Guiliani desparately trying to create it in the Ukraine at this moment.Where is the exculpatory evidence?
I hate saying this, but the fact that he commented without completing his investigation should be.....wait for it.....investigated by the DOJ IG.They're trying to contract it out to he Ukrainians. Oh, and Durham commenting publicly about an ongoing investigation is highly unprofessional. His partisan petticoats are showing. Expect his investigation to go on as long as possible & deliver nothing.
Also, hopefully at that point, Trump's financial empire will be exposed for either being not nearly as big as he likes everyone to believe and or that he's a tax cheat (par for the course for billionaires) and or a money launderer.I hate saying this, but the fact that he commented without completing his investigation should be.....wait for it.....investigated by the DOJ IG.
I believe Horowitz’s report and the general conclusion that career FBI personnel did not act with malice or political intent, despite there being a few procedural errors and one fairly large error in judgment. His report puts to bed the FBI deep state conspirarcy theories.The log awaited investigation of the investigation by IG Horowitz is completed and found there was proper cause to launch the investigation and no political bias was involved.
No evidence Obama "spied" on Trump or did anything improper related to Trump.
Bill Barr came out right behind it and stated his complete disagreement with the results. The Head of the FBI agreed with the IG report and will take action to shore up any shortcoming by the FBI.
My question, who do you believe? Show your work/reasons
Here are the biggest takeaways from the DOJ watchdog's highly anticipated report on the Russia probe's origins
Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on the origins of the Russia probe debunked many of President Trump's claims but found some wrongdoing.www.businessinsider.com
Not really. The meeting was inappropriate and both should have known better.Kinda puts the Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting into perspective
That's not the issue. Its inappropriate vs downright corrupt yet the right were ready to have Lynch impeached.Not really. The meeting was inappropriate and both should have known better.
That such a meeting happened at all is an indicator of corruption in and of itself. It also has nothing to do with the charges Trump now faces, but you brought Lynch into the discussion.That's not the issue. Its inappropriate vs downright corrupt yet the right were ready to have Lynch impeached.
Durham weighing in after the IG report says to me that he has something on somebody. He has way more scope and power than the IG. I'm very curious what his investigation turns up and how it will compare to the IG report. The IG doesn't indict people, but Durham can and most likely will, if he has something that rises to the level of criminal wrong doing. If, if, if, obviously.
So you would be willing to impeach Lynch on the suspicion of corruption yet Trump's corruption in the open is just a ho hum?That such a meeting happened at all is an indicator of corruption in and of itself. It also has nothing to do with the charges Trump now faces, but you brought Lynch into the discussion.
Barr gave NBC an interview where he essentially throws the IG report in the trash and claims that his probe will be the real deal. This is the same guy who was personally chasing down bogus leads in Italy to prove out Trump's insane ramblings and various right wing fever dreams.
It's full of Trump's conspiratorial lies and general horseshit.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...th-probing-trump-n1098986?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma
If Conservatives really want to turn the DOJ into a fully partisan vehicle maybe they should think down the road another cycle or two because they won't be in power forever. Clearly that's too much to ask.
I believe Horowitz’s report and the general conclusion that career FBI personnel did not act with malice or political intent, despite there being a few procedural errors and one fairly large error in judgment. His report puts to bed the FBI deep state conspirarcy theories.
The Barr sanctioned investigation is broader in scope and is casting a wider net. He has a higher barrier of trust to overcome, and I would not accept anything less than a smoking gun revelation. I don’t expect his investigation to uncover anything new, but can’t assess something that is still in motion.
A “higher barrier of trust to overcome?” Ya think??I believe Horowitz’s report and the general conclusion that career FBI personnel did not act with malice or political intent, despite there being a few procedural errors and one fairly large error in judgment. His report puts to bed the FBI deep state conspirarcy theories.
The Barr sanctioned investigation is broader in scope and is casting a wider net. He has a higher barrier of trust to overcome, and I would not accept anything less than a smoking gun revelation. I don’t expect his investigation to uncover anything new, but can’t assess something that is still in motion.
Durham weighing in after the IG report says to me that he has something on somebody. He has way more scope and power than the IG. I'm very curious what his investigation turns up and how it will compare to the IG report. The IG doesn't indict people, but Durham can and most likely will, if he has something that rises to the level of criminal wrong doing. If, if, if, obviously.
I’ve said Trump should be impeached on numerous occasions.So you would be willing to impeach Lynch on the suspicion of corruption yet Trump's corruption in the open is just a ho hum?
The different standards of behavior are glaringly obvious
That you even have to ask the question tells me everything I need to knowWhat was that large error in judgement, anyway?
Durham weighing in after the IG report says to me that he has something on somebody. He has way more scope and power than the IG. I'm very curious what his investigation turns up and how it will compare to the IG report. The IG doesn't indict people, but Durham can and most likely will, if he has something that rises to the level of criminal wrong doing. If, if, if, obviously.
That you even have to ask the question tells me everything I need to know
That you even have to ask the question tells me everything I need to know
Durham weighing in after the IG report says to me that he has something on somebody. He has way more scope and power than the IG. I'm very curious what his investigation turns up and how it will compare to the IG report. The IG doesn't indict people, but Durham can and most likely will, if he has something that rises to the level of criminal wrong doing. If, if, if, obviously.
Except he’s paid the $2 million, so the fact he was guilty no longer matters to his base (rich people justice applies—if you can pay the fine keep doing the crime.)Trumps charity fraud should be be enough for him to be removed from office.
Comparing is not defending. Big difference going 5 mph over the speed limit vs 40 over. That's why enforcement and punishment are different as well.I’ve said Trump should be impeached on numerous occasions.
Impeachment isn’t a comparative scale. It’s a threshold. Once you’ve passed it...
You’re the one defending Lynch.