Post your 3dmark05 results

[gururu]

get it here

its not pretty for the 5700U

 

[scooter1]

that link doesn't work for me. how big is the download?

 

[kylebisme]

290.2 mb, I'm geting it from fileshack.

 

[obeseotron]

filerush started at 300k/sec for me, and has steadily been dropping over the course of the file, i think its down to 60 or so with 90mb to go, so i think ill make it, seems like the server is getting hit and will soon be full and slow.

 

[garikfox]

Forceware 66.70 No OC


http://members.cox.net/garikfox/mark.jpg

 

[Marsumane]

Link isnt working for some reason. I'll try fileshack also.

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Guru3D has a torrent, don't they?

- M4H

 

[MDE]

Grabbing it from BitTorrent, probably a lot faster than anything else right now.

EDIT: Major Geeks has the Torrent I found.

 

[lordtyranus]

x800s are going strong. I believe this is purely SM 2, right? Is there SM3 available?

 

[Rent]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Guru3D has a torrent, don't they?

- M4H

Yeah, they do. I'm grabbing off of Torrent now.

 

[apoppin]

7229 marks





not mine



Nvidia has today claimed that results for its Geforce 6800 Ultra SLI outstrip its competitors.

n a statement, the company said that in benchmark tests it conducted using 3dMark05, it scored 7229 marks, and that is an industry best.

The tests were donducted using two GeForce 6800 Ultra PCI Express cards running in SLI mode on an Intel Tumwater based chipset, and using a Pentium 4 3.4GHz Extreme Edition processor, using the ForeWare 66.51 driver.

:shocked:


:roll:

 

[lordtyranus]

n a statement, the company said that in benchmark tests it conducted using 3dMark05, it scored 7229 marks, and that is an industry best.

Nvidia just got pwned.

Text

 

[Marsumane]

Originally posted by: gururu
get it here

its not pretty for the 5700U

What odd results. 5950 is below the 9600xt, the x800p is tied w/ the GT, and the x800xtpe beats the 6800u by a decent margin. Very odd benchmark in my opinion. I can understand where some of those may come into play, but all 3 scenarios simotaniously? the 9600xt has a better pixel shader then the 5950 but less fillrate, and bandwidth. The x800xtpe is slightly better on filrate/memory bandwidth then the 6800u, but not by much at all. When it has its advantages, its usually by a smaller margin then this. Also, the 6800GT has memory and filrate over the x800p (i think) which negates ati's speculated advantage on the x800xtpe part. My conclusion is its either how its coded to favor ati's archetecture more so then either of nv's archetectures, or ati just has better drivers for it so far because archetectureally i dont see what point is ati's advantage. Its not like their PS2.0 shaders are THAT much better then The NV40's. Its usually shown to be quite close in other benches.

The only thing i could think of, is that the clockspeed really matters on the xtpe and thus the 6800ue would be more close to it due to its slightly higher clock compared to the ultra. But what about the 6800GT?

 

[lordtyranus]

The only thing i could think of, is that the clockspeed really matters on the xtpe and thus the 6800ue would be more close to it due to its slightly higher clock compared to the ultra. But what about the 6800GT?

Well, the x800 Pro and 6800 GT have nearly equal theoratical fillrates. The results seem to match Farcry performance rather closely.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: lordtyranus

n a statement, the company said that in benchmark tests it conducted using 3dMark05, it scored 7229 marks, and that is an industry best.

Nvidia just got pwned.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=781

Where? not YOUR link

Project Comparison
The project id is not valid - it is possible that this project has not been published. Please check the URL.

i'm glad to see the 9800xt 'hanging-in' with the best of today's mid-range cards
(since i still have one and am NOT upgrading)

 

[Rage187]

Remember kids, Ati says that benchmark numbers don't matter.


Put your fingers in your ears and go, la la la la la la la la la.....

 

[Marsumane]

Originally posted by: lordtyranus

n a statement, the company said that in benchmark tests it conducted using 3dMark05, it scored 7229 marks, and that is an industry best.

