POV-Ray v3.5...great stress tester and HT tester...

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
This is a great rendering program I ran into and it can crash even some of the thought to be stable systems...running 2x instances of this on my system can generate the same high temps as prime95...for ultimate stability testing have prime95 running in the background in a 1 instance testing or superpi 32mb....


Download the program at www.povray.org in the download page....download the benchmark.ini file as well and after installing POV-Ray place the file in the program files/POV-Ray for Windows v3.5/scenes/advanced/ directory....

The launch the program....

Go into the options menu and uncheck "keep single instance"...This will allow you to open another POV-Ray program for HT testing and 100% stress testing....

Now go to Start - Run - type CMD in the command line..It will tae you to a DOS environment...

type cd...
type cd...

then type cd program files/POV-Ray for Windows v3.5/bin

then type pvengine -a

this will lauch a second app...


NOw go into the render menu....click Edit settings/render...under ini file hit browse and go into the program files/POV-Ray for Windows v3.5/scenes/advanced folder and click the benchmark ini file....

now in the command line type +SR0.0 +ER0.5.....(this is basically telling it to take the first half of the rendering of the proect....

dont hit render yet!!!!

Go into the second povray app...do same thing as above except in the command line hit +SR0.5 +ER1.0...this does the second half...A little inefficient as it will rerender line 192 twice but that likely makes less then 3-4 seconds in the overall time which is minute....


Now click render on the one and render on the other as close to together as possible....Now let run....


As a basis I get (2.4@3.5 292fsb, 3:2 (390ddr) cas 2,7,3,2 GAT enabled and CPC....Winxp no optimisation

Single instance = 26min 17sec
2x instances (1/2's) = 22min 45sec

overall improvement is 15.5%....


ONly funny thing is that when I ran 2 full instances it took 43min 19sec for an average of 21min 40sec each...Bu I guess the above format is better for actual use if someone wanted to apply it to a real rendering project other then the benchmark....The benchmark does not show the final pic or show it rendering...the pic is on the site it intent is to isolate the cpu and memory and not rely on a persons vid card rendering ability....


POst your time with cpu speed and OS used please...I
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
28,827
21,619
146
Thanks brudda, I'll give it a go for adding to my stability testing suite since I don't have HT.
 

jhu

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,918
9
81
here're my times with a celeron 800 and various compiles of povray:

povray.gcc.2.95
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 48.0 seconds (168 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 57 minutes 42.0 seconds (7062 seconds)
Total Time: 2 hours 0 minutes 36.0 seconds (7236 seconds)

povray.gcc3.387
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 37.0 seconds (157 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 53 minutes 36.0 seconds (6816 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 56 minutes 19.0 seconds (6979 seconds)

povray.gcc3.sse
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 7.0 seconds (7 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 39.0 seconds (159 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 55 minutes 42.0 seconds (6942 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 58 minutes 28.0 seconds (7108 seconds)

povray.gcc3.sse.387
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 40.0 seconds (160 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 58 minutes 40.0 seconds (7120 seconds)
Total Time: 2 hours 1 minutes 26.0 seconds (7286 seconds)

povray.icc
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 7.0 seconds (7 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 32.0 seconds (152 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 49 minutes 11.0 seconds (6551 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 51 minutes 50.0 seconds (6710 seconds)

povray.icc.ipo
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 29.0 seconds (149 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 47 minutes 41.0 seconds (6461 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 50 minutes 16.0 seconds (6616 seconds)
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: Mikewarrior2
Duvie,

Is that a new 2.4C M0 chip?


Mike



NO it is not!!! It is actually a D0 stepping chip and actually the packing date was like august or something.....I bought it from an ATer Shimishim....

NIce chip now I wish I had ram that coulod run closer to it....
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: jhu
here're my times with a celeron 800 and various compiles of povray:

povray.gcc.2.95
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 48.0 seconds (168 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 57 minutes 42.0 seconds (7062 seconds)
Total Time: 2 hours 0 minutes 36.0 seconds (7236 seconds)

povray.gcc3.387
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 37.0 seconds (157 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 53 minutes 36.0 seconds (6816 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 56 minutes 19.0 seconds (6979 seconds)

povray.gcc3.sse
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 7.0 seconds (7 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 39.0 seconds (159 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 55 minutes 42.0 seconds (6942 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 58 minutes 28.0 seconds (7108 seconds)

povray.gcc3.sse.387
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 40.0 seconds (160 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 58 minutes 40.0 seconds (7120 seconds)
Total Time: 2 hours 1 minutes 26.0 seconds (7286 seconds)

povray.icc
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 7.0 seconds (7 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 32.0 seconds (152 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 49 minutes 11.0 seconds (6551 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 51 minutes 50.0 seconds (6710 seconds)

povray.icc.ipo
Time For Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 6.0 seconds (6 seconds)
Time For Photon: 0 hours 2 minutes 29.0 seconds (149 seconds)
Time For Trace: 1 hours 47 minutes 41.0 seconds (6461 seconds)
Total Time: 1 hours 50 minutes 16.0 seconds (6616 seconds)


Is that last one optimised for Intels??? apears to be about a 8% difference from top to bottom with the different compilers....I could handle an 8% increase...How do I get the other versions or run a compiler on the existing app???
 

jhu

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,918
9
81
those are compiles on linux. the last two use intel's icc compiler. under windows, if you don't have microsoft visual c++, you might be able to run icc with cygwin installed (although i could be wrong).
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Testing my buddies barton I am building for him....

2500@3200+ (400fsb)(2.2ghz) w/ cas 2.5,3,3,7 pc3200 (not fully tweaked yet here)....

31min 43sec....3.5 is 20.6% faster w/ 39.9% slower versus 3.5 w/ HT
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Yep it is very nice....It helps he has the 200 more mhz though I wonder if he ran at that at a higher speed when he was talking to me....A 3200+ at the site only scored a 22min40sec so I have wondered a bit why the score is so much better....

Obviously athlons are strong here though the barton was not that impressive....Also the above 64 3200+ score mentioned above was in linux which also baffles me cause the linux score should be better head to head versus the winxp.....So I dont understand why he is 10% better then the linux score with his unless he ran it higher then his current 2.2ghz...Maybe memory timigs are also sweeter...


I would like to run mine with a 5:4 ratio as well instead of the 3:2 to see if memory speed and bandwidth can help me here.....


 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
28,827
21,619
146
Just ran a Barton@2.43ghz- 422DDR dual channel synch mode 3-3-3-8 timings- XP pro- 24m 57s 99.4 average PPS, 6m 46s off the Barton@+3200 speed
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |