Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Where is the "3Dmark is useless and misleading" option?
why would we have a false and misleading option?
it has it uses
Because it does just that?
It gives far, far too much credit towards dual core processes. Its misleading to the point, where its down right lying.
I had a 3700+@2750Mhz, with SLI'd 7800GTX's. Got 6328 for the score. Then had the exact same system, but with an Opty at 2635Mhz and one revision of newer drivers, and got 8011. Same cards, same mobo, same everything, but the CPU and one revision of a newer driver. Ive still got links for both scores.
Dont even attempt to try and explain that its not a false representation of a score. If anything, the 3700+ would be faster due to the 100+ more Mhz it had. Dual core is not going to help much, if at all at 1280x1024. The same score difference was there even at 1920x1200, which is simply idiotic. According to 3dmark, my Opty should be much, much faster in games. But guess what, it wasnt. Imagine my surprise! Or not... I realize its supposed to give you an idea of what games will run like in the future, hence the name. To this day, there isnt one game where my Opty would have been faster.
There was a time when 3dmark was actually useful, those times are long gone. All it does it make people think they need to upgrade, and mislead people who dont know any better. Oh yeah, and make people have "competitions" to see who can get a higher score.
But Im done ranting. Have fun in this thread and bragging about a useless score.