Nvidia just got pwned.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=781

Not at all. Its a benchmark. Remember? 3Dmark...nothing more. Also they have an option for those rich bastarrds w/ their sli setup, as well as the 6800GT matching ati's option at the same price. So basically they lost at their ultra (based on just one benchmark) as well as their entire FX line. As techreport said, both companies should be fairly pleased. Its not like another doom 3. I mean u cant even play this one, and the difference isnt even 1/2 of what doom 3 was percentage wise.

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Originally posted by: Rage187
Remember kids, Ati says that benchmark numbers don't matter.


Put your fingers in your ears and go, la la la la la la la la la.....

Originally posted by: Shamrock
on this 3dMock, will WADS be for movement, and mouse 1 button will be to fire? Dang, I forgot, you cant play it, but hey, download it, and get some good screenshots for wallpaper!

Shamrock for Teh Win.

- M4H

 

[lordtyranus]

Where? not YOUR link

Well, someone scored 7k 3dmarks with a single XTPE. Very close to the SLI setup.

Not at all. Its a benchmark. Remember? 3Dmark...nothing more

It is. But look how much importance a lot of uneducated people use 3dmark03 scores in deciding which gpu to buy. They can also use it for marketing purposes.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: Marsumane


Not at all. Its a benchmark. Remember? 3Dmark...nothing more. Also they have an option for those rich bastarrds w/ their sli setup, as well as the 6800GT matching ati's option at the same price. So basically they lost at their ultra (based on just one benchmark) as well as their entire FX line. As techreport said, both companies should be fairly pleased. Its not like another doom 3. I mean u cant even play this one, and the difference isnt even 1/2 of what doom 3 was percentage wise.

It is VERY important . . .


. . . . for a benchmark.

Both ATI and nVidia take it very seriously.

And Doom III is a really (really) crappy game with nice gfx . . . so what ? at least 3dMark is free.
:roll:

Originally posted by: lordtyranus

Where? not YOUR link

Well, someone scored 7k 3dmarks with a single XTPE. Very close to the SLI setup.

Perhaps it is "made-up" . . .. techreport is only getting 5771
:roll:

 

[Marsumane]

Originally posted by: lordtyranus

The only thing i could think of, is that the clockspeed really matters on the xtpe and thus the 6800ue would be more close to it due to its slightly higher clock compared to the ultra. But what about the 6800GT?

Well, the x800 Pro and 6800 GT have nearly equal theoratical fillrates. The results seem to match Farcry performance rather closely.

I didnt think the FX series did THIS bad in farcry. I mean below the 9600xt w/ the 5950? U also must be refering to earlier benches in farcry because if i remember right nv caught up quite a bit on that game. Also the 6600 series killed the x700 series if i remember right on farcry. And I yea i wasnt sure on the pro vs gt fillrate because i dont know the pro's clockspeed off of the top of my head. I just assumed the GT's fillrate was a bit higher due to having 4 quads vs the pro's 3 quad setup multiplying the clockspeed.

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Weird that the URL died so fast, I captured it though so here is the project the guy posted text

 

[Marsumane]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: Marsumane


Not at all. Its a benchmark. Remember? 3Dmark...nothing more. Also they have an option for those rich bastarrds w/ their sli setup, as well as the 6800GT matching ati's option at the same price. So basically they lost at their ultra (based on just one benchmark) as well as their entire FX line. As techreport said, both companies should be fairly pleased. Its not like another doom 3. I mean u cant even play this one, and the difference isnt even 1/2 of what doom 3 was percentage wise.

It is VERY important . . .


. . . . for a benchmark.

Both ATI and nVidia take it very seriously.

And Doom III is a really (really) crappy game with nice gfx . . . so what ? at least 3dMark is free.
:roll:

It may be quite repetative at times, but the game wasnt that bad. In any case, its an engine that will likely be used for other games. But yes i guess 3dmark is important to many ppl, just it shouldnt be to us; the people on the anandtech video forums that actually know hardware.

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Weird that the URL died so fast, I captured it though so here is the project the guy posted text

Can't read it.

Do you think it is for "real"? Techreport only got 5771 with the same GPU (and 3DMark probably IS gpu dependent)
:roll:

We know nVidia's SLI score is verifyable.

edit: Doom iii is the WORST (major-release) game i can remember (for YEARS)

 

[DAPUNISHER]

What browser you using brudda? It will enlarge for clarity