Post your Ryzen Blender Demo Scores! (AMD clarifies Blender Benchmark Confusion, Run @ 150 Samples)

[thesmokingman]

5960x at 4.5 GHz

100 samples 2.78a: 19.69
100 samples AVX256 optimized version: 13.80

edit: I had unity, multiple VS instances, and chrome with several tabs going so they weren't clean runs.

I don't think it mattered much lol.

 

[HilbertSpace]

I can't post a picture, but once you open the AMD blender file, on the right side of the screen there will be a 'Sampling' drop down menu open, where you can change the number of "Samples". Change "render: 200" to "render:100"

 

[Hail The Brain Slug]

I don't think it mattered much lol.

Just sitting, I have around 2-4% cpu usage between all of the programs I have open. The score would be slightly higher (or lower, however you count it) if I had a fresh boot with all unnecessary programs and processes closed.

 

[TheELF]

G1820 ....... at stock and 100 samples
3:27.84 that's ~208sec, hmmm divided by 24s.... adjusting for clockspeeds...hmmm

 

[VirtualLarry]

Ok, with 100 samples, my i6-6400 BLCK OC to 165.0 / 4.455Ghz in a B150 board, with 16GB DDR4-2400, scored 01:00.06.
Seems a little high to me?

Which renderer are you using? Mine defaulted to "Cycles", rather than "Blender".

 

[abiliocdf]

i7 5820k @ 3.4 Ghz 34.53s

 

[leper84]

4790K @stock with mediocre ram
W10-

100 samples- 40.48
200 samples- 1:20.41

 

[TheELF]

Which renderer are you using? Mine defaulted to "Cycles", rather than "Blender".

If you are asking me,I didn't change anything,other then the samples setting,cycles is the blender render engine though.

 

[inf64]

4690k @ 4.3Ghz, win10, 16GB ddr3 @ 2400mhz, blender 2.78a x64

100 samples: 59s.

 

[ddogg]

6700k @ 4.7 with DDR4-3600 RAM = 33.1s

 

[rvborgh]

i gave it a go on my 48 core quad Opteron 61xx machine (SuperMicro H8QGi-F w/48 K10 cores overclocked to 3.0 GHz) ...

results:
24.61 seconds... while consuming 931 watts at the wall Samples was set at 200 for this run.
18.72 seconds... samples set to 150
16.23 seconds... samples set to 128
12.86 seconds... samples set to 100

 

[sm625]

Is there not one person with a 6900k reading this thread? We need 6900k results more than anything in order to even begin to make sense of this.

 

[Cali3350]

4790K at stock settings (ran at 4300 on each core during test) with hyperthreading on.
DDR3 ram at 1200MHZ (2400).

40.66s with 100 samples.

 

[jpiniero]

Is there not one person with a 6900k reading this thread? We need 6900k results more than anything in order to even begin to make sense of this.

Based on Tom's review of Broadwell-E, the difference in Blender between it and Haswell-E is basically zero beyond clocks. Based upon XabanakFanatik's post 24-25 seconds seems about right on the non-AVX-256 build.

 

[moonbogg]

OK so AMD ran the demo with 150 samples, so I just ran mine with 150 and I got 47 seconds. We should be doing it with 150 to make a proper comparison.

 

[guskline]

Then something is off because no way a stock Zen lays waste like that to your chip @ 4.4 across all cores.

I just did it and got 1:03

I set the sample at 100 for my 5960x and at stock it was 27.62 seconds and at my 24/7 speed of 4.4Ghz it is 20.16 seconds.

My 6700k at 4.6Ghz and 100 sample is 33.23 seconds.

 

[AdamK47]

This is my first time using Blender. I think I got this right. To change the samples I set the "Render:" field under Sampling to 100 and then 150. To render the image I went to "Render --> Render Image" from the menu at the top.

Samples set to 100 - 16.95 seconds

Samples set to 150 - 24.92 seconds

6950X at 4.125GHz, my 24/7 overclock.

 

[thesmokingman]

OK so AMD ran the demo with 150 samples, so I just ran mine with 150 and I got 47 seconds. We should be doing it with 150 to make a proper comparison.

Don't worry, the whole internet is in the process of re-running at 150 samples.

 

[Hail The Brain Slug]

I ran my 5960x at 3.375 core/ 3.375 cache and 3.5 core/ 3.5 cache at 150 samples for three runs each.

This is a brand new Windows 10 install with zero background programs. I even waited for all background processes to stop so CPU usage was at 0%.

3.375: 38.81 / 38.15 / 38.15
3.500: 37.41 / 36.68 / 36.61

This still doesn't quite seem right compared to AMD's results, especially given my cache is technically overclocked at both speeds and I have fast memory (3000 MHz).

If the 6900k was running at 3.5 during the test, it sorta seems reasonable it might score 0.8 seconds faster. But this would make it seem AMD is claiming to have higher IPC than even Haswell, at least in this test.

 

[R0H1T]

This is my first time using Blender. I think I got this right. To change the samples I set the "Render:" field under Sampling to 100 and then 150. To render the image I went to "Render --> Render Image" from the menu at the top.

Samples set to 100 - 16.95 seconds

Samples set to 150 - 24.92 seconds

6950X at 4.125GHz, my 24/7 overclock.

That still looks off since some (unconfirmed?) reports suggest the score was 25s with SR7, at this point in time we might just as well throw any number out there & see what sticks

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O2Or6XOETZr3a4gLAuCuYEx8m5X_lv23LdwZiCZpBcM/edit

 

[BTRY B 529th FA BN]

Daily driver:
X58 - 6 core 12 threads
X5690 stock + Turbo (3.46GHz / 3.73GHz 1-2 cores)
Uncore - 2.66GHz
QPI - 3.2GHz
DDR3 - 1333MHz cl9

Blender @ 150 samples = 01:02:80
Blender @ 100 samples = 00:42:60

 

[polyzp]

That still looks off since some (unconfirmed?) reports suggest the score was 25s with SR7, at this point in time we might just as well throw any number out there & see what sticks

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O2Or6XOETZr3a4gLAuCuYEx8m5X_lv23LdwZiCZpBcM/edit

The SR7 scores are not clarified directly by AMD

Its 25 second score at 100 samples
and 36 seconds at 150 samples

There are two different test settings, dont confuse them!

 

[R0H1T]

The SR7 scores are not clarified directly by AMD

Its 25 second score at 100 samples
and 36 seconds at 150 samples

There are two different test settings, dont confuse them!

Yes that's what I meant, except the 36s score is supposed to be with 200 samples (according to the spreadsheet linked by AMD_james) & then there is a new file with samples prefixed at 150?

www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5idz87/ryzen_blender_benchmark_comparison_spreadsheet/

 

[Valantar]

Retested with 150 samples.

Again, Core 2 Quad Q9450 @3,52GHz, 8GB DDR2-1066

02:55.15 - 175,15 seconds

With a whole bunch of background (and foreground) processes, mind you.

Still, seems like MT performance is really where CPUs are progressing. This is interesting.

 

[AdamK47]

That still looks off since some (unconfirmed?) reports suggest the score was 25s with SR7, at this point in time we might just as well throw any number out there & see what sticks

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O2Or6XOETZr3a4gLAuCuYEx8m5X_lv23LdwZiCZpBcM/edit

I don't see any other 10 core 6950X CPUs in that list. I ran the benchmark a few more times. The lowest score I get is 24.48 seconds at 150 samples.