apnews.com
You are either incredibly intellectually dishonest or just manipulated by conservative talking points.
Here you go. Man pleads guilty to firing at Minneapolis precinct.
Texas man in 'boogaloo' movement pleads guilty to firing at police station during Floyd protest
Ivan Harrison Hunter, a self-proclaimed member of the “boogaloo bois,” is accused of firing 13 rounds from a semi-automatic assault-style rifle at a Minneapolis station.www.google.com
Also. You claims are false. The Jan 6 people were not treated more harshly. If anything the fact that basically no one was arrested while storming the capital and trying to subvert democracy speaks otherwise.
Records rebut claims of unequal treatment of Jan. 6 rioters
Some people charged in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and their Republican allies claim the Justice Department is treating them harshly because of their political views.apnews.com
You are either incredibly intellectually dishonest or just manipulated by conservative talking points.
You can keep bringing up examples of the January riot but dont expect me to defend them. However, you seem keenly interested in defending your left wing agitators.
I hope you continue to do so when cities are on fire again due to their antics, which again, will go unpunished.
You can keep bringing up examples of the January riot but dont expect me to defend them. However, you seem keenly interested in defending your left wing agitators.
I hope you continue to do so when cities are on fire again due to their antics, which again, will go unpunished.
The way you asked is bullshit. I asked what is really going on. Ever heard of truth? Try it sometime.What a couple bullshit poll questions. Can you make them any more stupid and biased ? No, no you couldn't even if you fucking tried.
1. Yes, school officials need Federal protection and the FBI is the only one that can provide it.
2. No, school officials should all rot in hell!!
Have you ever once condemned those people for the Jan 6 insurrection?WTF? You are a nincompoop and are unable to speak for me or anyone else since you cant even form good sentences.
Ultimately the courts decide. But you do a "sniff test" of the complaint before you investigate anything at all. If it's obviously not going to meet any legal threshold, stop there. If not, then next talk to local law enforcement that punted on it, do another sniff test at that level, and so forth.
The important thing is more intangible, which is the disposition of the feds. If they're on a "mission," then that could go in a scary direction easily, as post 9/11 taught us. The disposition should only be "we're the last resort if local authorities egregiously fail to act. We aren't going to intercede in borderline cases." Abstracting away the current issue, I'm wary of expanding the venn diagram of acts that can prosecuted both at the state and federal level, as giving government two bites at the apple.
Out of curiosity, would you support federal prosecution of rioters and looters in, say, BLM protests, when state and local authorities fail to act?
Your posting history indicates that you would not be so apologetic to criminal threats of violence if those threats were coming from different persons, with whom you do not align with politically. Can you explain the reason for the obviously apparent bias?Yes if true threats. No if just aggressive/rude.
Your posting history indicates that you would not be so apologetic to criminal threats of violence if those threats were coming from different persons, with whom you do not align with politically. Can you explain the reason for the obviously apparent bias?