Possible 10th planet discovered...

[Finalnight]

"While NASA remains intentionally vague, promising only a news conference Monday, The Australian has the details. The new planet, dubbed Sedna after the Inuit goddess of the sea, is 3 billion km further from the sun than Pluto, and is slightly smaller at 2000km in diameter. This discovery has apparently reignited the debate as to how big a solar object must be in order to qualify as a 'planet', but it is significant nonetheless."

Got this off Slashdot

 

[silverpig]

They already had a debated 10th planet... so this'd be the 11th

 

[Evadman]

there are only 8 planets anyway. Pluto != planet

 

[silverpig]

Most would consider the upper mass limit of a planet to be ~13 Jupiter masses; what is required to begin fusion. The lower limit is debated as it's really a continuum and defining a cut off point is arbitrary. One definition I've heard and like is an object massive enough that, under self gravitation, has turned itself into a rough sphere.

Of course, said object must be orbiting a star.

 

[SherEPunjab]

its amazing how ATOT'rs can go from topics such as this to banging their wives and back all within 24 hours. Kudos! :beer:

 

[Hector13]

Originally posted by: silverpig
Most would consider the upper mass limit of a planet to be ~13 Jupiter masses; what is required to begin fusion. The lower limit is debated as it's really a continuum and defining a cut off point is arbitrary. One definition I've heard and like is an object massive enough that, under self gravitation, has turned itself into a rough sphere.

Of course, said object must be orbiting a star.

using that definition, my old boss could be the 10th planet...

 

[ChrisIsBored]

Originally posted by: Hector13

Originally posted by: silverpig
Most would consider the upper mass limit of a planet to be ~13 Jupiter masses; what is required to begin fusion. The lower limit is debated as it's really a continuum and defining a cut off point is arbitrary. One definition I've heard and like is an object massive enough that, under self gravitation, has turned itself into a rough sphere.

Of course, said object must be orbiting a star.

using that definition, my old boss could be the 10th planet...

uhh.. hah?

 

[IshmaelLeaver]

I'm really not interested in what lies past Uranus.

 

[MacBaine]

Originally posted by: Evadman
there are only 8 planets anyway. Pluto != planet

Fortunately, you aren't calling the shots.

 

[hjo3]

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: Evadman
there are only 8 planets anyway. Pluto != planet

Fortunately, you aren't calling the shots.

Maybe not, but NASA agrees with him.

 

[mugs]

Originally posted by: IshmaelLeaver
I'm really not interested in what lies past Uranus.

Heh... heh.

 

[SunnyD]

Originally posted by: silverpig
Of course, said object must be orbiting a star.

So given that the lower limit is scalable - we would have countless planets, considering the many thousands of asteroids and comets that "orbit" the Sun.

 

[PowerMacG5]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: Evadman
there are only 8 planets anyway. Pluto != planet

Fortunately, you aren't calling the shots.

Maybe not, but NASA agrees with him.

:beer:

Originally posted by: SunnyD

Originally posted by: silverpig
Of course, said object must be orbiting a star.

So given that the lower limit is scalable - we would have countless planets, considering the many thousands of asteroids and comets that "orbit" the Sun.

I think he meant a more or less circular orbit. Yes, nothing orbits the sun circularly, it is an elliptical orbit with the Sun at one of the fociii, but the orbits, nonetheless, are "circular." An asteroid or comet orbits the sun in an extremely elongated ellipse.

 

[silverpig]

Originally posted by: SunnyD

Originally posted by: silverpig
Of course, said object must be orbiting a star.

So given that the lower limit is scalable - we would have countless planets, considering the many thousands of asteroids and comets that "orbit" the Sun.

We COULD, depending on where the limit is set yes.

 

[silverpig]

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: Evadman
there are only 8 planets anyway. Pluto != planet

Fortunately, you aren't calling the shots.

Maybe not, but NASA agrees with him.

The IAU trumps NASA

When did nasa go back on this?

Another


These were the latest I found.

 

[hjo3]

Originally posted by: silverpig

Originally posted by: hjo3

Originally posted by: MacBaine

Originally posted by: Evadman
there are only 8 planets anyway. Pluto != planet

Fortunately, you aren't calling the shots.

Maybe not, but NASA agrees with him.

The IAU trumps NASA

When did nasa go back on this?

Another


These were the latest I found.

pwned!

 

[kenshorin]

Originally posted by: SunnyD

Originally posted by: silverpig
Of course, said object must be orbiting a star.

So given that the lower limit is scalable - we would have countless planets, considering the many thousands of asteroids and comets that "orbit" the Sun.

Convenient that you ignored and edited out the rest of his post that said "an object massive enough that, under self gravitation, has turned itself into a rough sphere."

That would eliminate all asteroids and comets.

 

[XZeroII]

Is everyone forgetting about planet X???

 

[Regs]

It' a big ball of ice 3 billion kilometers from pluto. Just another object getting pulled with the suns gravity.

 

[Triumph]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
Is everyone forgetting about planet X???

i thought this was the supposed planet X.

i hope they never find Dimension X. we don't need to make it any easier for the technodrome to make it back here.

 

[xSauronx]

Originally posted by: Regs
It' a big ball of ice 3 billion kilometers from pluto. Just another object getting pulled with the suns gravity.

indeed, they do need some guidelines....a large ball of rock and ice shouldnt qualify as a planet, but rather a large ball of rock that people thought was rather nifty

 

[Saulbadguy]

Is it made of Spare ribs? would you eat it if it was?

 

[JetsFanatic]

Pluto is a Dog

 

[ragazzo]

Originally posted by: IshmaelLeaver
I'm really not interested in what lies past Uranus.

Originally posted by: MacBaine
Fortunately, you aren't calling the shots.

 

[TheAudit]

Wrong!
Rosie O'Donnell is the tenth planet.