Poll: Would you date a tough girl?

[Nitemare]

linky

So would you ever date someone who was tougher than you?

 

[Kev]

i dont understand what is the relationship between the title and topic?

 

[cjchaps]

What?

 

[Nitemare]

clarified it

 

[pdo]

she can tie me up and spank me anytime.

 

[WillyF1uhm1]

Why not? She looks fine to me.

 

[MichaelD]

That's a big NEGATIVE there, Nitemare. I don't go for that whole "Tomboy-Butch-Gang-girl" look/mindset. I like my women feminine, dainty, wearing makeup and wearing a dress. Jeans are great, but nothing turns me on like a woman in a fairly short miniskirt/business suit getup. Here in south Texas, we have lots of girls under 25 who would be pretty if they cleaned up, but choose to wear the "Gang-girl Look" I.E. Baggy men's jeans/big t-shirt not tucked in, baseball cap sideways, big Mr. T gold chain. You know, the Hispanic gang-banger, South Central LA Snoop Dog Fan, White Trailer Trash look.

And no, I won't apologize for saying any of it. So there.

 

[ravanux]

i could. if she was a little thuggish too. there is something really fine about a girl with some baggy pants and a bad attitude. YOWZERS!!!

 

[Elledan]

I like strong, intelligent women. I don't 'date', however

 

[Sigurd]

<< I like strong, intelligent women. I don't 'date', however >>



Uhh...why?

 

[Danman]

<< That's a big NEGATIVE there, Nitemare. I don't go for that whole "Tomboy-Butch-Gang-girl" look/mindset. I like my women feminine, dainty, wearing makeup and wearing a dress. Jeans are great, but nothing turns me on like a woman in a fairly short miniskirt/business suit getup. Here in south Texas, we have lots of girls under 25 who would be pretty if they cleaned up, but choose to wear the "Gang-girl Look" I.E. Baggy men's jeans/big t-shirt not tucked in, baseball cap sideways, big Mr. T gold chain. You know, the Hispanic gang-banger, South Central LA Snoop Dog Fan, White Trailer Trash look.

And no, I won't apologize for saying any of it. So there. >>




ROFLAMO! That's a negative for me too........it scares me that a girl could kick my ass...

 

[Elledan]

<<

<< I like strong, intelligent women. I don't 'date', however >>



Uhh...why? >>

To be honest, I consider dating a waste of time.

 

[Nitemare]

<<

<<

<< I like strong, intelligent women. I don't 'date', however >>



Uhh...why? >>

To be honest, I consider dating a waste of time. >>



What do you do, pay for it then? :Q

or would that be Thumbelina and her four sisters? :Q

 

[Elledan]

<<

<<

<<

<< I like strong, intelligent women. I don't 'date', however >>



Uhh...why? >>

To be honest, I consider dating a waste of time. >>



What do you do, pay for it then? :Q

or would that be Thumbelina and her four sisters? :Q >>


Are you talking about mating? I don't feel any need for it , so no, I don't pay for it either.

 

[Daniel]

<<
Are you talking about mating? I don't feel any need for it , so no, I don't pay for it either. >>



If you don't mind me asking, how old are you? And did you have some horrible experience that would make you feel that way or just a personal decision?

Anyway back on topic, umm no I wouldn't want to date a girl that was more "tough" than myself, I've dated a couple girls I knew from martial arts schools and most of them
just did it for fun so it was totally normal but one girl after I knew her for awhile always thought she was really tough and it was completely annoying.

 

[Jzero]

"Tough" and "White Trash" are two different things.
My GF is an "equestrienne" and she's not buff, but you don't get weak from shoving around 1/2 a ton of beef, and you certainly don't have flimsy legs riding English-style...
She's "tough" but she's still soft and feminine...and she sure looks sweet wearing jodhpurs and packing a riding crop, but that's a story for another thread.

Sorry, no pics.

 

[Elledan]

<<

<<
Are you talking about mating? I don't feel any need for it , so no, I don't pay for it either. >>



If you don't mind me asking, how old are you? >>

I'm 18.


<< And did you have some horrible experience that would make you feel that way or just a personal decision? >>

Just a personal decision. I see mating as something solely to be used to create offspring and not as something to be used for (personal) pleasure.

 

[HelloBrother]

Like librarian and Grammy in Tomcats..I will take the librarian

 

[Daniel]

<< Just a personal decision. I see mating as something solely to be used to create offspring and not as something to be used for (personal) pleasure. >>



Well umm more power to you I guess, I don't really understand it and I guess it would have saved me a lot of pain over the years but I wouldn't trade it, but to each his/her own.

 

[CraigRT]

probably not.. that's f'ing weird..

 

[Jzero]

<< Just a personal decision. I see mating as something solely to be used to create offspring and not as something to be used for (personal) pleasure. >>



Wow...that's a pretty bizarre stance considering your religious bent...or lack thereof...that's a very "Catholic" viewpoint...

 

[MichaelD]

Need to rename this thread "Would you mate with a "Tough Girl?"

 

[Elledan]

<<

<< Just a personal decision. I see mating as something solely to be used to create offspring and not as something to be used for (personal) pleasure. >>



Wow...that's a pretty bizarre stance considering your religious bent...or lack thereof...that's a very "Catholic" viewpoint... >>


No.. it's not... the Catholic 'way' is that any form of anti-conception is forbidden, which results in large numbers of offspring, because the average person can NOT control his/her urges/instincts. Married, Catholic females would thefore almost continuously be pregnant or giving birth to offspring.

My 'way' is based on that assumption that only a certain number of offspring is required for a generation and that normally (i.e. by every species, including Primates) certain 'laws' regulate the size of the population. Disease and death becomes more common as the population increases in size. Eventually diseases will kill a large part of the population, so that the natural balance is restored again.

IMHO, this is not necessary. We are an intelligent species (well, somewhat), therefore we can do it ourselves. Of course, we'll have to weed out the weaker individuals in order to keep a healthy population, but it's a more desirable way than just mate-and-see-what-happens.

 

[chibchakan]

<< Would you date a tough girl? >>



HEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL NNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOO

 

[Jzero]

<< No.. it's not... the Catholic 'way' is that any form of anti-conception is forbidden >>



Contraceptives are verboten as a result of the catholic (and Christian, in general) concept that "Sex is for PROcreation not REcreation." The two go hand-in-hand of course, but the reasoning behind it is that if you're using a contraceptive, you're obviously in it for fun, which is "wrong."

Which is exactly what you said before....I was just commenting on the fact that, at least in the words you originally used, it's something taught in western religions, but you don't follow those religions.

As you explain it further, it fits more in with your MO.