Sometime today a certain group just stared posting....weird.
You mean those armed insurrectionist immigrants that are storming our border?Not only are you a shitbag because you want to shoot and grenade immigrants, you're also a shitbag because you support treason against the US government by default as a Republican.
So, if nothing else, you're a consistent shitbag.
It must be a plot ? Right?Sometime today a certain group just stared posting....weird.
How many people crossing the border are trying to overthrow the government.You mean those armed insurrectionist immigrants that are storming our border?
You must do a Benghazi comparison to test the voracity of your convictions. That tells if your opinion is coming from an honest place.They turned down an option they should have taken as I said. They could still negotiate. I'm not doing a Bengazi comparison... I didn't object then and I'm not objecting now. You asked a poll question and I gave you my honest answer.
This is not legit in my opinion as it is too one sided.
You must do a Benghazi comparison to test the voracity of your convictions. That tells if your opinion is coming from an honest place.
BTW - As I stated they tried negotiating and McCarthy stabbed the negotiator in the back. What else could the Dems give the Republicans assuming as you suggest they keep negotiating again??
You know 'arms' don't have to be firearms, don't you? There were plenty of clubs, batons, brass knuckles, flagpoles used as spears, chemical agents ......You could search any condo complex or apartment building in this country and find more arms then this so called "armed insurrection" had on them. What did they find? 2? 3?
I voted no.
I agree they should have taken the deal at this:
"There would have been equal representation among Democrats and Republicans. Nobody on the committee would be a current member of Congress or running for office. Both sides would have had subpoena powers. "
But after it was turned down what Nancy is doing:
"Pelosi will now run a select committee where Democrats are the majority and have sole subpoena power. "
Is not legit.
I voted no.
I agree they should have taken the deal at this:
"There would have been equal representation among Democrats and Republicans. Nobody on the committee would be a current member of Congress or running for office. Both sides would have had subpoena powers. "
But after it was turned down what Nancy is doing:
"Pelosi will now run a select committee where Democrats are the majority and have sole subpoena power. "
Is not legit.
Show us where it's illegal.
Show you where what is illegal?
I don't know what you are talking about.
Who said it was illegal?
So once again all Republicans have to do to make anything illegitimate is to refuse to participate?They turned down an option they should have taken as I said. They could still negotiate. I'm not doing a Bengazi comparison... I didn't object then and I'm not objecting now. You asked a poll question and I gave you my honest answer.
This is not legit in my opinion as it is too one sided.
So once again all Republicans have to do to make anything illegitimate is to refuse to participate?
I'm asking if it is. You said you considered it illegitimate, I'm asking if it's illegal.
Your original response was to demand I "show us where it is illegal.".
Legitimate (legit) doesn't only mean legal as in the Law, I know you must know this already, but your demand lends to question that.
I said it isn't legit in my opinion. As her plan is just an act of retribution for the R's refusal to accept the offer (which I think was stupid on the R's part). That was as good a deal as they were ever going to get and better than what I expected. They made their bed and now they have to sleep in it. Just like Nancy and her vindictive plan. Regardless of how fair or even handed it is handled the optics are terrible.
Your mental gymnastics are astounding, clown.Your original response was to demand I "show us where it is illegal.".
Legitimate (legit) doesn't only mean legal as in the Law, I know you must know this already, but your demand lends to question that.
I said it isn't legit in my opinion. As her plan is just an act of retribution for the R's refusal to accept the offer (which I think was stupid on the R's part). That was as good a deal as they were ever going to get and better than what I expected. They made their bed and now they have to sleep in it. Just like Nancy and her vindictive plan. Regardless of how fair or even handed it is handled the optics are terrible.